Abnormal combustion detection method for internal-combustion engines from combustion indicator distribution modelling

• US 8,499,623 B2
• Filed: 11/02/2010
• Issued: 08/06/2013
• Est. Priority Date: 11/13/2009
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: IFP Energies Nouvelles
• Original Assignee: IFP Energies Nouvelles
• Inventors: Duval, Laurent, Pagot, Alexandre, Thirouard, Benoist, Zaccardi, Jean-Marc
• Primary Examiner(s): MCCALL, ERIC SCOTT
• Application Number:
  US12/917,633
• Publication Number:
  US 20110118953A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,008 Days
• Field of Search: 73/350.1, 73/350.3, 73/350.6, 731/140.2, 731/140.3, 731/140.7
• US Class Current: 73/114.02
• CPC Class Codes: F02D 19/12 peculiar to engines working with non-fuel substances or with anti-knock agents, e.g. with anti-knock fuel
• CPC Class Codes: F02D 35/023 by determining the cylinder pressure
• CPC Class Codes: F02D 35/027 using knock sensors
• CPC Class Codes: F02D 35/028 by determining the combustion timing or phasing
• CPC Class Codes: F02D 41/0002 Controlling intake air
• CPC Class Codes: F02D 41/0025 Controlling engines characterised by use of non-liquid fuels, pluralities of fuels, or non-fuel substances added to the combustible mixtures
• CPC Class Codes: F02D 41/402 Multiple injections
• CPC Class Codes: G01M 15/08 by monitoring pressure in cylinders

Abstract

An abnormal combustion detection method for spark-ignition internal-combustion engines, from combustion indicator distribution modelling is disclosed. At least one combustion indicator such as CA10 is determined. The distribution of N values of this indicator, acquired over N cycles preceding the cycle in progress, is modelled by determining coefficients of a theoretical distribution law. Modelling is repeated by removing extreme values from among the N values or for various working points of the engine, to obtain an evolution of the coefficients. At least one parameter characterizing evolution of at least one of these coefficients is determined. The start of an abnormal combustion is detected by comparing the parameter with a predetermined threshold, and the course of the abnormal combustion detected in the combustion chamber is controlled.

Claims

1. A method for controlling combustion of a spark-ignition internal-combustion engine, wherein at least one signal representative of a state of the combustion is recorded by at least one detector in the engine, and at least one indicator of the combustion at each engine cycle is determined from the signal for each engine cycle comprising:

modelling a distribution of N combustion indicator values acquired over N cycles preceding a cycle in progress, by determining coefficients of a theoretical distribution law;

repeating the modeling by removing values from among the N combustion indicator values or repeating the modeling for working points of the engine, to obtain an evolution of coefficients;

determining at least one parameter representing an evolution of at least one of the coefficients;

determining a frequency of abnormal combustions occurring during the N cycles preceding the cycle in progress by comparing the at least one parameter with a threshold; and

controlling a course of the abnormal combustion detected in the combustion chamber.

2. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein, prior to modeling a distribution, the at least one indicator is converted to at least one new indicator, for which a distribution of N values acquired over N cycles preceding the cycle in progress exhibits, for normal combustions, a lower dispersion than the non-converted indicators.

3. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the indicator is the crank angle where 10% of the energy which is introduced has been released.

4. A method as claimed in claim 3, wherein, prior to modeling a distribution, the at least one indicator is converted to at least one new indicator, for which a distribution of N values acquired over N cycles preceding the cycle in progress exhibits, for normal combustions, a lower dispersion than the non-converted indicators.

5. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the at least one signal is a continuous pressure measurement within the cylinder.

6. A method as claimed in claim 5, wherein, prior to modeling a distribution, the at least one indicator is converted to at least one new indicator, for which a distribution of N values acquired over N cycles preceding the cycle in progress exhibits, for normal combustions, a lower dispersion than the non-converted indicators.

7. A method as claimed in claim 5, wherein the indicator is the crank angle where 10% of the energy which is introduced has been released.

8. A method as claimed in claim 7, wherein, prior to modeling a distribution, the at least one indicator is converted to at least one new indicator, for which a distribution of N values acquired over N cycles preceding the cycle in progress exhibits, for normal combustions, a lower dispersion than the non-converted indicators.

9. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the threshold is directly defined from a tolerance on a gross value of coefficients.

10. A method as claimed in claim 9, wherein, prior to modeling a distribution, the at least one indicator is converted to at least one new indicator, for which a distribution of N values acquired over N cycles preceding the cycle in progress exhibits, for normal combustions, a lower dispersion than the non-converted indicators.

11. A method as claimed in claim 9, wherein the indicator is the crank angle where 10% of the energy which is introduced has been released.

12. A method as claimed in claim 11, wherein, prior to modeling a distribution, the at least one indicator is converted to at least one new indicator, for which a distribution of N values acquired over N cycles preceding the cycle in progress exhibits, for normal combustions, a lower dispersion than the non-converted indicators.

13. A method as claimed in claim 9, wherein the at least one signal is a continuous pressure measurement within the cylinder.

14. A method as claimed in claim 13, wherein, prior to modeling a distribution, the at least one indicator is converted to at least one new indicator, for which a distribution of N values acquired over N cycles preceding the cycle in progress exhibits, for normal combustions, a lower dispersion than the non-converted indicators.

15. A method as claimed in claim 13, wherein the indicator is the crank angle where 10% of the energy which is introduced has been released.

16. A method as claimed in claim 15, wherein, prior to modeling a distribution, the at least one indicator is converted to at least one new indicator, for which a distribution of N values acquired over N cycles preceding the cycle in progress exhibits, for normal combustions, a lower dispersion than the non-converted indicators.

17. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the threshold is defined by calculating first and second derivatives of each one of the coefficients, and maximum and relative variation bounds are fixed for the first and second derivatives.

18. A method as claimed in claim 17, wherein, prior to modeling a distribution, the at least one indicator is converted to at least one new indicator, for which a distribution of N values acquired over N cycles preceding the cycle in progress exhibits, for normal combustions, a lower dispersion than the non-converted indicators.

19. A method as claimed in claim 17, wherein the indicator is the crank angle where 10% of the energy which is introduced has been released.

20. A method as claimed in claim 19, wherein, prior to modeling a distribution, the at least one indicator is converted to at least one new indicator, for which a distribution of N values acquired over N cycles preceding the cycle in progress exhibits, for normal combustions, a lower dispersion than the non-converted indicators.

21. A method as claimed in claim 17, wherein the at least one signal is a continuous pressure measurement within the cylinder.

22. A method as claimed in claim 21, wherein, prior to modeling a distribution, the at least one indicator is converted to at least one new indicator, for which a distribution of N values acquired over N cycles preceding the cycle in progress exhibits, for normal combustions, a lower dispersion than the non-converted indicators.

23. A method as claimed in claim 21, wherein the indicator is the crank angle where 10% of the energy which is introduced has been released.

24. A method as claimed in claim 23, wherein, prior to modeling a distribution, the at least one indicator is converted to at least one new indicator, for which a distribution of N values acquired over N cycles preceding the cycle in progress exhibits, for normal combustions, a lower dispersion than the non-converted indicators.

25. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein an average frequency of pre-ignition appearance is determined by separately analyzing each of the coefficients and by separately calculating an average of a number of pre-ignitions by each of the coefficients.

26. A method as claimed in claim 25, wherein, prior to modeling a distribution, the at least one indicator is converted to at least one new indicator, for which a distribution of N values acquired over N cycles preceding the cycle in progress exhibits, for normal combustions, a lower dispersion than the non-converted indicators.

27. A method as claimed in claim 25, wherein the indicator is the crank angle where 10% of the energy which is introduced has been released.

28. A method as claimed in claim 27, wherein, prior to modeling a distribution, the at least one indicator is converted to at least one new indicator, for which a distribution of N values acquired over N cycles preceding the cycle in progress exhibits, for normal combustions, a lower dispersion than the non-converted indicators.

29. A method as claimed in claim 25, wherein the at least one signal is a continuous pressure measurement within the cylinder.

30. A method as claimed in claim 29, wherein, prior to modeling a distribution, the at least one indicator is converted to at least one new indicator, for which a distribution of N values acquired over N cycles preceding the cycle in progress exhibits, for normal combustions, a lower dispersion than the non-converted indicators.

31. A method as claimed in claim 29, wherein the indicator is the crank angle where 10% of the energy which is introduced has been released.

32. A method as claimed in claim 31, wherein, prior to modeling a distribution, the at least one indicator is converted to at least one new indicator, for which a distribution of N values acquired over N cycles preceding the cycle in progress exhibits, for normal combustions, a lower dispersion than the non-converted indicators.