Extracting training scenarios from test cases for user-interface component recognition

• US 8,504,998 B2
• Filed: 05/26/2010
• Issued: 08/06/2013
• Est. Priority Date: 05/26/2010
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Fujitsu Limited
• Original Assignee: Fujitsu Limited
• Inventors: Prasad, Mukul R.
• Primary Examiner(s): Nahar, Qamrun
• Assistant Examiner(s): KABIR, MOHAMMAD H
• Application Number:
  US12/787,979
• Publication Number:
  US 20110296314A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,168 Days
• Field of Search: None
• US Class Current: 717/131
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 8/10 Requirements analysis; Specification techniques
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 8/38 for implementing user interfaces

Abstract

In one embodiment, a method includes accessing a set of use cases of a software application and selecting, from the set of use cases, a subset of use cases that has a goodness-to-cost ratio that satisfies a predetermined requirement. Computing the goodness-to-cost ratio for the subset of use cases includes: for each use case from the subset of use cases, computing a second cost as a sum of the first costs associated with the user actions of the use case; computing a third cost as a sum of the second costs; for each user-interface component that is acted upon by at least one of the user actions of at least one of the use cases from the subset of use cases, computing a first goodness measure that indicates a level of user-action coverage that the subset of use cases provides on the user-interface component; computing a second goodness measure as a sum of the first goodness measures; and computing the goodness-to-cost ratio as a ratio between the second goodness measure and the third cost.

Claims

1. A method comprising, by one or more computing devices:

accessing a set of use cases of a software application, wherein;

the software application comprises one or more user-interface components that enable a user of the software application to interact with the software application;

each use case from the set of use cases comprises one or more user actions that act upon specific ones of the user-interface components; and

each one of the user actions is associated with a first cost for performing the user action; and

selecting, from the set of use cases, a subset of use cases that has a goodness-to-cost ratio that satisfies a predetermined requirement, wherein computing the goodness-to-cost ratio for the subset of use cases comprises;

for each use case from the subset of use cases, computing a second cost as a sum of the first costs associated with the user actions of the use case;

computing a third cost as a sum of the second costs;

for each user-interface component that is acted upon by at least one of the user actions of at least one of the use cases from the subset of use cases, computing a first goodness measure that indicates a level of user-action coverage that the subset of use cases provides on the user-interface component;

computing a second goodness measure as a sum of the first goodness measures; and

computing the goodness-to-cost ratio as a ratio between the second goodness measure and the third cost.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the subset of use cases has the highest goodness-to-cost ratio among all possible subsets of use cases selected from the set of use case.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein for each user-interface component that is acted upon by at least one of the user actions of at least one of the use cases from the subset of use cases, computing the first goodness measure comprises:

for each unique pair of use cases from the subset of use cases, computing a first distance between the pair of use cases with respect to the user-interface component, wherein the first distance indicates a difference between the user actions of the pair of use cases up to the user actions that act upon the user-interface component;

computing a second distance as a sum of the first distances; and

computing the first goodness measure based on the second distance.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein selecting, from the set of use cases, the subset of use cases comprises:

selecting, from the set of use cases, all use cases that are the only use cases among the set of use cases to comprise user actions that uniquely act upon at least one of the user-interface components or to comprise at least one unique combination of user action and user-interface component;

including the selected use cases in the subset of use cases;

computing the goodness-to-cost ratio of the subset of use cases based on the use cases currently included in the subset of use cases;

iteratively selecting, from one or more remaining use cases from the set of use cases, a use case that maximally increases the goodness-to-cost ratio of the subset of use cases and including the selected use case in the subset of use cases, until including additional use cases in the subset of use cases no longer increases the goodness-to-cost ratio of the subset of use cases.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein selecting, from the set of use cases, the subset of use cases comprises iterating among all possible subsets of the set of use cases using a branch-and-bound algorithm to locate the one subset of use cases that has the highest goodness-to-cost ratio.

6. The method of claim 1, further comprising training a user-interface-component-mapping tool using the subset of use cases, wherein the user-interface-component-mapping tool automatically maps a second user-interface component of a second user-interactive software application to a portion of source code of the second software application.

7. The method of claim 1, further comprising extracting the set of use cases from a set of test cases of the software application.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the level of user-action coverage is based on whether the user-interface component is exercised by the subset of use-cases.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein selecting the subset of use cases comprises selecting a plurality of use cases that maximizes a number of user-interface components exercised by at least one action when the subset of uses cases is performed.

10. A system comprising:

a memory comprising instructions executable by one or more processors; and

one or more processors coupled to the memory and operable to execute the instructions, the one or more processors being operable when executing the instructions to;

access a set of use cases of a software application, wherein;

the software application comprises one or more user-interface components that enable a user of the software application to interact with the software application;

each use case from the set of use cases comprises one or more user actions that act upon specific ones of the user-interface components; and

each one of the user actions is associated with a first cost for performing the user action; and

select, from the set of use cases, a subset of use cases that has a goodness-to-cost ratio that satisfies a predetermined requirement, wherein computing the goodness-to-cost ratio for the subset of use cases comprises;

for each use case from the subset of use cases, compute a second cost as a sum of the first costs associated with the user actions of the use case;

compute a third cost as a sum of the second costs;

for each user-interface component that is acted upon by at least one of the user actions of at least one of the use cases from the subset of use cases, compute a first goodness measure that indicates a level of user-action coverage that the subset of use cases provides on the user-interface component;

compute a second goodness measure as a sum of the first goodness measures; and

compute the goodness-to-cost ratio as a ratio between the second goodness measure and the third cost.

11. The system of claim 10, wherein the subset of use cases has the highest goodness-to-cost ratio among all possible subsets of use cases selected from the set of use case.

12. The system of claim 10, wherein for each user-interface component that is acted upon by at least one of the user actions of at least one of the use cases from the subset of use cases, compute the first goodness measure comprises:

for each unique pair of use cases from the subset of use cases, compute a first distance between the pair of use cases with respect to the user-interface component, wherein the first distance indicates a difference between the user actions of the pair of use cases up to the user actions that act upon the user-interface component;

compute a second distance as a sum of the first distances; and

compute the first goodness measure based on the second distance.

13. The system of claim 10, wherein select, from the set of use cases, the subset of use cases comprises:

select, from the set of use cases, all use cases that are the only use cases among the set of use cases to comprise user actions that uniquely act upon at least one of the user-interface components or to comprise at least one unique combination of user action and user-interface component;

include the selected use cases in the subset of use cases;

compute the goodness-to-cost ratio of the subset of use cases based on the use cases currently included in the subset of use cases;

iteratively select, from one or more remaining use cases from the set of use cases, a use case that maximally increases the goodness-to-cost ratio of the subset of use cases and include the selected use case in the subset of use cases, until including additional use cases in the subset of use cases no longer increases the goodness-to-cost ratio of the subset of use cases.

14. The system of claim 10, wherein select, from the set of use cases, the subset of use cases comprises iterate among all possible subsets of the set of use cases using a branch-and-bound algorithm to locate the one subset of use cases that has the highest goodness-to-cost ratio.

15. The system of claim 10, wherein the one or more processors are further operable when executing the instructions to train a user-interface-component-mapping tool using the subset of use cases, wherein the user-interface-component-mapping tool automatically maps a second user-interface component of a second user-interactive software application to a portion of source code of the second software application.

16. The system of claim 10, wherein the one or more processors are further operable when executing the instructions to extract the set of use cases from a set of test cases of the software application.

17. The system of claim 10, wherein the level of user-action coverage is based on whether the user-interface component is exercised by the subset of use-cases.

18. The system of claim 10, wherein the one or more processors is operable to select the subset of use cases by selecting a plurality of use cases that maximizes a number of user-interface components exercised by at least one action when the subset of uses cases is performed.

19. One or more computer-readable non-transitory storage media embodying software operable when executed by one or more computing devices to:

access a set of use cases of a software application, wherein;

the software application comprises one or more user-interface components that enable a user of the software application to interact with the software application;

each use case from the set of use cases comprises one or more user actions that act upon specific ones of the user-interface components; and

each one of the user actions is associated with a first cost for performing the user action; and

select, from the set of use cases, a subset of use cases that has a goodness-to-cost ratio that satisfies a predetermined requirement, wherein computing the goodness-to-cost ratio for the subset of use cases comprises;

for each use case from the subset of use cases, compute a second cost as a sum of the first costs associated with the user actions of the use case;

compute a third cost as a sum of the second costs;

for each user-interface component that is acted upon by at least one of the user actions of at least one of the use cases from the subset of use cases, compute a first goodness measure that indicates a level of user-action coverage that the subset of use cases provides on the user-interface component;

compute a second goodness measure as a sum of the first goodness measures; and

compute the goodness-to-cost ratio as a ratio between the second goodness measure and the third cost.

20. The media of claim 19, wherein the subset of use cases has the highest goodness-to-cost ratio among all possible subsets of use cases selected from the set of use case.

21. The media of claim 19, wherein for each user-interface component that is acted upon by at least one of the user actions of at least one of the use cases from the subset of use cases, compute the first goodness measure comprises:

for each unique pair of use cases from the subset of use cases, compute a first distance between the pair of use cases with respect to the user-interface component, wherein the first distance indicates a difference between the user actions of the pair of use cases up to the user actions that act upon the user-interface component;

compute a second distance as a sum of the first distances; and

compute the first goodness measure based on the second distance.

22. The media of claim 19, wherein select, from the set of use cases, the subset of use cases comprises:

select, from the set of use cases, all use cases that are the only use cases among the set of use cases to comprise user actions that uniquely act upon at least one of the user-interface components or to comprise at least one unique combination of user action and user-interface component;

include the selected use cases in the subset of use cases;

compute the goodness-to-cost ratio of the subset of use cases based on the use cases currently included in the subset of use cases;

iteratively select, from one or more remaining use cases from the set of use cases, a use case that maximally increases the goodness-to-cost ratio of the subset of use cases and include the selected use case in the subset of use cases, until including additional use cases in the subset of use cases no longer increases the goodness-to-cost ratio of the subset of use cases.

23. The media of claim 19, wherein select, from the set of use cases, the subset of use cases comprises iterate among all possible subsets of the set of use cases using a branch-and-bound algorithm to locate the one subset of use cases that has the highest goodness-to-cost ratio.

24. The media of claim 19, wherein the software is further operable when executed by the one or more computing devices to train a user-interface-component-mapping tool using the subset of use cases, wherein the user-interface-component-mapping tool automatically maps a second user-interface component of a second user-interactive software application to a portion of source code of the second software application.

25. The media of claim 19, wherein the software is further operable when executed by the one or more computing devices to extract the set of use cases from a set of test cases of the software application.

26. The media of claim 19, wherein the level of user-action coverage is based on whether the user-interface component is exercised by the subset of use-cases.

27. The media of claim 19, wherein selecting the subset of use cases comprises selecting a plurality of use cases that maximizes a number of user-interface components exercised by at least one action when the subset of uses cases is performed.

28. A system comprising:

means for accessing a set of use cases of a software application;

means for selecting, from the set of use cases, a subset of use cases that has a goodness-to-cost ratio that satisfies a predetermined requirement, wherein computing the goodness-to-cost ratio for the subset of use cases comprises;

for each use case from the subset of use cases, means for computing a second cost as a sum of the first costs associated with the user actions of the use case;

means for computing a third cost as a sum of the second costs;

for each user-interface component that is acted upon by at least one of the user actions of at least one of the use cases from the subset of use cases, means for computing a first goodness measure that indicates a level of user-action coverage that the subset of use cases provides on the user-interface component;

means for computing a second goodness measure as a sum of the first goodness measures; and

means for computing the goodness-to-cost ratio as a ratio between the second goodness measure and the third cost.

29. The system of claim 28, wherein the means for computing the first goodness measure comprises means for determining whether the user interface-component is exercised by the subset of use-cases.

30. The system of claim 28, wherein the means for selecting the subset of use cases comprises means for selecting a plurality of use cases that maximizes a number of user-interface components exercised by at least one action when the subset of uses cases is performed.