Method of compound document comparison

• US 8,527,864 B2
• Filed: 08/23/2010
• Issued: 09/03/2013
• Est. Priority Date: 01/29/2006
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Litera Technology LLC
• Original Assignee: Litera Technology LLC
• Inventors: Massand, Deepak
• Primary Examiner(s): Hutton, Jr., Doug
• Assistant Examiner(s): MCINTOSH, ANDREW T
• Application Number:
  US12/861,000
• Publication Number:
  US 20100318530A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,107 Days
• Field of Search: 715/209
• US Class Current: 715/209
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/258 Data format conversion from or to a database
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/33 Querying
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 40/194 Calculation of difference between files

Abstract

A method and system for comparing compound documents. An original compound document and a modified compound document are analyzed to determine and mark the location of embedded objects. A comparison is performed between an original primary document and the modified primary document, ignoring the embedded objects, the output of which is a comparison output document. The embedded objects are compared by copying the contents of the embedded objects to compatible documents, comparing the embedded object from the original compound document and the embedded object from the modified compound document, the output of which is inserted into the comparison output document using the location markers of the embedded objects.

Claims

1. A method of comparing documents, performed by a processor, comprising:

extracting a first OLE object from a first document comprising first data and the first OLE object;

extracting a second OLE object from a second document comprising second data and the second OLE object;

comparing the first data with the second data to generate a primary comparison output document and comparing the first extracted OLE object with the second extracted OLE object to generate an object comparison output document; and

generating a comparison output document by inserting the object comparison output document including a result of the comparing of the first extracted OLE object with the second extracted OLE object into the primary comparison output document including a result of the comparing of the first data with the second data.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

determining at least one of a first location of the first OLE object and a second location of the second OLE object;

inserting a result of the comparing of the first extracted OLE object and the second extracted OLE object into the comparison output document based on at least one of the first location and the second location.

3. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

providing information based on the comparison output document for displaying differences between at least one of the first extracted OLE object and the second extracted OLE object and between the first data and the second data.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein the comparison output document includes data used to display discrete differences between the first extracted OLE object and the second extracted OLE object in a color format, an underline format, a bold format, or an italics format.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the comparison output document includes data reflecting a difference between the first extracted OLE object and the second extracted OLE object.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the first extracted OLE object is of a type compatible with an application that created the first OLE object.

7. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing instructions that, when executed by a processor, perform a process for comparing documents, the process comprising:

extracting a first OLE object from a first document comprising first data and the first OLE object;

extracting a second OLE object from a second document comprising second data and the second OLE object;

comparing the first data with the second data to generate a primary comparison output document and the first extracted OLE object with the second extracted OLE object to generate an object comparison output document; and

generating a comparison output document by inserting the object comparison output document including a result of the comparing of the first extracted OLE object with the second extracted OLE object into the primary comparison output document including a result of the comparing of the first data with the second data.

8. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 7, further including instructions that, when executed by the processor, perform processes comprising:

determining at least one of a first location of the first OLE object and a second location of the second OLE object;

inserting a result of the comparing of the first extracted OLE object and the second extracted OLE object into the comparison output document based on at least one of the first location and the second location.

9. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 7, further including instructions that, when executed by the processor, perform processes comprising:

providing information based on the comparison output document for displaying differences between at least one of the first extracted OLE object and the second extracted OLE object and between the first data and the second data.

10. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 9, wherein the comparison output document includes data used to display discrete differences in a color format, an underline format, a bold format, or an italics format.

11. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 7, wherein the comparison output document includes data reflecting a difference between the first extracted OLE object and the second extracted OLE object.

12. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 7, wherein the first extracted OLE object is of a type compatible with an application that created the first OLE object.

13. A system for comparing documents comprising:

a processor; and

a memory including instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to perform the operations of;

extracting a first OLE object from a first document comprising first data and the first OLE object;

extracting a second OLE object from a second document comprising second data and the second OLE object;

comparing the first data with the second data and the first extracted OLE object with the second extracted OLE object, and

comparing the first data with the second data to generate a primary comparison output document and the first extracted OLE object with the second extracted OLE object to generate an object comparison output document; and

generating a comparison output document by inserting the object comparison output document including a result of the comparing of the first extracted OLE object with the second extracted OLE object into the primary comparison output document including a result of the comparing of the first data with the second data.

14. The system of claim 13, wherein the processor further performs the operations of:

determining at least one of a first location of the first OLE object and a second location of the second OLE object;

inserting a result of the comparing of the first extracted OLE object and the second extracted OLE object into the comparison output document based on at least one of the first location and the second location.

15. The system of claim 13, wherein the processor further performs the operation of:

providing information based on the comparison output document for displaying differences between at least one of the first extracted OLE object and the second extracted OLE object and between the first data and the second data.

16. The system of claim 15, wherein the comparison output document includes data used to display discrete differences in a color format, an underline format, a bold format, or an italics format.

17. The system of claim 13, wherein the comparison output document includes data reflecting a difference between the first extracted OLE object and the second extracted OLE object.

18. The system of claim 13, wherein the first extracted OLE object is of a type compatible with an application that created the first OLE object.

19. A system of comparing documents comprising:

a processor; and

a memory including instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to perform the operations of;

receiving information associated with a first document including first data, a first OLE object embedded in the first document, and a second OLE object embedded in the first document;

receiving information associated with a second document including second data, a third OLE object embedded in the second document, and a fourth OLE object embedded in the second document;

receiving a request to ignore the first OLE object,

comparing, based on the request, using intermediate files, the first data with the second data to generate a primary comparison output document and the second OLE object with the fourth OLE object to generate an object comparison output document, and

generating a comparison output document by inserting the object comparison output document including a result of the comparing of the second OLE object with the fourth OLE object into the primary comparison output document including a result of the comparing of the first data with the second data.

20. The system of claim 19, wherein the request includes a request from a user to exclude the first OLE object from comparison operations.

21. The system of claim 19, wherein the request includes an instruction to exclude from comparison operations OLE objects with a document type of the first OLE object.

22. A method of comparing documents, performed by a processor, comprising:

receiving information associated with a first document including first data and a first OLE object embedded in the first document;

receiving information associated with a second document including second data and a second OLE object embedded in the second document;

comparing the first data with the second data to detect any differences between the first data and the second data and generate a primary comparison output document;

comparing the first OLE object with the second OLE object to detect any differences between the first OLE object and the second OLE object and generate an object comparison output document; and

generating a comparison output document by inserting the object comparison document including a result of the comparing of the first OLE object with the second OLE object into the primary comparison output document including a result of the comparing of the first data with the second data, wherein the comparison output document reflects detected differences between the first data and the second data and the first OLE object and the second OLE object.

23. The method of claim 22, further comprising:

providing information based on the comparison output document for displaying differences between at least one of the first data and the second data and differences between the OLE object and the second OLE object.

24. A system for comparing compound documents, wherein a compound document comprises a primary document and an OLE object, the system comprising:

a processor; and

a memory including instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to perform the operations of;

extracting a first OLE object from a first compound document to a first object comparison file and a second OLE object from a second compound document to a second object comparison file,

comparing a first primary document of the first compound document and a second primary document of the second compound document to generate a primary comparison output document;

comparing the first object comparison file and the second object comparison file to generate an object comparison output document; and

generating a comparison output document by inserting the object comparison output document including a result of the comparison of the first object comparison file and the second object comparison file into the primary comparison output document including a result of the comparison of the first primary document and the second primary document.

25. The system of claim 24, wherein the operation of extracting further includes marking a location of the first OLE object in the first compound document.

26. The system of claim 25, wherein the location of the first OLE object is marked by storing the location in a database file.

27. The system of claim 24, wherein the first primary document is one of a word processing document, a spreadsheet document, a PDF document, a flowchart document, a computer aided design document, an image document, and a presentation document.

28. The system of claim 24, wherein the processor further performs the operations of:

determining an OLE object location from one of the first compound document or the second compound document; and

inserting the object comparison output into the primary comparison output document based on the OLE object location.

29. The system of claim 24, wherein the result of the object comparison includes data reflecting a difference between the first OLE object and the second OLE object.

30. The system of claim 24, wherein the first object comparison file is of a type compatible with an application that created the first OLE object.

31. The system of claim 24, wherein the operation of extracting further comprises the operation of converting the first OLE object to the first object comparison file, such that a file type of the first object comparison file is different from a file type of the first OLE object.