Method and apparatus for assessing battery state of health

• US 8,531,158 B2
• Filed: 11/01/2010
• Issued: 09/10/2013
• Est. Priority Date: 11/01/2010
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: GM Global Technology Operations LLC (General Motors Company)
• Original Assignee: GM Global Technology Operations LLC (General Motors Company)
• Inventors: Wang, John S., Liu, Ping, Wang, Shuoqin, Soukiazian, Souren, Verbrugge, Mark W.
• Primary Examiner(s): Dunn, Drew A
• Assistant Examiner(s): GRANT, ROBERT J
• Application Number:
  US12/916,735
• Publication Number:
  US 20120105068A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,044 Days
• Field of Search: 320/132, 324/432
• US Class Current: 320/132
• CPC Class Codes: H01M 10/0525 Rocking-chair batteries, i.e. batteries with lithium insertion or intercalation in both electrodes; Lithium-ion batteries
• CPC Class Codes: H01M 10/48 Accumulators combined with arrangements for measuring, testing or indicating the condition of cells, e.g. the level or density of the electrolyte constructional details of current conducting connections for detecting conditions inside cells or batteries, e.g. details of voltage sensing terminals, H01M50/569
• CPC Class Codes: Y02E 60/10 Energy storage using batteries

Abstract

A method for monitoring a lithium-ion battery cell includes monitoring a battery cell voltage and a corresponding state of charge of the battery cell during an electric power event which may include either an electric power charge event or an electric power discharge event. A measured potential-derivative is determined by differentiating the battery cell voltage in relation to the corresponding state of charge of the battery during the electric power event. The measured potential-derivative is compared with a preferred anode potential-derivative of an anode charge curve (for electric power discharge events) or an anode discharge curve (for electric power charge events), and with a preferred cathode potential-derivative of a cathode charge curve (for electric power charge events) or a cathode discharge charge curve (for electric power discharge events). A first state of health parameter of the battery cell corresponding to the comparison of the measured potential-derivative with the preferred anode potential-derivative of the anode curve is determined. And, a second state of health parameter of the battery cell corresponding to the comparison of the measured potential-derivative with the preferred cathode potential-derivative of the cathode curve is determined.

Claims

1. Method for monitoring a lithium-ion battery cell, comprising:

monitoring a battery cell voltage and a corresponding state of charge of the battery cell during an electric power event;

determining a measured potential-derivative by differentiating the battery cell voltage in relation to the corresponding state of charge of the battery during the electric power event;

comparing the measured potential-derivative with a preferred anode potential-derivative of an anode curve;

comparing the measured potential-derivative with a preferred cathode potential-derivative of a cathode curve;

determining a first state of health parameter of the battery cell corresponding to the comparison of the measured potential-derivative with the preferred anode potential-derivative of the anode curve; and

determining a second state of health parameter of the battery cell corresponding to the comparison of the measured potential-derivative with the preferred cathode potential-derivative of the cathode curve.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein:

said electric power event comprises an electric power discharge event;

said anode curve comprises an anode charge curve; and

said cathode curve comprises a cathode discharge curve.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein comparing the measured potential-derivative with the preferred anode potential-derivative of the anode charge curve comprises:

identifying measured signature peaks of the measured potential-derivative; and

determining a total measured anode capacity comprising a charge capacity difference between the measured signature peaks of the measured potential-derivative.

4. The method of claim 3, further comprising:

identifying preferred signature peaks of the preferred anode potential-derivative; and

determining a preferred total anode capacity comprising a charge capacity difference between the preferred signature peaks of the preferred anode potential-derivative;

wherein determining the first state of health parameter of the battery cell corresponding to the comparison of the measured potential-derivative with the preferred anode potential-derivative of the anode charge curve comprises determining a total graphite anode capacity by comparing the total measured anode capacity and the preferred total anode capacity.

5. The method of claim 2, wherein comparing the measured potential-derivative with the preferred anode potential-derivative of the anode charge curve comprises:

identifying preferred signature peaks of the preferred anode potential-derivative;

identifying measured signature peaks of the measured potential-derivative; and

determining a shift in the measured signature peaks relative to the preferred signature peaks.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein determining the first state of health parameter of the battery cell corresponding to the comparison of the measured potential-derivative with the preferred anode potential-derivative of the anode charge curve comprises determining a magnitude of lithium loss and total capacity loss of the battery cell corresponding to the shift in the measured signature peaks relative to the preferred signature peaks.

7. The method of claim 2, wherein comparing the measured potential-derivative with the preferred cathode potential-derivative of the cathode discharge curve comprises:

determining a potential-derivative for a cathode voltage response based upon the comparison of the measured potential-derivative with the preferred anode potential-derivative; and

comparing the potential-derivative for the cathode voltage response with the preferred cathode potential-derivative.

8. The method of claim 2, wherein the electric power discharge event comprises a discharge of the battery cell from a state of charge greater than 80% to a state of charge less than 20%.

9. The method of claim 2, wherein comparing the measured potential-derivative with the preferred anode potential-derivative of the anode charge curve comprises comparing the measured potential-derivative with an anode potential-derivative of an anode charge curve for a new battery cell, the anode potential-derivative of the anode charge curve for the new battery cell determined by measuring battery parameters correlated to the anode against a lithium electrode during a discharge event of the new battery cell.

10. The method of claim 2, wherein comparing the measured potential-derivative with the preferred cathode potential-derivative of the cathode discharge curve comprises comparing the measured potential-derivative with a cathode potential-derivative of a cathode discharge curve for a new battery cell, the cathode potential-derivative of the cathode discharge curve for the new battery cell determined by measuring battery parameters correlated to the cathode against a lithium electrode during a discharge event of the new battery cell.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein:

said electric power event comprises an electric power charge event;

said anode curve comprises an anode discharge curve; and

said cathode curve comprises a cathode charge curve.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein comparing the measured potential-derivative with the preferred anode potential-derivative of the anode discharge curve comprises:

identifying measured signature peaks of the measured potential-derivative; and

determining a total measured anode capacity comprising a charge capacity difference between the measured signature peaks of the measured potential-derivative.

13. The method of claim 12, further comprising

identifying preferred signature peaks of the preferred anode potential-derivative;

and

determining a preferred total anode capacity comprising a charge capacity difference between the preferred signature peaks of the preferred anode potential-derivative;

wherein determining the first state of health parameter of the battery cell corresponding to the comparison of the measured potential-derivative with the preferred anode potential-derivative of the anode discharge curve comprises determining a total graphite anode capacity by comparing the total measured anode capacity and the preferred total anode capacity.

14. The method of claim 11, wherein comparing the measured potential-derivative with the preferred anode potential-derivative of the anode discharge curve comprises:

identifying preferred signature peaks of the preferred anode potential-derivative;

identifying measured signature peaks of the measured potential-derivative; and

determining a shift in the measured signature peaks relative to the preferred signature peaks.

15. The method of claim 14, wherein determining the first state of health parameter of the battery cell corresponding to the comparison of the measured potential-derivative with the preferred anode potential-derivative of the anode discharge curve comprises determining a magnitude of lithium loss and total capacity loss of the battery cell corresponding to the shift in the measured signature peaks relative to the preferred signature peaks.

16. The method of claim 11, wherein comparing the measured potential-derivative with the preferred cathode potential-derivative of the cathode charge curve comprises:

determining a potential-derivative for a cathode voltage response based upon the comparison of the measured potential-derivative with the preferred anode potential-derivative; and

comparing the potential-derivative for the cathode voltage response with the preferred cathode potential-derivative.

17. The method of claim 11, wherein the electric power charge event comprises a charge of the battery cell from a state of charge less than 20% to a state of charge greater than 80%.

18. The method of claim 11, wherein comparing the measured potential-derivative with the preferred anode potential-derivative of the anode discharge curve comprises comparing the measured potential-derivative with an anode potential-derivative of an anode discharge curve for a new battery cell, the anode potential-derivative of the anode discharge curve for the new battery cell determined by measuring battery parameters correlated to the anode against a lithium electrode during a charge event of the new battery cell.

19. The method of claim 11, wherein comparing the measured potential-derivative with the preferred cathode potential-derivative of the cathode charge curve comprises comparing the measured potential-derivative with a cathode potential-derivative of a cathode charge curve for a new battery cell, the cathode potential-derivative of the cathode charge curve for the new battery cell determined by measuring battery parameters correlated to the cathode against a lithium electrode during a charge event of the new battery cell.