Interface authorization scheme

• US 8,532,694 B2
• Filed: 12/21/2009
• Issued: 09/10/2013
• Est. Priority Date: 12/30/2008
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Qualcomm, Inc.
• Original Assignee: Qualcomm, Inc.
• Inventors: Gupta, Rajarshi
• Primary Examiner(s): Alam, Fayyaz
• Application Number:
  US12/643,681
• Publication Number:
  US 20100169412A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,359 Days
• Field of Search: 455443-446, 455/449, 455/26.1, 709227-229, 726 2- 6, 726 26- 30
• US Class Current: 455/525
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/102 Entity profiles
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 92/20 between access points

Abstract

An authorization scheme controls whether an interface is established between communication nodes. Such a scheme may be used, for example, to determine whether to establish a direct interface (e.g., an X2 interface) between a pair of access points. A decision to establish a direct interface between nodes may be based on a node type of one or both of the nodes. A decision to establish a direct interface between nodes may be based on whether the nodes belong to the same group.

Claims

1. A method of communication, comprising:

receiving, at a first base station, a request to establish an interface from a second base station;

determining a power class of the second base station; and

determining whether to allow the interface to be established based at least on the determined power class of the second base station and a power class of the first base station.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the determination of whether to allow the interface to be established is further based on whether the second base station is a macro access point or a femto access point.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the determination of whether to allow the interface to be established comprises allowing the interface to be established if the second base station is a macro access point and the first base station is a macro access point.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the determination of whether to allow the interface to be established comprises allowing the interface to be established if the second base station is a macro access point and the first base station is a femto access point.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the determination of whether to allow the interface to be established comprises not allowing the interface to be established if the second base station is a femto access point and the first base station is a macro access point.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the determination of whether to allow the interface to be established comprises allowing the interface to be established if the second base station is a femto access point and the first base station is a femto access point.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the determination of whether to allow the interface to be established comprises determining whether the first base station and the second base station belong to a common group.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein the determination of whether the first base station and the second base station belong to the common group comprises determining whether the first base station and the second base station belong to a common closed subscriber group.

9. The method of claim 7, wherein the determination of whether the first base station and the second base station belong to the common group comprises determining whether the first base station and the second base station belong to a common enterprise.

10. The method of claim 7, wherein the determination of whether the first base station and the second base station belong to the common group comprises determining whether the first base station and the second base station are under a common gateway.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein the determination of the power class is based on an identifier of the first base station, information obtained about the first base station before receiving the request, and/or an indication of the power class included in the request.

12. The method of claim 1, wherein the interface comprises a direct access point to access point interface.

13. The method of claim 1, wherein the interface comprises an X2 interface.

26. The method of claim 1, wherein the request from the second base station comprises a close subscriber group (CSG) indicator associated with at least the first base station or second base station.

27. The method of claim 26, wherein determining whether to allow the interface to be established is further based, in part, on the CSG indicator.

28. The method of claim 26, further comprising receiving a handover request from the second base station, the handover corresponding to a UE that is associated with the CSG indicator and served by the second base station.

35. The method of claim 1, in which the determining whether to allow comprises:

allowing, at the first base station, the interface to be established when the first base station is a first power class of base station and the second base station is a second power class of base station; and

denying, at the first base station, the interface to be established when the first base station is the second power class of base station and the second base station is the first power class of base station, the first power class being different from the second power class.

36. The method of claim 35, in which the first power class is a femto access point and the second power class is a macro access point.

37. The method of claim 1, in which the first base station is identified by the second base station as a candidate for establishing the interface.

14. An apparatus for communication, comprising:

a communication controller configured to receive, at a first base station, a request to establish an interface from a second base station; and

an interface authorization controller configured;

to determine a power class of the second base station, and

to determine whether to allow the interface to be established based at least on the determined power class of the second base station and a power class of the first base station.

15. The apparatus of claim 14, wherein the determination of whether to allow the interface to be established is further based on whether the second base station is a macro access point or a femto access point.

16. The apparatus of claim 14, wherein the determination of whether to allow the interface to be established comprises determining whether the first base station and the second base station belong to a common group.

17. The apparatus of claim 14, wherein the interface comprises an X2 interface.

29. The apparatus of claim 14, wherein the request from the second base station comprises a close subscriber group (CSG) indicator associated with at least the first base station or second base station.

30. The apparatus of claim 29, wherein the interface authorization controller determines whether to allow the interface to be established further based, in part, on the CSG indicator.

18. An apparatus for communication, comprising:

means for receiving, at a first base station, a request to establish an interface from a second base station;

means for determining a power class of the second base station; and

means for determining whether to allow the interface to be established based at least on the determined power class of the second base station and a power class of the first base station.

19. The apparatus of claim 18, wherein the determination of whether to allow the interface to be established is further based on whether the second base station is a macro access point or a femto access point.

20. The apparatus of claim 18, wherein the determination of whether to allow the interface to be established comprises determining whether the first base station and the second base station belong to a common group.

21. The apparatus of claim 18, wherein the interface comprises an X2 interface.

31. The apparatus of claim 18, wherein the request from the second base station comprises a close subscriber group (CSG) indicator associated with at least the first base station or second base station.

32. The apparatus of claim 31, wherein the means for determining whether to allow the interface to be established determines whether to allow the interface to be established further based, in part, on the CSG indicator.

22. A computer-program product, comprising:

a non-transitory computer-readable medium having non-transitory program code recorded thereon, the program code comprising;

program code to receive, at a first base station, a request to establish an interface from a second base station;

program code to determine a power class of the second base station; and

program code to determine whether to allow the interface to be established based at least on the determined power class of the second base station and a power class of the first base station.

23. The computer-program product of claim 22, wherein the determination of whether to allow the interface to be established is further based on whether the second base station is a macro access point or a femto access point.

24. The computer-program product of claim 22, wherein the determination of whether to allow the interface to be established comprises determining whether the first base station and the second base station belong to a common group.

25. The computer-program product of claim 22, wherein the interface comprises an X2 interface.

33. The computer-program product of claim 22, wherein the request from the second base station comprises a close subscriber group (CSG) indicator associated with at least the first base station or second base station.

34. The computer-program product of claim 33, wherein the program code to determine whether to allow the interface determines whether to allow the interface to be established further based, in part, on the CSG indicator.