Method of preventing collisions by reacting to control system failures

• US 8,554,397 B1
• Filed: 08/25/2011
• Issued: 10/08/2013
• Est. Priority Date: 12/10/2010
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Cybertron International Incorporated
• Original Assignee: Cybertron International Incorporated
• Inventors: Nishinaga, Eugene Iwao, Nishinaga, Kevin Kohei
• Primary Examiner(s): Black, Thomas
• Assistant Examiner(s): PAYNE, ROBERT T
• Application Number:
  US13/218,434
• Time in Patent Office: 775 Days
• Field of Search: 701/19, 701/23, 701/1, 701/24, 701/301, 701/20, 104/96
• US Class Current: 701/19
• CPC Class Codes: B61B 1/02 General arrangement of stations and platforms including protection devices for the passengers B61B1/005 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: B61B 3/02 with self-propelled vehicles
• CPC Class Codes: B61L 15/0062 On-board target speed calculation or supervision
• CPC Class Codes: B61L 27/04 Automatic systems, e.g. controlled by train; Change-over to manual control
• CPC Class Codes: B61L 3/00 Devices along the route for controlling devices on the vehicle or train, e.g. to release brake or to operate a warning signal
• CPC Class Codes: G08G 1/20 Monitoring the location of vehicles belonging to a group, e.g. fleet of vehicles, countable or determined number of vehicles

Abstract

The present invention relates generally to ground transportation systems, and more particularly to a fixed guideway transportation system that achieves a superior ratio of benefits per cost, is lower in net present cost and thus more easily justified for lower density corridors, and can provide passenger carrying capacities appropriate for higher density corridors serviced by mass rapid transit systems today. According to certain aspects, the present invention provides a methodology for limiting the rise in headway as the vehicle speed increases. This innovation further allows systems to achieve shorter time separations between vehicles traveling at high speeds, thus significantly improving the utility of fixed guideway infrastructure.

Claims

1. A method of controlling a plurality of driverless vehicles in a fixed guideway system, comprising:

identifying a controlled braking rate for each of the plurality of vehicles, the controlled braking rate including best and worst case jerk and acceleration rates for emergency braking;

periodically determining whether there are any safety violations in the system, the determination taking into account the controlled braking rates of the vehicles; and

withholding transmission of a safety signal to certain of the vehicles if there is a violation.

2. A method according to claim 1, further comprising:

maintaining separation between certain of the vehicles by calculating a stopping distance delta between a leading vehicle and a trailing vehicle.

3. A method according to claim 2, wherein the stopping distance delta includes a worst case stopping distance of the trailing vehicle and a best case stopping distance of the leading vehicle.

4. A method according to claim 3, further comprising calculating the worst case stopping distance and the best case stopping distance using the controlled braking rate.

5. A method according to claim 2, wherein periodically determining whether there are any safety violations includes continually monitoring the stopping distance delta.

6. A method according to claim 5, wherein continually monitoring the stopping distance delta includes periodically receiving location information from the plurality of vehicles.

7. A method according to claim 6, wherein communication based train control is used to periodically receive the location information from the plurality of vehicles.

8. A method according to claim 1, wherein periodically determining whether there are any safety violations includes maintaining a minimum headway between all vehicles in the system.

9. A method according to claim 1, wherein periodically determining whether there are any safety violations includes determining whether there are one or more of a civil speed limit violation, a safe separation violation between two vehicles traveling in the same direction on the same track, a merge point violation, a diverge point violation, and a safe separation violation between two vehicles traveling in opposite directions on the same track.

10. A system for controlling a plurality of driverless vehicles in a fixed guideway system, comprising:

an interface in each of the vehicles; and

a station controller that communicates with the interface in each of the vehicles to control the application of emergency braking in each of the vehicles, the station controller controlling the application of emergency braking in each of the vehicles by;

identifying a controlled braking rate for each of the plurality of vehicles, the controlled braking rate including best and worst case jerk and acceleration rates for emergency braking;

periodically determining whether there are any safety violations in the system, the determination taking into account the controlled braking rates of the vehicles, and

withholding transmission of a safety signal to certain of the vehicles if there is a violation.

11. A system according to claim 10, wherein the station controller further maintains separation between certain of the vehicles by calculating a stopping distance delta between a leading vehicle and a trailing vehicle.

12. A system according to claim 11, wherein the stopping distance delta includes a worst case stopping distance of the trailing vehicle and a best case stopping distance of the leading vehicle.

13. A system according to claim 12, wherein the station controller further calculates the worst case stopping distance and the best case stopping distance using the controlled braking rate.

14. A system according to claim 11, wherein the station controller periodically determines any safety violations by continually monitoring the stopping distance delta.

15. A system according to claim 14, wherein continually monitoring the stopping distance delta includes periodically receiving location information from the plurality of vehicles.

16. A system according to claim 15, wherein communication based train control is used to periodically receive the location information from the plurality of vehicles.

17. A system according to claim 10, wherein the station controller periodically determines safety violations by maintaining a minimum headway between all vehicles in the system.

18. A system according to claim 10, wherein safety violations include one or more of a civil speed limit violation, a safe separation violation between two vehicles traveling in the same direction on the same track, a merge point violation, a diverge point violation, and a safe separation violation between two vehicles traveling in opposite directions on the same track.

19. A system according to claim 10, further comprising:

a transmitter in the station controller that transmits a safety enable signal to the vehicles if the station controller does not detect any safety violations, wherein the station controller withholds transmission of the safety enable signal to the certain vehicles.

20. A system according to claim 13, further comprising:

a receiver in the station controller that periodically receives location information from the plurality of vehicles.

21. A system according to claim 20, wherein communication based train control is used to periodically receive the location information from the plurality of vehicles.