Interactive personal surveillance and security (IPSS) system

• US 8,559,914 B2
• Filed: 01/16/2009
• Issued: 10/15/2013
• Est. Priority Date: 01/16/2008
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Big Will Enterprises Inc.
• Original Assignee: Martin Kelly Jones
• Inventors: Jones, M. Kelly
• Primary Examiner(s): Gonzalez, Amancio
• Application Number:
  US12/354,927
• Publication Number:
  US 20090181640A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,733 Days
• Field of Search: 455/404.1, 455/404.2, 455/456.3, 340/540, 340/573.1, 340/539.11, 340/988
• US Class Current: 455/404.2
• CPC Class Codes: G08B 13/196 using television cameras
• CPC Class Codes: G08B 25/008 Alarm setting and unsetting, i.e. arming or disarming of the security system
• CPC Class Codes: G08B 25/08 using communication transmission lines G08B13/19658, G08B21/0286, G08B25/016 take precedence
• CPC Class Codes: H04M 1/72418 for supporting emergency services
• CPC Class Codes: H04M 11/04 with alarm systems, e.g. fire, police or burglar alarm systems
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 4/025 using location based information parameters
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 4/90 Services for handling of emergency or hazardous situations, e.g. earthquake and tsunami warning systems [ETWS]

Abstract

An interactive personal surveillance and security (IPSS) system for users carrying wireless communication devices. The system utilizes portable communication devices that are also capable of capturing and/or sending surveillance information. The system allows users carrying these devices to automatically capture surveillance information, have the information sent to one or more automated and remotely located surveillance (RLS) systems, and establish interactivity for the verification of determining secure or dangerous environments, encounters, logging events, or other encounters or observations. The RLS systems receive information from user communication devices and can follow user-definable parameters that establish the level or type of interactivity and determining when alarms or messages to third parties are needed. An IPSS system is user-definable and may become tailored and may respond to one or more users differently, based on each user'"'"'s set-up and changes to the system. The interactive personal surveillance system may also react differently based on users'"'"' location, the users'"'"' potential safety or risk, when the users react differently to an event, others around them, etc.

Claims

1. An interactive personal security and surveillance system comprising:

at least one computing device; and

at least one application executable in the at least one computing device, the application comprising;

logic that determines a user activity and/or user surroundings by matching sensor data to at least one algorithm with at least one user-defined parameter;

logic that determines a surveillance mode that corresponds to the user activity and/or the user surroundings;

logic that facilitates a user-defined response to the user activity and/or the user surroundings;

logic that assigns a risk level associated with the user activity and/or the user surroundings;

logic that accesses a remote security database to determine the user surroundings;

logic that composes a dynamic contact list based on the user activity and/or the user surroundings;

logic that transmits surveillance information to a publicly searchable database;

logic that communicates the surveillance information to at least one remotely located computer device; and

logic that remotely stores the surveillance information.

2. The system of claim 1, wherein the logic that facilitates the user-defined response further comprises logic that automatically activates the user-defined response to the user activity and/or the user surroundings.

3. The system of claim 1, further comprising logic that allows another authorized remote user to monitor the user activity and/or the user surroundings.

4. The system of claim 1, further comprising logic that provides the user an instruction according to the surveillance mode.

5. A system comprising:

at least one computing device; and

at least one application executable in the at least one computing device, the application comprising;

logic that determines a user activity and/or user surroundings;

logic that determines a surveillance mode that corresponds to the user activity and/or the user surroundings;

logic that facilitates a user-defined response to the user activity and/or the user surroundings; and

logic that communicates surveillance information to at least one remotely located computer device.

6. The system of claim 5, wherein the logic that facilitates the user-defined response further comprises logic that automatically activates the user-defined response to the user activity and/or the user surroundings.

7. The system of claim 5, wherein the logic that facilitates the user-defined response further comprises logic that assigns a risk level associated with the user activity and/or the user surroundings.

8. The system of claim 5, wherein the logic that communicates the surveillance information further comprises logic that transmits the surveillance information to a publicly searchable database.

9. The system of claim 5, wherein the logic that communicates the surveillance information further comprises:

logic that composes a dynamic contact list based on the user activity and/or the user surroundings; and

logic that notifies at least one contact from the dynamic contact list.

10. The system of claim 5, wherein the logic that determines the user activity and/or the user surroundings further comprises logic that matches sensor data to at least one algorithm with at least one user-defined parameter.

11. The system of claim 5, wherein the logic that determines the user activity and/or the user surroundings further comprises logic that accesses a remote security database.

12. The system of claim 5, further comprising logic that allows another authorized remote user to monitor the user activity and/or the user surroundings.

13. The system of claim 5, further comprising logic that provides the user an instruction according to the surveillance mode.

14. The system of claim 5, further comprising logic that encodes for display a false functioning screen according to the surveillance mode.

15. A method comprising the steps of:

determining, by a computing device, a user activity and/or user surroundings;

determining, by the computing device, a surveillance mode that corresponds to the user activity and/or the user surroundings;

facilitating, by the computing device, a user-defined response to the user activity and/or the user surroundings; and

communicating, by the computing device, surveillance information to at least one remotely located computer device.

16. The method of claim 15, wherein the step of facilitating the user-defined response further comprises the step of automatically activating, by the computing device, the user-defined response to the user activity and/or the user surroundings.

17. The method of claim 15, wherein the step of facilitating the user-defined response further comprises the step of assigning, by the computing device, a risk level associated with the user activity and/or the user surroundings.

18. The method of claim 15, wherein the step of communicating the surveillance information further comprises the step of transmitting, by the computing device, the surveillance information to a publicly searchable database.

19. The method of claim 15, wherein the step of communicating the surveillance information further comprises the steps of:

composing, by the computing device, a dynamic contact list based on the user activity and/or the user surroundings; and

notifying, by the computing device, at least one contact from the dynamic contact list.

20. The method of claim 15, wherein the step of determining the user activity and/or the user surroundings further comprises the step of matching, by the computing device, sensor data to at least one algorithm with at least one user-defined parameter.