×

Closed loop voting feedback

  • US 8,566,144 B2
  • Filed: 03/31/2005
  • Issued: 10/22/2013
  • Est. Priority Date: 03/31/2005
  • Status: Expired due to Fees
First Claim
Patent Images

1. A non-transitory computer-accessible medium having instructions stored thereon that, in response to execution by a computing system having a processor and a memory, cause the computing system to:

  • receive a first plurality of votes corresponding to a decision to be made with respect to an object, wherein at least one of the first plurality of votes is a first vote received from a reviewer;

    based at least in part on the first plurality of received votes, determine a first action to take with respect to the object;

    receive a second plurality of votes corresponding to the decision to be made with respect to the object, wherein at least one of the second plurality of votes is a second vote received from the reviewer;

    based at least in part on the second plurality of received votes, determine a second action to take with respect to the object;

    receive a performance review of the object;

    update a voting results average for the reviewer based at least in part the performance review, the voting results average being a function of a plurality of previously reviewed objects upon which the reviewer has voted;

    update a total voting timeliness average for the reviewer based at least in part on a voting timeliness of the one of the first plurality of received votes and a voting timeliness of the one of the second plurality of received votes;

    update a total voting consistency average for the reviewer based at least in part on;

    a consensus between the one of the first plurality of received votes and a remainder of the first plurality of received votes excluding the one of the first plurality of received votes; and

    a consensus between the one of the second plurality of received votes and a remainder of the second plurality of received votes excluding the one of the second plurality of received votes; and

    calculate a power rating of the reviewer as a function of;

    the voting results average for the reviewer, the total voting timeliness average for the reviewer, and the total voting consistency average for the reviewer.

View all claims
  • 1 Assignment
Timeline View
Assignment View
    ×
    ×