Method of grouping and analyzing clinical risks

• US 8,571,892 B2
• Filed: 08/21/2006
• Issued: 10/29/2013
• Est. Priority Date: 04/29/1999
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: 3M Innovative Properties Company (3M Company)
• Original Assignee: 3M Innovative Properties Company (3M Company)
• Inventors: Averill, Richard Francis, Eisenhandler, Jon, Goldfield, Norbert Israel
• Primary Examiner(s): Dunham, Jason
• Assistant Examiner(s): MISIASZEK, AMBER ALTSCHUL
• Application Number:
  US11/465,901
• Publication Number:
  US 20060287888A1
• Time in Patent Office: 2,626 Days
• Field of Search: 705/2, 705/3
• US Class Current: 705/3
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/10 Office automation; Time management
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 40/02 Banking, e.g. interest calculation or account maintenance credit or loans G06Q40/03
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 40/08 Insurance
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 10/40 for data related to laboratory analysis, e.g. patient specimen analysis
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 10/60 for patient-specific data, e.g. for electronic patient records
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 50/30 for calculating health indices; for individual health risk assessment
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 50/70 for mining of medical data, e.g. analysing previous cases of other patients

Abstract

A method of creating a classification system for rating the nature and severity of health care requirements, including obtaining a set of medical disease codes, categorizing the medical disease codes into major disease categories, and categorizing the medical disease codes in each major disease category into episode disease categories based on severity.

Claims

1. A method of creating a classification system for rating the nature and severity of health care requirements, including:

(a) a computer system obtaining a set of medical disease codes;

(b) categorizing the medical disease codes into major disease categories using the computer system;

(c) categorizing the medical disease codes in each major disease category into episode disease categories based on severity of health care requirements using the computer system;

(d) sub-dividing at least some of the episode disease categories using the computer system by severity of illness level by using severity of illness rules to take into account other episode disease categories or other information not related to a particular episode disease category being subdivided; and

(e) defining criteria using the computer system for assigning an overall clinical risk group to an individual patient, where the criteria takes into account the episode disease categories and severity of illness levels, where the criteria adjusts for the effect of interacting conditions in different episode disease categories.

2. The method of claim 1, step (e) further comprising defining severity of illness levels for each clinical risk group using episode disease categories or other factors.

3. The method of claim 1, step (d) further comprising defining the severity of illness rules for adjusting the severity of illness level for each episode disease category based on the nature and timing of treatment for each episode disease category.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein the severity of illness rules adjust the severity of illness level for each episode disease category based on the recency of other episode disease categories.

5. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

a) providing a set of medical procedure codes;

b) categorizing the medical procedure codes into episode procedure categories;

wherein the severity of illness rules take account of the episode procedure categories in adjusting the severity of illness level for each episode disease category.

6. The method of claim 5, further comprising the step of creating episode disease categories that are indicated by episode procedure categories.

7. The method of claim 1, further comprising defining a set of selection criteria for selecting a primary chronic disease or identifying a lack of a primary chronic disease from the episode disease categories for each major disease category.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein step (e) comprises:

a) defining criteria for a series of risk groups ranked in order of declining clinical significance;

b) comparing the episode disease categories to the criteria for each risk group, and assigning the most severe clinical risk group for which the criteria are met.

9. The method of claim 1, further comprising defining criteria for an overall clinical risk group to a group of patients, where the criteria takes into account the episode disease categories and severity of illness levels.

10. The method of claim 1, further comprising applying the classification system to determining anticipated health care costs for an individual comprising:

a) obtaining historical care data for an individual;

b) determining the episode disease categories for the individual;

c) adjusting the episode disease categories for the individual based on the nature and temporal relationships of the episode disease categories experienced by the individual.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein the adjusting step includes deleting episode disease categories when the temporal relationship between events implies that the disease indicated by an episode disease category has likely been eliminated by subsequent treatment.

12. The method of claim 10, further comprising the steps of:

a) assigning a clinical risk group to the individual based on the adjusted episode disease categories experienced by the individual;

b) identifying from adjusted episode disease categories the primary chronic disease in each major disease categories; and

c) determining the clinical risk group based on the number and type of primary chronic diseases.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein the step of determining the clinical risk group is further based on the presence of catastrophic conditions.

14. The method of claim 12, further comprising the steps:

a) determining the severity of illness level for each primary chronic disease experienced by the individual;

b) setting a severity of illness level for each primary chronic disease based on the nature, temporal relationships and severity of illness levels of the episode disease categories experienced by the individual; and

c) assigning an overall severity of illness for the individual based on the adjusted severity of illness levels for the primary chronic diseases experienced by the individual.

15. Computer storage media containing software which, when executed by a computer, will cause the computer to implement the following steps:

(a) a computer system obtaining a set of medical disease codes;

(b) categorizing the medical disease codes into major disease categories using the computer system;

(c) categorizing the medical disease codes in each major disease category into episode disease categories based on severity of health care requirements using the computer system;

(d) sub-dividing at least some of the episode disease categories using the computer system by severity of illness level by using severity of illness rules to take into account other episode disease categories or other information not related to a particular episode disease category being subdivided; and

(e) defining criteria using the computer system for assigning an overall clinical risk group to an individual patient, where the criteria takes into account the episode disease categories and severity of illness levels, where the criteria adjusts for the effect of interacting conditions in different episode disease categories.

16. A method of creating a classification system for rating the nature and severity of health care requirements, including:

(a) a computer system obtaining a set of medical disease codes;

(b) categorizing the medical disease codes into major disease categories using the computer system;

(c) categorizing the medical disease codes into episode disease categories in each major disease category based on severity of health care requirementsusing the computer system;

(d) obtaining a set of medical procedure codes using the computer system;

(e) categorizing the medical procedure codes into episode procedure categories using the computer system;

(f) sub-dividing at least some of the episode disease categories using the computer system by severity of illness level by using severity of illness rules, wherein the severity of illness rules take into account temporal information including order of occurrence of the episode disease categories and episode procedure categories.

17. The method of claim 16 wherein the severity of illness rules take into account the recency of treatment for episode disease categories.

18. The method of claim 16, further comprising applying the classification system to determining anticipated health care costs for an individual comprising:

a) obtaining historical care data for an individual;

b) determining the episode disease categories for the individual;

c) assigning severity levels to the episode disease categories for the individual based on the nature and temporal relationships of the episode disease categories experienced by the individual.

19. The method of claim 18, wherein the step of assigning severity levels includes deleting episode disease categories when the temporal relationship between events implies that the disease indicated by an episode disease category has likely been eliminated by subsequent treatment.

20. A method of creating a classification system for rating the nature and severity of health care requirements, including:

(a) first, obtaining a set of medical disease codes using the computer system;

(b) second, categorizing the medical disease codes into major disease categories using the computer system, wherein each major disease category corresponds to a single organ system, a malignancy or a multiple trauma;

(c) third, categorizing the medical disease codes in each major disease category into episode disease categories based on severity of health care requirements using the computer system; and

(d) fourth, sub-dividing at least some of the episode disease categories using the computer system by severity of illness level by using severity of illness rules, thereby defining a set of severity of illness levels for each episode disease category.

21. The method of claim 20, wherein the severity of illness rules for adjusting the severity of illness level for each episode disease category are based on the nature of and temporal information about each episode disease category.