Interactive method for helping the driver of a motor vehicle to adopt an economical driving style and vehicle using this method

• US 8,573,976 B2
• Filed: 06/12/2008
• Issued: 11/05/2013
• Est. Priority Date: 06/19/2007
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Peugeot Citroen Automobiles SA (Stellantis NV)
• Original Assignee: Peugeot Citroen Automobiles SA (Stellantis NV)
• Inventors: Lecointre, Bruno, Francais, Yves
• Primary Examiner(s): Frisby, Kesha
• Application Number:
  US12/663,271
• Publication Number:
  US 20100178637A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,972 Days
• Field of Search: 434/29
• US Class Current: 434/29
• CPC Class Codes: B60R 16/0236 for economical driving
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2050/143 Alarm means
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2050/146 Display means
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 50/14 Means for informing the driver, warning the driver or prompting a driver intervention
• CPC Class Codes: F16H 2063/426 with means for advising the driver for proper shift action, e.g. prompting the driver with allowable selection range of ratios
• CPC Class Codes: F16H 63/42 Ratio indicator devices
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 50/40 Business processes related to the transportation industry shipping G06Q10/083
• CPC Class Codes: G09B 9/04 for teaching control of land vehicles
• CPC Class Codes: Y02T 10/84 Data processing systems or methods, management, administration

Abstract

The invention relates to an interactive driving assistance method. This method involves selecting a desired driving style, and analyzing (F1) a driver behavior during a detected life situation. From a memory (5), a recommended driver behavior is then selected for the current life situation corresponding to the desired driving style. The behavior of the driver is then compared (F1, 16) with the recommended behavior, and those aspects of the behavior which are considered to be improvable are identified. Finally an audio and/or video information message (7) is issued (F4, F5, 27) inviting the driver to correct his or her behavior on at least the most critical point.

Claims

1. Computer-implemented interactive driving assistance method to assist the driver of a vehicle, comprising implementing the following algorithm with a computer in the vehicle:

selecting from a database stored in a computer memory a desired driving style, wherein said database includes at least one driving style,

detecting a vehicle scenario by analyzing first data on operation parameters of the vehicle, taken from a communications network of the vehicle,

analyzing a technique of the driver during this scenario by analyzing second data on operation parameters of the vehicle, taken from the communications network of the vehicle,

selecting from the database a recommended driver technique for the scenario, corresponding to the desired driving style, wherein said database includes a plurality of different driver behavior characteristics,

comparing said driver technique with the recommended driver technique, and

identifying points of technique considered to be improvable, and

selecting from the database and transmitting an audio and/or video message with information inviting the driver to correct his technique on at least the most critical point.

2. Method according to claim 1, wherein the desired driving style is a driving style that minimizes fuel consumption.

3. Method according to claim 1, wherein the vehicle scenario is selected from the following:

a deceleration phase with no braking, a deceleration phase with braking, passing, or proceeding at a steady speed.

4. Method according to claim 1, wherein the audio and/or video message is transmitted only if the vehicle scenario is considered to be stable.

5. Method according to claim 4, wherein the improvable technique is memorized in order to enable transmission or retransmission of the message with the corresponding information during a favorable driving situation.

6. Method according to claim 5, wherein the video messages are transmitted only when the vehicle is stopped and the driver does not have his foot on the accelerator pedal.

7. Method according to claim 4, wherein the driving situation is considered to be stable if the vehicle has been in the same scenario for at least 2s and if the driver has his foot on the accelerator pedal.

8. Method according to claim 7, wherein the driving situation is furthermore considered to be unfavorable if the vehicle is turning.

9. Method according to claim 1, wherein said observed points of technique are selected from at least two of the following actions:

accelerator pedal depression, brake pedal activation, choosing a gear ratio, disengaging the clutch.

10. Method according to claim 1, comprising, for each occurrence of a driver technique considered to be improvable, adding an increment to a counter keeping track of improvable techniques.

11. Method according to claim 10, wherein, additionally, associated with each observed point of technique is a specific point counter, the method comprising incrementing a count of the specific point counter each time an improvable technique is detected that could be improved by an action addressing this point of technique.

12. Method according to claim 11, wherein, when the counter keeping tracks improvable techniques reaches a certain threshold, a message is transmitted with the aim of improving the point of technique whose counter has the highest count, thereby inviting the driver to correct his technique on at least the most critical point of technique.

13. Method according to claim 10, wherein the number of occurrences of scenarios is also memorized using another counter in order to develop statistics on the frequency of improvable techniques.

14. Method according to claim 13, wherein all information from the counters and the statistics is memorized in order to enable a comparison of techniques before and after the transmission of a message.

15. Method according to claim 13, wherein the counters are reset to zero at the driver'"'"'s request, via a button or by selecting options given by an onboard computer.

16. Method according to claim 10, wherein all of the information from counters, memories, and statistics can be downloaded to a computer not in the vehicle.

17. Method according to claim 1, comprising two levels of deactivation:

a standby mode in which no messages are transmitted but analysis of improvable techniques continues, and

an inactive mode in which all the functions of the assistant are deactivated.

18. Method according to claim 17, comprising:

distinguishing between the two levels of deactivation by means of a button with three positions, for active/standby/inactive, or

by means of a push button, where each press of the button causes it to switch from active to standby, from standby to inactive, and from inactive to active, or

by means of an option on the onboard computer.

19. Method according to claim 1, which is constructed so that it cannot be deactivated.

20. Method according to claim 1, wherein the database for selecting the desired driving style includes a plurality of different driving styles.

21. Method according to claim 20, wherein the desired driving style is selected from minimum fuel-consumption driving style, medium level fuel consumption driving style, and vehicle speed optimization driving style.

22. Motor vehicle employing the method defined according to claim 1.