Programmed classroom instruction
First Claim
1. A computer-implemented classroom programming method for overseeing and adjusting and strengthening the instruction by a teacher and learning by students during an academic year with respect to one or more topics of study for a grade level over a plurality of successive evaluation periods, comprising the steps of:
- analyzing a subject matter of an academic course of study in detail and subsequently breaking down the totality of knowledge of the subject matter that the teacher is expected to teach and each student is expected to learn during said academic year into a plurality of discretely defined behavioral performances that are designed to be readily and objectively recognized as being mastered or not by the student;
storing the plurality of discretely defined behavioral performances into a computer system comprising at least a first computerized database system which organizes the plurality of discretely defined behavioral performances on the basis of structural and functional groupings as well as conventional levels of difficulty or advancement, said first computerized database system storing a teaching and learning state score respectively for each of said plurality of discretely defined behavioral performances, said teaching and learning state score comprising a selected one of successive first, second and third scores wherein said teaching and learning state score is changeable successively from said first score to said second score and then from said second score to said third score to indicate a current state of teaching and learning, said first score indicating that instruction has not begun and learning has not begun, said second score indicating that instruction has begun but actual learning is not complete, and said third score indicating that instruction and actual learning are complete, each one of the plurality of discretely defined behavioral performances having said teaching and learning state score initially being set to said first score for each of said plurality of discretely defined behavioral performances in said first computerized database system prior to instruction thereof during said academic year wherein said first score represents that instruction has not begun and learning has not begun;
subdividing said grade level into a plurality of progress intervals wherein each said progress interval is subdivided into a plurality of said evaluation periods;
for each specified one of said evaluation periods of the classroom, developing a teaching and learning plan by designating one or more of the discretely defined behavioral performances stored in the first computerized database as learning objectives for said teaching and learning plan that are to be taught by the teacher and learned by the students during said evaluation period;
after said designation of said learning objectives of said teaching and learning plan, changing said teaching and learning state score for each respective one of said learning objectives by successively replacing said first score in said first computerized database with said second score to represent that instruction of each said learning objective has begun but actual learning is not complete;
instructing said learning objectives of said teaching and learning plan during said evaluation period;
through the end of each specified one of said evaluation periods, said teacher evaluating a performance of each student during said specified evaluation period to determine an actual ability of each of the students during the course of said evaluation period to carry out the one or more discretely defined behavioral performances designated as said learning objectives over the course of the evaluation period and recording the results of the evaluation in real time into the first computerized database system by either retaining said second score as said teaching and learning state score or else replacing said second score with said third score to indicate whether each of the teachers and students has progressed from teaching and learning not complete to teaching and learning complete for each of the learning objectives, said recording being performed by either changing said teaching and learning state score by replacing said second score with said third score for each said learning objective evaluated as teaching and learning complete, or else maintaining said teaching and learning state score as said second score for each said learning objective evaluated as teaching and learning not complete;
automatically generating a dynamic classroom teaching chart by said computer system during said evaluation period providing a real time visual representation of each of the student'"'"'s learning progress for one or more of the learning objectives for the specified evaluation period wherein said real time visual representation corresponds to the selected one of said first, second and third scores currently stored as said teaching and learning state score;
updating said dynamic classroom teaching chart continuously during said evaluation period upon each change of a said student'"'"'s learning progress from teaching and learning not complete to teaching and learning complete for each of said learning objectives by changing said teaching and learning state score by replacing said second score with said third score for each said learning objective evaluated as learning complete;
visually presenting said dynamic classroom teaching chart by said computer system on a display during the course of said evaluation period to automatically show each update of said dynamic classroom teaching chart upon each change of a said student'"'"'s learning progress and to show the current teaching and learning state status of said learning objectives as learned as indicated by said third score or not learned as indicated by said second score; and
said computer system including a second computerized database system, wherein at the end of each specified evaluation period, automatically transferring the recorded results of the evaluation from said first computerized database system to said second computerized database system that collects evaluation results for each teacher and student, for every evaluation period, for every class, and automatically organizes the plurality of collected evaluation results into an interactive learning management report that is presented to a reviewer in real time to display a variety of levels of detail ranging from a specific level, including a specific subject matter for a specific teacher and student, to a general level of detail, including the overall performance of a classroom or school over a specified period of time;
continual parent or guardian oversight of the teacher'"'"'s and student'"'"'s progress and performance is maintained by the additional steps of;
generating a preview report at the beginning of each specified evaluation period respectively for the teacher and each student and distributing the respective preview report to at least one parent or guardian of each student, said preview report listing each of the learning objectives designated for instruction for the specified evaluation period for said student;
generating an evaluation report at the end of each specified evaluation period respectively for the teacher and each student and distributing the respective evaluation report to at least one parent or guardian of each student, said evaluation report listing each of the learning objectives designated for instruction for the specified evaluation period along with the associated evaluation results of the teacher'"'"'s and student'"'"'s performance for the specified evaluation period as indicated by said teaching and learning state score for each of said learning objectives.
0 Assignments
0 Petitions
Accused Products
Abstract
A computer-implemented method of overseeing and adjusting the instruction and evaluation of a student with respect to one or more topics of study within a classroom. The subject matter of an academic course is studied and broken down into a plurality of discretely defined behavioral performances designed to be readily and objectively recognized as being mastered or not by a student. One or more of the discretely defined behavioral performances are then selected, with the aid of a first computerized database system, as learning objectives for the week. At the end of the week, a student is subsequently evaluated on these objectives. Results of the evaluation are then transferred to a second computerized database system, which organizes the collected data into an interactive learning management report that can be configured by a reviewer in real time to display a variety of levels of detail.
63 Citations
23 Claims
-
1. A computer-implemented classroom programming method for overseeing and adjusting and strengthening the instruction by a teacher and learning by students during an academic year with respect to one or more topics of study for a grade level over a plurality of successive evaluation periods, comprising the steps of:
-
analyzing a subject matter of an academic course of study in detail and subsequently breaking down the totality of knowledge of the subject matter that the teacher is expected to teach and each student is expected to learn during said academic year into a plurality of discretely defined behavioral performances that are designed to be readily and objectively recognized as being mastered or not by the student; storing the plurality of discretely defined behavioral performances into a computer system comprising at least a first computerized database system which organizes the plurality of discretely defined behavioral performances on the basis of structural and functional groupings as well as conventional levels of difficulty or advancement, said first computerized database system storing a teaching and learning state score respectively for each of said plurality of discretely defined behavioral performances, said teaching and learning state score comprising a selected one of successive first, second and third scores wherein said teaching and learning state score is changeable successively from said first score to said second score and then from said second score to said third score to indicate a current state of teaching and learning, said first score indicating that instruction has not begun and learning has not begun, said second score indicating that instruction has begun but actual learning is not complete, and said third score indicating that instruction and actual learning are complete, each one of the plurality of discretely defined behavioral performances having said teaching and learning state score initially being set to said first score for each of said plurality of discretely defined behavioral performances in said first computerized database system prior to instruction thereof during said academic year wherein said first score represents that instruction has not begun and learning has not begun; subdividing said grade level into a plurality of progress intervals wherein each said progress interval is subdivided into a plurality of said evaluation periods; for each specified one of said evaluation periods of the classroom, developing a teaching and learning plan by designating one or more of the discretely defined behavioral performances stored in the first computerized database as learning objectives for said teaching and learning plan that are to be taught by the teacher and learned by the students during said evaluation period; after said designation of said learning objectives of said teaching and learning plan, changing said teaching and learning state score for each respective one of said learning objectives by successively replacing said first score in said first computerized database with said second score to represent that instruction of each said learning objective has begun but actual learning is not complete; instructing said learning objectives of said teaching and learning plan during said evaluation period; through the end of each specified one of said evaluation periods, said teacher evaluating a performance of each student during said specified evaluation period to determine an actual ability of each of the students during the course of said evaluation period to carry out the one or more discretely defined behavioral performances designated as said learning objectives over the course of the evaluation period and recording the results of the evaluation in real time into the first computerized database system by either retaining said second score as said teaching and learning state score or else replacing said second score with said third score to indicate whether each of the teachers and students has progressed from teaching and learning not complete to teaching and learning complete for each of the learning objectives, said recording being performed by either changing said teaching and learning state score by replacing said second score with said third score for each said learning objective evaluated as teaching and learning complete, or else maintaining said teaching and learning state score as said second score for each said learning objective evaluated as teaching and learning not complete; automatically generating a dynamic classroom teaching chart by said computer system during said evaluation period providing a real time visual representation of each of the student'"'"'s learning progress for one or more of the learning objectives for the specified evaluation period wherein said real time visual representation corresponds to the selected one of said first, second and third scores currently stored as said teaching and learning state score; updating said dynamic classroom teaching chart continuously during said evaluation period upon each change of a said student'"'"'s learning progress from teaching and learning not complete to teaching and learning complete for each of said learning objectives by changing said teaching and learning state score by replacing said second score with said third score for each said learning objective evaluated as learning complete; visually presenting said dynamic classroom teaching chart by said computer system on a display during the course of said evaluation period to automatically show each update of said dynamic classroom teaching chart upon each change of a said student'"'"'s learning progress and to show the current teaching and learning state status of said learning objectives as learned as indicated by said third score or not learned as indicated by said second score; and said computer system including a second computerized database system, wherein at the end of each specified evaluation period, automatically transferring the recorded results of the evaluation from said first computerized database system to said second computerized database system that collects evaluation results for each teacher and student, for every evaluation period, for every class, and automatically organizes the plurality of collected evaluation results into an interactive learning management report that is presented to a reviewer in real time to display a variety of levels of detail ranging from a specific level, including a specific subject matter for a specific teacher and student, to a general level of detail, including the overall performance of a classroom or school over a specified period of time; continual parent or guardian oversight of the teacher'"'"'s and student'"'"'s progress and performance is maintained by the additional steps of; generating a preview report at the beginning of each specified evaluation period respectively for the teacher and each student and distributing the respective preview report to at least one parent or guardian of each student, said preview report listing each of the learning objectives designated for instruction for the specified evaluation period for said student; generating an evaluation report at the end of each specified evaluation period respectively for the teacher and each student and distributing the respective evaluation report to at least one parent or guardian of each student, said evaluation report listing each of the learning objectives designated for instruction for the specified evaluation period along with the associated evaluation results of the teacher'"'"'s and student'"'"'s performance for the specified evaluation period as indicated by said teaching and learning state score for each of said learning objectives. - View Dependent Claims (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19)
-
-
20. A computer implemented method to equip distant school administrators to remotely establish, monitor and assure an annual production of learning over a school year by one or multiple classrooms each comprising teacher and student participants, the method comprising the steps of:
-
remotely developing an academic plan by employment of a computer system comprising a computerized primary classroom database system and a computerized secondary remote database system, and imposing upon the classroom with said remote database system a detailed, unambiguous annual assignment of learning requirements for the production of learning by the classroom; remotely standardizing, regulating and overseeing expected result, procedural sequences and schedule of the classroom learning production, said classroom learning production being implemented by a computer-based learning production process implemented by said primary classroom database system and said secondary remote database system; remotely measuring the classroom learning production by recording individual teaching and learning objectives by said primary classroom database system and measuring teaching and learning progress and teaching and learning results in the classroom by said secondary remote database system which automatically receives and processes data received from said primary classroom database system; integrating a system of real-time recording and tracking of learning and teaching production in the classroom into the learning production process by recording and tracking teaching and learning with said primary classroom database system; automatically and remotely adjusting the progress of teaching to variations in the progress of learning; and remotely tracking and assimilating learning production throughout the school year in one or multiple classrooms by said secondary remote database system; wherein measuring the classroom learning production by measuring teaching and learning progress and teaching and learning results in the classroom is remotely accomplished by the additional steps of; management employing a measurement structure with features sensitive to the condition that;
(1) classroom learning production is the terminal result of an extended cooperative joint process of teacher and student that can be termed “
teaching and learning”
;
(2) measurement incorporates identification of this cooperative process, as well as theindividual contribution of the teacher and student participants, as well as the final result of the individual and combined effort of the teacher and student participants;
(3) defining features of performance measures are sufficiently clear and distinct to assure high measurement reliability;
(4) units of measurement are suitable to sensitively detect the small changes of progress which may occur in brief classroom intervals;
(5) the units of measurement are suitable to aggregate across many observations; and
(6) the measures are a three term nominal measurement scale of three categories, comprising categories A, B and C respectively defined by states “
0”
, “
1”
or “
2”
wherein;
category A corresponds to said state “
0”
which equals “
teaching (instruction) and learning not begun”
which is the state existing when the classroom is in session but neither said state 1 nor said state 2 exist;
category B corresponds to said state “
1”
which equals “
teaching (instruction) and learning begun”
which is the measured state existing when the classroom is in session, the teacher has introduced the required learning performance objective to a specific student but state “
2”
does not exist for the particular objective; and
category C corresponds to state “
2”
which equals “
teaching (instruction) and learning complete”
which is the measured state existing when the classroom is in session, the teacher has introduced a required learning performance objective to a specific student and the teacher concludes teaching and that student demonstrates complete performance of the learning performance objective; and
wherein the step of remotely standardizing, regulating and overseeing the procedural sequences and schedule of the classroom learning production are accomplished by the additional steps of;management assigning to the classroom, intermediate materials and activities required to produce completed teaching and learning in the form of a classroom computer guidance system defined by said primary classroom database system and comprising a series of interactive classroom objectives display screens, which prompt management-specified teacher performance, in a management specified fixed order, according to management specified time periods throughout the school year; and by interconnection with additional computer systems defined by said secondary remote database system at other management stations, maintaining real-time oversight of each step and result of the classroom learning production by; 1) establishing as a first required step, that the teacher designate on a computer system provided WEEKLY PREVIEW screen, each teaching and learning objective of a current weekly production cycle from a library of objectives to define a planned weekly production schedule, then composing parent announcements, on the computer system provided WEEKLY PREVIEW screen, then posting a completed production schedule, automatically by printed report to all parents, and automatically by computer network to all management stations;
said posting also entering, automatically for all students, a score of “
1”
on a computer system provided WEEKLY EVALUATION REPORT, without additional query and thereby recording “
teaching and learning has begun”
there on the classroom computer guidance system as a learning state score of “
1” and
also to said secondary remote database system accessed at the remote management stations to indicate that the teaching and learning has begun;2) the teacher and students thereafter commencing teaching and learning of each designated objective for the weekly learning production cycle, and entering and revising said teaching and learning state scores before the end of the weekly learning production cycle; 3) choosing one of the designated weekly objectives listed on the interactive display screen for a CLASSROOM TEACHING CHART and, entering in said primary classroom database system for each student a “
1”
as teaching and learning for that student commences, proceeding thereafter through each designated objective in the “
1”
state of teaching and learning, while simultaneously observing and recording with each student whether learning is mastered or not and when present, entering a score of “
2”
in said primary classroom database system indicating “
teaching and learning complete”
which is automatically posted by said computer system without additional query to the classroom WEEKLY EVALUATION REPORT and remote management station computers; and4) at the end of the weekly learning production cycle, referencing the WEEKLY EVALUATION REPORT, auditing the compiled teaching and learning state scores for every designated objective, and for each attending student, composing and entering parent production results announcements therein, and posting the WEEKLY EVALUATION REPORT automatically by communications to parents and automatically without additional query in real time by computer network to all of the management stations, such that a manager is continuously informed of the planned weekly production schedule, as well as minute by minute progress through the production schedule and the end-of-week schedule production results. - View Dependent Claims (21, 22, 23)
-
Specification