Safety promoting techniques for mobile communication

• US 8,644,812 B2
• Filed: 12/31/2010
• Issued: 02/04/2014
• Est. Priority Date: 01/11/2010
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Florida Atlantic University (State University System of Florida)
• Original Assignee: Florida Atlantic University (State University System of Florida)
• Inventors: Raviv, Daniel
• Primary Examiner(s): Nguyen, David Q
• Application Number:
  US12/930,246
• Publication Number:
  US 20110171943A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,131 Days
• Field of Search: 455/418, 455/456, 455/67, 455/466
• US Class Current: 455/418
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 24/00 Supervisory, monitoring or testing arrangements
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 48/04 based on user or terminal location or mobility data, e.g. moving direction, speed

Abstract

A method for controlling operation of an active mobile communication device, including the following steps: performing a first determination of whether the device is in a moving vehicle at a relevant location; performing a second determination of whether the user of the device is the vehicle operator; and producing a risk indication signal as a function of the first and second determinations.

Claims

1. A method for controlling operation of an active mobile communication device, comprising the following steps implemented using a machine processor:

performing a first determination of whether said device is in a moving vehicle, including determining the relative position of said device in the vehicle;

performing a second determination of whether the user of said device is the vehicle operator, said second determination including determining the presence of a proximity group of communication devices, and determining the relative position of said active mobile device in said proximity group; and

producing a risk indication signal as a function of said first and second determinations.

2. The method as defined by claim 1, wherein said determining of the relative position of said active mobile device is performed at a plurality of times.

3. The method as defined by claim 2, wherein said relative positions obtained at a plurality of times are interpolated to obtain a refined relative position.

4. The method as defined by claim 1, wherein said determining of the relative position of said active mobile device in said proximity group is performed with respect to the direction of motion of the proximity group.

5. The method as define by claim 1, further comprising disabling at least one function of said device in response to said risk indication signal.

6. The method as defined by claim 5, wherein said at least one function comprises a tactile input function.

7. The method as defined by claim 6, wherein said tactile input function comprises manual texting.

8. The method as described by claim 1, wherein said risk indication signal comprises a conditional disabling signal, and further comprising disabling at least one function of said device in response to said risk indication signal when a predetermined condition has been met.

9. The method as defined by claim 8, wherein said predetermined conditions include at least one factor selected from the group consisting of geographical features at the location of the vehicle, traffic, weather conditions, and time of day.

10. The method as defined by claim 1, wherein said step of performing said first determination includes determining the speed of said moving vehicle, and wherein said risk indication signal is also a function of said determined speed.

11. The method as defined by claim 1, wherein said first determination and/or said second determination are determined using probabilities.

12. The method as defined by claim 11, wherein said first determination and/or said second determination is determined by detecting whether said probabilities exceed predetermined thresholds.

13. The method as defined by claim 1, wherein said step of performing said first determination includes determining the velocity of motion of the device, and determining, using other inputs, whether the device is in an operator-controlled vehicle.

14. The method as defined by claim 13, wherein said other inputs include geographical inputs relating to the vehicle and/or device location.

15. The method as defined by claim 1, wherein said performing of said second determination includes spatial and/or temporal computations from which the relative position of the device in a vehicle can be determined.

16. The method as defined by claim 1, wherein said risk indication signal is generated at a remote mobile communication station and transmitted to said device.