Reduced transmit power for wireless radio coexistence

• US 8,655,400 B2
• Filed: 09/14/2011
• Issued: 02/18/2014
• Est. Priority Date: 09/22/2010
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Qualcomm, Inc.
• Original Assignee: Qualcomm, Inc.
• Inventors: Kadous, Tamer Adel, He, Xiaoyin, Dayal, Pranav, Mantravadi, Ashok, Wang, Jibing
• Primary Examiner(s): Lee, John J
• Application Number:
  US13/232,547
• Publication Number:
  US 20120071106A1
• Time in Patent Office: 888 Days
• Field of Search: 455/67.11, 455/522, 455/69, 455/63.1, 455/67.13, 455/452.1, 455/452.2, 455/41.2, 455/126, 455/127.1, 455/501, 455/517
• US Class Current: 455/522
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 16/14 Spectrum sharing arrangements between different networks
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 52/16 Deriving transmission power values from another channel
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 52/18 TPC being performed according to specific parameters
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 52/38 TPC being performed in particular situations

Abstract

In user equipments (UEs) with multiple radios, interference between those radios may be reduced by monitoring radio performance and adjusting aggressor transmit power levels to ensure victim and aggressor performance stay within desired operational levels. Various factors may determine when a reduced power approach is desired. Such factors may include aggressor transmit power, received signal strength indicator, victim error rate, throughput loss, coverage impact, etc. Various methods of reducing transmit power may be used. For example, for Long Term Evolution communications, a power headroom report may be altered to adjust a modulation coding scheme and bandwidth allocated for a particular UE. For Bluetooth communications a power control mechanism may be overridden to ensure a device stays within a desired transmit power. A power reduction loop may be employed to monitor a device'"'"'s transmit power.

Claims

1. A method for wireless communication, comprising:

determining a performance metric of an aggressor radio and a performance metric of a victim radio; and

dynamically setting a non-zero maximum transmit power of the aggressor radio based on at least one of the performance metric of the victim radio and the performance metric of the aggressor radio in order to meet target performance criteria for the victim radio and aggressor radio.

2. The method of claim 1 further comprising adjusting the target performance criteria based on a relative priority of communications of the victim and aggressor radios.

3. The method of claim 1 further comprising adjusting the target performance criteria based on communication conditions of at least one of the victim and aggressor radios.

4. The method of claim 1, further comprising setting a lowest amount of maximum aggressor transmit power to meet a threshold defined by a maximum performance loss of the aggressor radio.

5. The method of claim 1, further comprising sending a report of a gap between a current aggressor transmit power and a maximum aggressor transmit power used for power and rate control, based on the maximum aggressor transmit power.

6. The method of claim 1, in which the performance metric of the victim radio comprises at least one of a level of interference observed at the victim radio, a throughput loss observed at the victim radio, an error rate observed at the victim radio, and a received signal strength indicator (RSSI) observed at the victim radio.

7. The method of claim 1, in which the performance metric of the aggressor radio comprises at least one of aggressor throughput, an error rate observed at the aggressor radio, and a delay observed at the aggressor radio.

8. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

resetting the maximum transmit power to ignore the performance metric of the victim radio when observing unacceptable performance at the aggressor radio while the maximum transmit power is at a lowest amount of maximum power to meet a performance threshold; and

invoking an alternative coexistence solution.

9. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

resetting the maximum transmit power to ignore the performance metric of the victim radio when the aggressor radio needs additional power due to a coverage issue; and

invoking an alternative coexistence solution.

10. The method of claim 1, in which the aggressor radio comprises one of a long term evolution (LTE) radio, Bluetooth radio, and wireless local area network (WLAN) radio.

11. An apparatus for wireless communications, comprising:

means for determining a performance metric of an aggressor radio and a performance metric of a victim radio; and

means for dynamically setting a non-zero maximum transmit power of the aggressor radio based on at least one of the performance metric of the victim radio and the performance metric of the aggressor radio in order to meet target performance criteria for the victim radio and aggressor radio.

12. A computer program product configured for wireless communication, the computer program product comprising:

a non-transitory computer-readable medium having non-transitory program code recorded thereon, the non-transitory program code comprising;

program code to determine a performance metric of an aggressor radio and a performance metric of a victim radio; and

program code to dynamically set a non-zero maximum transmit power of the aggressor radio based on at least one of the performance metric of the victim radio and the performance metric of the aggressor radio in order to meet target performance criteria for the victim radio and aggressor radio.

13. An apparatus configured for wireless communication, the apparatus comprising:

a memory; and

at least one processor coupled to the memory, the at least one processor being configured;

to determine a performance metric of an aggressor radio and a performance metric of a victim radio; and

to dynamically set a non-zero maximum transmit power of the aggressor radio based on at least one of the performance metric of the victim radio and the performance metric of the aggressor radio in order to meet target performance criteria for the victim radio and aggressor radio.

14. The apparatus of claim 13 in which the at least one processor is further configured to adjust the target performance criteria based on a relative priority of communications of the victim and aggressor radios.

15. The apparatus of claim 13 in which the at least one processor is further configured to adjust the target performance criteria based on communication conditions of at least one of the victim and aggressor radios.

16. The apparatus of claim 13, in which the at least one processor is further configured to set a lowest amount of maximum aggressor transmit power to meet a threshold defined by a maximum performance loss of the aggressor radio.

17. The apparatus of claim 13, in which the at least one processor is further configured to send a report of a gap between a current aggressor transmit power and a maximum aggressor transmit power used for power and rate control, based on the maximum aggressor transmit power.

18. The apparatus of claim 13, in which the performance metric of the victim radio comprises at least one of a level of interference observed at the victim radio, a throughput loss observed at the victim radio, an error rate observed at the victim radio, and a received signal strength indicator (RSSI) observed at the victim radio.

19. The apparatus of claim 13, in which the performance metric of the aggressor radio comprises at least one of aggressor throughput, an error rate observed at the aggressor radio, and a delay observed at the aggressor radio.

20. The apparatus of claim 13, in which the at least one processor is further configured:

to reset the maximum transmit power to ignore the performance metric of the victim radio when observing unacceptable performance at the aggressor radio while the maximum transmit power is at a lowest amount of maximum power to meet a performance threshold; and

to invoke an alternative coexistence solution.

21. The apparatus of claim 13, in which the at least one processor is further configured:

to reset the maximum transmit power to ignore the performance metric of the victim radio when the aggressor radio needs additional power due to a coverage issue; and

to invoke an alternative coexistence solution.

22. The apparatus of claim 13, in which the aggressor radio comprises one of a long term evolution (LTE) radio, Bluetooth radio, and wireless local area network (WLAN) radio.