Segment size determination

• US 8,670,416 B2
• Filed: 02/06/2012
• Issued: 03/11/2014
• Est. Priority Date: 02/06/2012
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: General Electric Company
• Original Assignee: General Electric Company
• Inventors: Ree, Bradley Richard, LaFrance, Ryan Marc
• Primary Examiner(s): Masur, Paul H
• Assistant Examiner(s): PHILLIPS, MICHAEL K
• Application Number:
  US13/367,221
• Publication Number:
  US 20130201839A1
• Time in Patent Office: 764 Days
• Field of Search: 370/252, 370/254, 370/255, 370/332, 370/333, 370/470, 370/472, 709/221, 709/232
• US Class Current: 370/333
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 43/0847 Transmission error
• CPC Class Codes: Y04S 40/00 Systems for electrical power generation, transmission, distribution or end-user application management characterised by the use of communication or information technologies, or communication or information technology specific aspects supporting them

Abstract

A method is provided that includes determining, via data processing circuitry, error rate metrics of data transmissions over a constrained application protocol (CoAP) using a first CoAP segment size. The method further includes determining, via the data processing circuitry, a second CoAP segment size for the data transmissions based at least in part upon the error rate metrics.

Claims

1. A method, comprising:

determining, via data processing circuitry, error rate metrics of data transmissions over a constrained application protocol (CoAP) using a first CoAP segment size;

determining, via the data processing circuitry, a second CoAP segment size for the data transmissions based at least in part upon the error rate metrics;

wherein determining the error rate metrics comprises determining a current error rate of the data transmissions and determining a historical average of error rates of the data transmissions and wherein determining the second CoAP segment size comprises;

weighting the current error rate to obtain a weighted current error rate;

weighting the historical average of error rates to obtain a weighted average;

summing the weighted current error rate and the weighted historical average to obtain a manipulated variable; and

correlating the manipulated variable with a corresponding CoAP segment size to obtain the second CoAP segment size.

2. The method of claim 1, comprising modifying the data transmissions to use the second CoAP segment size.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the second CoAP segment size comprises reducing the first CoAP segment size when the current error rate is above a maximum error rate threshold.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the second CoAP segment size comprises increasing the first CoAP segment size when the current error rate is below a minimum error rate threshold.

5. The method of claim 1 comprising continually determining the second CoAP segment size by:

subtracting the manipulated variable from the current error rate;

summing the weighted current error rate and the weighted average to obtain the manipulated variable; and

correlating the manipulated variable with the corresponding CoAP segment size to obtain a new second CoAP segment size.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the error rate metrics comprises determining a derivative of the current error rate, and wherein determining the second CoAP segment size comprises adding the derivative of the current error rate to the manipulated variable prior to correlating the manipulated variable with the corresponding CoAP segment size.

7. A method, comprising:

determining, via data processing circuitry, error rate metrics of data transmissions over a constrained application protocol (CoAP) using a first CoAP segment size;

determining, via the data processing circuitry, a second CoAP segment size for the data transmissions based at least in part upon the error rate metrics;

wherein determining the error rate metrics comprises determining a current error rate of the data transmissions and determining a historical average of error rates, and wherein determining the second CoAP segment size comprises;

weighting the current error rate to obtain a weighted current error rate;

weighting the historical average of error rates to obtain a weighted average;

determining a ratio of the weighted current error rate and the weighted average; and

determining a CoAP segment size modification based upon the ratio.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein determining the CoAP segment size modification comprises querying a lookup table based upon the ratio to obtain a corresponding CoAP segment size.

9. The method of claim 7, wherein determining the CoAP segment size modification comprises decreasing the CoAP segment size when the ratio is positive and over a maximum ratio threshold.

10. The method of claim 9, comprising decreasing the CoAP segment size in increments of a maximum transmission unit size of a 6LoWPAN layer of the CoAP.

11. The method of claim 9, wherein determining the CoAP segment size modification comprises increasing the CoAP segment size when the ratio is negative and under a minimum ratio threshold.

12. The method of claim 11, comprising increasing the CoAP segment size in increments of a maximum transmission unit size of a 6LoWPAN layer of the CoAP.

13. A system, comprising:

a utility meter configured to;

measure consumption of at least one utility resource;

communicate data relating to the energy consumption over a constrained application protocol (CoAP) configured to divide the data into CoAP segments of a CoAP segment size;

determine error rate metrics of communications over the CoAP;

determine a current error rate of the communications;

determine a historical average of error rates of the communications;

determine a CoAP segment size modification based upon the error rate metrics by;

weighting the current error rate to obtain a weighted current error rate;

weighting the historical average of error rates to obtain a weighted average;

summing the weighted current error rate and the weighted historical average to obtain a manipulated variable; and

correlating the manipulated variable with a corresponding CoAP segment size; and

modify the CoAP segment size based upon the CoAP segment size modification.

14. The system of claim 13, comprising a lookup table configured to correlate a plurality of manipulated variables with a plurality of CoAP segment sizes.

15. An article of manufacture, comprising:

one or more non-transitory, tangible, machine-readable media configured to store processor-executable instructions, the instructions comprising;

instructions to;

determine error rate metrics of communications over a constrained application protocol (CoAP) using a CoAP segment size;

determine a current error rate of the communications; and

determine a historical average of error rates of the communications;

instructions to;

determine a CoAP segment size modification based upon the error rate metrics by;

weighting the current error rate to obtain a weighted current error rate;

weighting the historical average of error rates to obtain a weighted historical average;

summing the weighted current error rate and the weighted historical average to obtain a manipulated variable; and

correlating the manipulated variable with a corresponding CoAP segment size; and

instructions to;

modify the CoAP segment size based upon the CoAP segment size modification.

16. The article of manufacture of claim 15, comprising instructions to determine the CoAP segment size modification based upon a current weighted error rate of the communications, a weighted average of error rates of the communications over a period of time, or both.

17. The article of manufacture of claim 15, comprising instructions to determine the CoAP segment size modification based upon a ratio of a current error rate of the communications to an average of error rates of the communications over a period of time.