Method for evaluating video quality

• US 8,670,627 B2
• Filed: 02/14/2011
• Issued: 03/11/2014
• Est. Priority Date: 02/23/2010
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Thomson Licensing (Vantiva SA)
• Original Assignee: Thomson Licensing (Vantiva SA)
• Inventors: Robert, Arnaud, Mueller, Stefan, Weitbruch, Sbastien
• Primary Examiner(s): Patel, Jayesh A
• Application Number:
  US12/931,905
• Publication Number:
  US 20110206298A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,121 Days
• Field of Search: 382/103, 382/168, 382/236, 382/266, 382/294
• US Class Current: 382/236
• CPC Class Codes: H04N 17/004 for digital television systems

Abstract

A method for evaluating video quality of a video stream comprising the steps of

• a) calculating, for at least a first frame of a series of frames from said video stream, a true value of at least one video quality-related parameter associated to said first frame;
• b) calculating a predicted value of said video quality-related parameter for at least a second frame from said series of frames based on said true value associated to said first frame;
• c) calculating a true value of said video quality-related parameter associated to said second frame; and
• d) judging the video quality of said second frame based on a difference between true and predicted values of the at least one video quality-related parameter associated to said second frame.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating video quality of a video stream comprising the steps of:

a) calculating, for at least a first frame of a series of frames from said video stream, a true value of at least one video quality-related parameter associated with said first frame;

b) calculating a predicted value of said video quality-related parameter for at least a second frame out of said series of frames, the prediction being based on said true value associated with said first frame;

c) calculating a true value of said video quality-related parameter associated with said second frame; and

d) judging the video quality of said second frame based on the difference between true and predicted values of the at least one video quality-related parameter associated with said second frame, wherein the steps a) to c) are carried out for a plurality of video quality-related parameters, and the judging step d) is based on the differences between true and predicted values of all said parameters.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein said predicted values are calculated using a Kalman filter.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein steps a), b), c) and d) are iterated, and a frame used as a second frame in one of said iterations is used as one of said first frames in a subsequent iteration.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the second frame is a successor of said at least one first frame in said series of frames.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the second frame is a predecessor of said at least one first frame in said series of frames.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein said plurality of video quality related parameters comprise more than one of contrast, edge contrast ratio, histogram difference or noise intensity.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein step d) comprises the steps of normalizing said differences and

calculating a sum based on said normalized differences.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the judgment of step d) is carried out only if at least ten first frames are available for calculating the predicted value in step b).

9. The method of claim 1, wherein in step d) the second frame is provisionally judged to be defective if said difference exceeds a predetermined threshold.

10. A method for evaluating video quality of a video stream comprising the steps of

a) defining a first series of frames and a second series of frames;

b) calculating, for at least a first frame of the first series of frames from said video stream, a true value of at least one video quality-related parameter associated with said at least first frame of the first series of frames;

c) initializing a first filter based on said true value of the at least one video quality-related parameter associated with the first series of frames;

d) filtering at least a second frame of the first series of frames using the first filter;

e) calculating, for at least a first frame of the second series of frames from said video stream, a true value of at least one video quality-related parameter associated with said at least first frame of the second series of frames;

f) initializing a second filter based on said true value of at least one video quality-related parameter associated with the at least first frame of the second series of frames;

g) filtering frames of the first series of frames using said second filter;

h) judging the video quality of said at least first frame of the first series of frames to be defective if a difference between said calculated true values and values obtained by filtering the first series of frames using the second filter exceeds a predetermined value;

i) removing from said first series of frames any frame judged to be defective;

j) modifying said first series of frames by adding subsequent frames to replace said removed frames of the first series of frames; and

m) repeating steps c) and d) on the modified first series of frames.