Methods and systems for continually measuring the length of a train operating in a positive train control environment

• US 8,688,297 B2
• Filed: 11/09/2011
• Issued: 04/01/2014
• Est. Priority Date: 11/10/2010
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Australian Rail Track Corp. Ltd. (Government of Australia)
• Original Assignee: Lockheed Martin Corporation (Martin Marietta Corporation)
• Inventors: Morris, Charles W.
• Primary Examiner(s): Shafi, Muhammad
• Application Number:
  US13/292,621
• Publication Number:
  US 20120116616A1
• Time in Patent Office: 874 Days
• Field of Search: 701/2, 701/22, 455/130, 342/357.66, 342/357.62
• US Class Current: 701/19
• CPC Class Codes: B61L 15/0054 Train integrity supervision, e.g. end-of-train [EOT] devices
• CPC Class Codes: B61L 15/0072 On-board train data handling

Abstract

Methods and systems for continually measuring the length of a train operating in a positive train control environment are provided. Particularly, the methods and systems provided herein equate repetitive line of sight ranging measurements from the head end to the rear end of a train with the physically draped length of the train along a mapped track with various horizontal and vertical curvature characteristics.

Claims

1. A system for determining the integrity of a train in real-time by continually monitoring a train length between a first car of the train and a second car of the train, the system comprising:

an interrogator at the first car of the train that transmits a communication signal;

a transponder at the second car of the train that receives the communication signal and transmits a receiving signal back to the interrogator;

a location determination unit coupled to the interrogator, the location determination unit is configured to calculate an actual line of sight distance based on the receiving signal, and calculate an expected line of sight distance based on the location of the train on a mapped train track;

wherein the system determines the integrity of the train by comparing the actual line of sight distance with the expected line of sight distance.

2. The system of claim 1, further comprising a track database coupled to the location determination unit, the track database storing track parameter data of the mapped track including track offset data, location data, grade data, heading data and curvature data at a plurality of track point elements on the mapped train track.

3. The system of claim 1, wherein the interrogator is a radio frequency interrogator that transmits a radio frequency communication signal and the transponder is a radio frequency transponder that transmits a radio frequency receiving signal.

4. The system of claim 1, wherein the location determination unit is a rail guide sensor.

5. The system of claim 1, wherein the system determines the integrity of the train by comparing the actual line of sight distance with the expected line of sight distance at least every thirty seconds while the train is in operation.

6. The system of claim 1, wherein the location determination unit is configured to calculate track parameter data of the mapped track including track offset data, location data, grade data, heading data and curvature data at a plurality of track point elements on the mapped train track.

7. The system of claim 1, wherein the location determination unit is configured to determine the integrity of the train by comparing the actual line of sight distance with the expected line of sight distance.

8. The system of claim 1, further comprising a remote station that is configured to compare the actual line of sight distance with the expected line of sight distance to determine the integrity of the train.

9. The system of claim 1, wherein the system is configured to determine that the integrity of the train is maintained when a difference between the actual line of sight distance and the expected line of sight distance is less than or equal to a tolerance threshold value.

10. A method for determining the integrity of a train in real-time, the method comprising:

transmitting, via an interrogator disposed on a first car of the train, a communication signal to a transponder disposed on a second car of the train;

upon receiving the communication signal, the transponder transmitting a receiving signal to the interrogator;

the transponder receiving the receiving signal and determining an actual line of sight distance between the first car and the second car;

calculating, via a location determination unit coupled to the interrogator, an expected line of sight distance between the first car and the second car that is determined based on the location of the train on a mapped train track;

comparing the actual line of sight distance to the expected line of sight distance to determine whether the integrity of the train is maintained.

11. The method of claim 10, further comprising determining that the integrity of the train is maintained when a difference between the actual line of sight distance and the expected line of sight distance is less than or equal to a tolerance threshold value.

12. The method of claim 10, wherein determining the actual line of sight distance includes computing the time period between the interrogator sending the communication signal and the interrogator receiving the receiving signal.

13. The method of claim 10, wherein determining the expected line of sight distance includes:

determining an actual real-time position of the first car on the mapped train track;

calculating a derived real-time position of the second car using track parameter data of the mapped train track;

calculating the expected line of sight distance based on the actual real-time position of the first car and the derived real-time position of the second car.

14. The method of claim 13, wherein the track parameter data includes track offset data, location data, grade data, heading data and curvature data at a plurality of track point elements on the mapped train track.

15. The method of claim 13, further comprising the location determination unit calculating track parameter data of the mapped track including track offset data, location data, grade data, heading data and curvature data at a plurality of track point elements on the mapped train track.

16. The method of claim 10, wherein the interrogator is a radio frequency interrogator, the transponder is a radio frequency transponder, the communication signal is a radio frequency communication signal and the receiving signal is a radio frequency communication signal.

17. The method of claim 10, wherein comparing the actual line of sight distance to the expected line of sight distance is performed at least every thirty seconds while the train is in operation.