Remote monitoring systems and methods

• US 8,688,405 B2
• Filed: 06/16/2008
• Issued: 04/01/2014
• Est. Priority Date: 06/15/2007
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Shell USA Incorporated (Shell Plc)
• Original Assignee: Shell Oil Company (Shell Plc)
• Inventors: Cottrell, Michael Edward, Dang, Chester Bing, Gul, Rong Pieter, Hardeveld, Wilhelmus Antonius, Harnish, Brett Richard Alexander, Innes, Kenneth John, Kong, James Po, Van Latum, Mark Theodoor, Lee, Kwi-Cheng, Lickteig, Charles Anthony, Parchewsky, Robert Frank, Polley, Matthew Charles, Ravesloot, Wilhelmus, Schultheis, Steven Michael, Ying, Daniel Dazhang, Zolkiewski, George Mark
• Primary Examiner(s): COSIMANO, EDWARD R
• Application Number:
  US12/664,090
• Publication Number:
  US 20120016607A1
• Time in Patent Office: 2,115 Days
• Field of Search: 731/120.1, 731/120.3, 731/130.1, 734/321, 738/658, 738/659, 340/500, 340/540, 340/679, 340/680, 340/870.01, 340/870.07, 340/870.16, 700/1, 700/9, 700/28, 700/32, 700/33, 700/90, 700/95, 700/108, 702/1, 702/33, 702/34, 702/127, 702/182, 702/183, 702/186, 702/187, 702/188, 702/189, 708/100, 708/200
• US Class Current: 702/188
• CPC Class Codes: G05B 23/0229 knowledge based, e.g. expert systems; genetic algorithms
• CPC Class Codes: G06K 7/10009 sensing by radiation using wavelengths larger than 0.1 mm, e.g. radio-waves or microwaves

Abstract

A system for monitoring an industrial process, comprising one or more sensors connected to one or more operating components of the industrial process; a remote monitoring station, comprising a computer and a database; and a connection between the one or more sensors and the remote monitoring station, wherein the remote monitoring station is at least about 100-2500 miles away from the industrial process, for example 500-1000 miles.

Claims

1. A method of monitoring an industrial site, comprising:

receiving operational data from a plurality of trains at the industrial site, wherein the plurality of trains comprise a first train and a second train, and wherein the first train and the second train are in a first service class;

determining, based on the operational data, that an output of a component of the first train is below a minimum operating threshold of the component;

setting a run status of the first train, based on the determination that the output is below the minimum operating threshold;

determining, based on the operational data, that a first aggregate output of all trains in the first service class is greater than a first required output;

setting a first class status for all trains in the first service class, based on the determination that the first aggregate output is greater than the first required output; and

displaying the run status and the first class status on a user interface.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

determining, based on the operational data, that a second aggregate output of all trains in a second service class is less than a second required output;

setting a second class status for all trains in the second service class, based on the determination that the second aggregate output is less than the second required output,

wherein the user interface is updated to include the second class status for all trains in the second service class.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the displaying step displays the run status and the first class status as stop light indicators.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the first service class is one selected from a group consisting of power generation, air compression, circulation pumping, gas compression, and condensate loading.

5. The method of claim 1, further comprising, after displaying the run status and the first class status:

determining that the component is failing; and

taking corrective action to repair the component.

6. The method of claim 1, further comprising, prior to the receiving:

identifying the plurality of trains at the industrial site in the first service class; and

setting an aggregate train value for all trains in the first service class, wherein the aggregate train value is expressed as a percentage of the required output for all trains in the first class.

7. The method of claim 6, further comprising, prior to the receiving:

identifying a plurality of components in the first train, wherein the component is one of the plurality of components;

mapping each component in the plurality of components to at least one sensor; and

setting a minimum operating threshold for each component in the plurality of components.

8. The method of claim 6, wherein the aggregate train value is greater than 100% of the required output.

9. The method of claim 6, wherein the aggregate train value is less than 100% of the required output.