System and method for hand-offs in cloud environments

• US 8,688,768 B2
• Filed: 11/18/2011
• Issued: 04/01/2014
• Est. Priority Date: 11/18/2011
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: CA, Inc. (d/b/a CA Technologies) (Broadcom, Inc.)
• Original Assignee: CA, Inc. (d/b/a CA Technologies) (Broadcom, Inc.)
• Inventors: Diwakar, Kiran Prakash
• Primary Examiner(s): WANG, LIANG CHE A
• Application Number:
  US13/299,938
• Publication Number:
  US 20130132457A1
• Time in Patent Office: 865 Days
• Field of Search: 709/201, 709/202, 709/204, 709/217, 709/223
• US Class Current: 709/201
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 9/5072 Grid computing
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 67/10 in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network software deployment G06F8/60; multiprogramming arrangements G06F9/46

Abstract

A system, method, and computer-readable storage medium for handling hand-offs in a cloud computing environment is provided. The method includes identifying, at a cloud governance module of a server device, a plurality of applications executing on a plurality of servers belonging to a plurality of cloud computing service providers. The method includes determining based upon information in a policy module, to hand-off an execution of at least one identified application executing on a first cloud computing service provider platform to a second cloud computing service provider, determining whether the second cloud computing service provider satisfies one or more governance policies associated with the at least one identified application, and handing-off the execution of the at least one identified application to a second cloud computing provider platform based upon the second cloud computing provider being compliant with the one or more governance policies associated with the at least one identified application.

Claims

1. A method to handle a hand-off in a cloud computing environment, the method comprising:

identifying, at a cloud governance module of a server device, a plurality of applications executing on a plurality of servers belonging to a plurality of cloud computing service providers;

determining, at the cloud governance module, based upon information in a policy module, to hand-off an execution of at least one identified application executing on a first cloud computing service provider platform to a second cloud computing service provider;

determining, at the cloud governance module, whether the second cloud computing service provider satisfies a governance policy associated with the at least one identified application; and

handing-off, using the cloud governance module, the execution of the at least one identified application to a second cloud computing provider platform based upon the second cloud computing provider being compliant with the governance policy associated with the at least one identified application, wherein the handing-off comprises transferring a current state associated with the execution of the at least one identified application to the second cloud computing service platform.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the governance policy comprises a policy associated with one or more selected from:

network security, a network protocol, application support, network hardware support, user authentication, an operating system requirement, audit compliance, user and cloud computing provider profile management, type of application supported by the first and the second cloud computing service providers, a storage parameter, and/or network operability.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the governance policy is stored in an Extensible Markup Language (XML) file format in the cloud governance module.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the determining to hand-off the execution comprises at least one selected from:

receiving, at the cloud governance module, a first notification from the first cloud computing service provider of an inability to support executing the at least one identified application at a future instance of time;

receiving, at the cloud governance module, a second notification from a system administrator regarding an availability of a better application support capability and/or cost effectiveness of the second cloud computing service provider; and

/or

receiving, at the cloud governance module, a third notification from a security device regarding a security breach detected at the first cloud computing service provider.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the handing-off occurs without a disruption in the execution of the at least one identified application.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the determining whether the second cloud computing provider satisfies the governance policy associated with the at least one identified application further comprises:

determining an existence of the governance policy at the cloud governance module;

updating the existing governance policy at the cloud governance module; and

creating a new governance policy responsive to the governance policy being determined to be non-existent.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the determining whether the second cloud computing provider satisfies the governance policy associated with the at least one identified application comprises searching for a resource for use by the at least one identified application.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the handing-off is carried out in real-time such that the current state of the execution of the at least one identified application is used by the second cloud computing service provider platform to continue the execution of the at least one identified application after the handing-off is completed.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein responsive to the at least one identified application being detected to be dormant, the handing-off is carried out using a set of parameters associated with the at least one identified application.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein the second cloud computing service provider is determined by the cloud governance module to be selected based upon satisfying optimum performance metric conditions required for the execution of the at least one identified application.

11. A non-transitory tangible computer-readable storage medium having one or more computer-readable instructions thereon to handle a hand-off in a cloud computing environment, which when executed by a processor cause the processor to:

identify, at a cloud governance module of a server device, a plurality of applications executing on a plurality of servers belonging to a plurality of cloud computing service providers;

determine, at the cloud governance module, based upon information in a policy module, to hand-off an execution of at least one identified application executing on a first cloud computing service provider platform to a second cloud computing service provider;

determine, at the cloud governance module, whether the second cloud computing service provider satisfies a governance policy associated with the at least one identified application; and

hand-off, using the cloud governance module, the execution of the at least one identified application to a second cloud computing provider platform based upon the second cloud computing provider being compliant with the governance policy associated with the at least one identified application, wherein the hand-off comprises a transfer of a current state associated with the execution of the at least one identified application to the second cloud computing service platform.

12. The tangible computer-readable storage medium of claim 11, wherein the governance policy comprises a policy associated with one or more selected from:

network security, a network protocol, application support, network hardware support, user authentication, an operating system requirement, audit compliance, user and cloud computing provider profile management, type of application supported by the first and the second cloud computing service providers, a storage parameter, and/or network operability.

13. The tangible computer-readable storage medium of claim 11, wherein the governance policy is stored in an Extensible Markup Language (XML) file format in the cloud governance module.

14. The tangible computer-readable storage medium of claim 11, wherein the one or more instructions further cause the processor to perform at least one selected from:

receiving, at the cloud governance module, a first notification from the first cloud computing service provider of an inability to support executing the at least one identified application at a future instance of time;

receiving, at the cloud governance module, a second notification from a system administrator regarding an availability of a better application support capability and/or cost effectiveness of the second cloud computing service provider; and

/or

receiving, at the cloud governance module, a third notification from a security device regarding a security breach detected at the first cloud computing service provider.

15. The tangible computer-readable storage medium of claim 11, wherein the hand-off occurs without a disruption in the execution of the at least one identified application.

16. The tangible computer-readable storage medium of claim 11, wherein the one or more instructions further cause the processor to:

determine an existence of the governance policy at the cloud governance module;

update the existing governance policy at the cloud governance module; and

create a new governance policy responsive to the governance policy being determined to be non-existent.

17. The tangible computer-readable storage medium of claim 11, wherein the one or more instructions further cause the processor to search for a resource for use by the at least one identified application.

18. The tangible computer-readable storage medium of claim 11, wherein the hand-off is carried out in real-time such that the current state of the execution of the at least one identified application is used by the second cloud computing service provider platform to continue the execution of the at least one identified application after the hand-off is completed.

19. The tangible computer-readable storage medium of claim 11, wherein responsive to the at least one identified application being detected to be dormant, the hand-off is carried out using a set of parameters associated with the at least one identified application.

20. The tangible computer-readable storage medium of claim 11, wherein the second cloud computing service provider is determined by the cloud governance module to be selected based upon satisfying optimum performance metric conditions required for the execution of the at least one identified application.

21. A system to handle a hand-off in a cloud computing environment, the system comprising:

a processor configured to;

identify, at a cloud governance module of a server device, a plurality of applications executing on a plurality of servers belonging to a plurality of cloud computing service providers;

determine, at the cloud governance module, based upon information in a policy module, to hand-off an execution of at least one identified application executing on a first cloud computing service provider platform to a second cloud computing service provider;

determine, at the cloud governance module, whether the second cloud computing service provider satisfies a governance policy associated with the at least one identified application; and

hand-off, using the cloud governance module, the execution of the at least one identified application to a second cloud computing provider platform based upon the second cloud computing provider being compliant with the governance policy associated with the at least one identified application, wherein the hand-off comprises a transfer of a current state associated with the execution of the at least one identified application to the second cloud computing service platform.

22. The system of claim 21, wherein the governance policy comprises a policy associated with one or more selected from:

network security, a network protocol, application support, network hardware support, user authentication, an operating system requirement, audit compliance, user and cloud computing provider profile management, type of application supported by the first and the second cloud computing service providers, a storage parameter, and/or network operability.

23. The system of claim 21, wherein the governance policy is stored in an Extensible Markup Language (XML) file format in the cloud governance module.

24. The system of claim 21, wherein the processor is further configured to perform at least one selected from:

receiving, at the cloud governance module, a first notification from the first cloud computing service provider of an inability to support executing the at least one identified application at a future instance of time;

receiving, at the cloud governance module, a second notification from a system administrator regarding an availability of a better application support capability and/or cost effectiveness of the second cloud computing service provider; and

/or

receiving, at the cloud governance module, a third notification from a security device regarding a security breach detected at the first cloud computing service provider.

25. The system of claim 21, wherein the hand-off occurs without a disruption in the execution of the at least one identified application.

26. The system of claim 21, wherein the processor is further configured to:

determine an existence of the governance policy at the cloud governance module;

update the existing governance policy at the cloud governance module; and

create a new governance policy responsive to the governance policy being determined to be non-existent.

27. The system of claim 21, wherein the processor is further configured to search for a resource for use by the at least one identified application.

28. The system of claim 21, wherein the hand-off is carried out in real-time such that the current state of the execution of the at least one identified application is used by the second cloud computing service provider platform to continue the execution of the at least one identified application after the hand-off is completed.

29. The system of claim 21, wherein responsive to the at least one identified application being detected to be dormant, the hand-off is carried out using a set of parameters associated with the at least one identified application.

30. The system of claim 21, wherein the second cloud computing service provider is determined by the cloud governance module to be selected based upon satisfying optimum performance metric conditions required for the execution of the at least one identified application.