System and method for utilizing excess printing capability

• US 8,705,054 B2
• Filed: 08/23/2010
• Issued: 04/22/2014
• Est. Priority Date: 03/01/2002
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: PrintingForLess.com Incorporated (PFL Tech, Inc.)
• Original Assignee: PrintingForLess.com Incorporated (PFL Tech, Inc.)
• Inventors: Field, Andrew S.
• Primary Examiner(s): DICKERSON, CHAD S
• Application Number:
  US12/861,447
• Publication Number:
  US 20110040597A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,338 Days
• Field of Search: 358 111- 118, 358/400, 358/506, 358/487, 358/407, 358/404, 358/468, 358/1.9, 358/448, 358/451, 358/452, 399/82, 399/84, 101/494, 709219-229, 705/400, 705/7, 705/14, 705/26
• US Class Current: 358/1.13
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/063116 Schedule adjustment for a person or group
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0283 Price estimation or determination
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/06 Buying, selling or leasing transactions
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 50/188 Electronic negotiation

Abstract

The present invention is a system and method for utilizing excess printing capacity. The present invention utilizes a printing network that consists of a printing service provider, one or more print jobs, a printing distribution system, and printing partners. The printing service provider uses a printing distribution system to distribute standardized print jobs to printing partners at a fixed price.

Claims

1. A computer-implemented method for utilizing excess production capacity in an industry, the method comprising:

aggregating one or more orders from customers;

establishing, by a fulfillment service provider, a network of one or more fulfillment partners within the industry, wherein the one or more fulfillment partners do not submit pricing, bidding, and cost information to the fulfillment service provider and the customers;

using computer-executable instructions to create a production job from the one or more orders by a fulfillment service provider processing the one or more orders into a standard format that is understandable and useable by the fulfillment partner within the industry;

receiving by the fulfillment service provider one or more production jobs created from the one or more orders submitted by the customers;

establishing by the fulfillment service provider a non-negotiable, pre-set price that is a percentage of a customer-quoted price;

determining by the fulfillment service provider whether to direct each production job to an in-house production capacity operated by the fulfillment service provider, or to make the order available to one or more fulfillment partners;

determining, by the fulfillment service provider, if the fulfillment service provider or a fulfillment partner handled one or more past production jobs associated with the customer;

making available by the fulfillment service provider a current production job to a fulfillment partner that has performed a past production job for the customer with the current production job, wherein the fulfillment partner is alerted to the availability of the current production job by email, internet, telephone, or pager;

sending the current production job through a distribution system of the fulfillment service provider, if the fulfillment partner identified as having completed past production jobs for the current customer does not select the current production job; and

allowing each of the fulfillment partners an ability to select and complete one or more of the production jobs at the negotiated, pre-set price, and the first fulfillment partner that selects the production job outputs and delivers the production job to the customer.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein each of the one or more orders includes customer specifications.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the method further includes rating each fulfillment partner based on one or more pre-established performance parameters and using the rating as one of the pre-established criteria.

4. The method of claim 2, wherein the method further includes rating each fulfillment partner based on one or more pre-established performance parameters including overall print quality, color balance, registration, success rate in processing print files, and on-time shipment performance, and using the rating as one of the pre-established criteria.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the pre-established criteria includes geography and product attributes.