Centralized behavioral information system

• US 8,713,175 B2
• Filed: 09/14/2012
• Issued: 04/29/2014
• Est. Priority Date: 04/04/2005
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Meta Platforms, Inc. (f/k/a Facebook, Inc.)
• Original Assignee: Meta Platforms, Inc. (f/k/a Facebook, Inc.)
• Inventors: Logue, Jay D., Landsman, Richard A., Sullivan, Timoth T., Goldman, Phillip Y.
• Primary Examiner(s): DONAGHUE, LARRY D
• Application Number:
  US13/620,674
• Publication Number:
  US 20130080552A1
• Time in Patent Office: 592 Days
• Field of Search: 709/206, 709/225, 709/229
• US Class Current: 709/224
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/107 Computer-aided management of electronic mailing [e-mailing]
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 51/212 using filtering or selective blocking

Abstract

Systems and methods for reducing the number of challenge messages that are sent in response to an incoming message in situations where the incoming message is likely not unsolicited. The systems and methods include evaluating the behavior of a sender with regard to one or more federated messaging services and determining if the sender is approved or unapproved. If the sender is approved, the incoming message is deliver to a recipient'"'"'s inbox without issuing a challenge message. Unapproved senders are required to respond to a challenge message.

Claims

1. A method comprising:

identifying a first sender associated with an incoming message;

maintaining behavioral information about the first sender on a database associated with the first server;

receiving behavioral information for the first sender from a second server;

compiling the behavioral information on the database and the behavioral information from the second server;

applying predetermined criteria to the compiled behavioral information to determine if the first sender is approved or unapproved;

sending the incoming message directly to a recipient'"'"'s inbox if the sender is determined to be approved; and

sending a challenge message to the sender if the sender is determined to be unapproved.

2. A method comprising:

receiving, from a first federated messaging service, behavioral information associated with a plurality of senders;

receiving, from a second federated messaging service, behavioral information associated with the plurality of senders;

compiling the behavioral information received from the first federated messaging service and the behavioral information received from the second federated messaging service;

maintaining, in a central database, the compiled behavioral information; and

determining, based on the compiled behavioral information, whether to send a challenge message to at least one of the plurality of senders.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the behavioral information received from the first federated messaging service comprises a different type of information than the behavioral information received from the second federated messaging service.

4. The method of claim 2, further comprising generating a score for each sender from the plurality of senders based on the behavioral information received from the first federated messaging service and the behavioral information received form the second federated messaging service.

5. The method of claim 4, further comprising determining, based on the generated score, an approval status for a particular sender from the plurality of senders.

6. The method of claim 2, further comprising authenticating the behavior information received from the first federated messaging service and the behavioral information received from the second federated messaging service.

7. The method of claim 2, wherein receiving behavioral information from the first federated messaging service and receiving behavioral information from the second federated messaging service further comprises receiving the behavioral information from the first federated messaging service and the behavioral information from the second federated messaging service in real-time based on the real-time behavior of the plurality of senders.

8. The method of claim 2, wherein the behavioral information received from the first federated messaging service and the behavioral information received from the second federated messaging service comprises at least one of a total number of electronic messages sent by a sender;

a total time spent by the sender to generate each of the electronic messages; and

a time of day the sender sends the electronic messages.

9. The method of claim 2, wherein the behavioral information received from the first federated messaging service comprises an indicator of whether a particular sender from the plurality of senders has an approved status with the first federated messaging service.

10. The method of claim 2, wherein the behavioral information received from the second federated messaging service comprises an indicator of whether a particular sender from the plurality of senders has an approved status with the second federated messaging service.

11. A method, comprising:

receiving, from a first federated messaging service, behavioral information associated with a plurality of senders;

receiving, from a second federated messaging service, behavioral information associated with the plurality of senders;

receiving, from a third federated messaging service, a request for behavioral information associated with a particular sender from the plurality of senders; and

sending a response to the third federated messaging service, wherein;

the response is based on the behavioral information received from the first federated messaging service and the behavioral information received from the second federated messaging service; and

the response is used to determine whether a challenge message is sent to the particular sender.

12. The method of claim 11, further comprising determining, based on the behavioral information received from the first federated messaging service and the behavioral information received from the second federated messaging service, an approval status of the particular sender.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein sending the response to the third federated messaging service comprises sending the approval status to the third federated messaging service.

14. The method of claim 11, further comprising:

receiving, from the first federated messaging service, updated behavioral information associated with the plurality of senders; and

receiving, from the second federated messaging service, updated behavioral information associated with the plurality of senders.

15. The method of claim 11, further comprising analyzing the behavioral information received from the first federated messaging service and the behavioral information received from the second federated messaging service for characteristics that indicate the particular sender is a real person.

16. The method of claim 11, further comprising:

generating a score for the particular sender based on the behavioral information received from the first federated messaging service and the behavioral information received form the second federated messaging service;

comparing the generated score to a threshold value associated with the third federated messaging service; and

determining an approval status of the particular sender based on the comparison of the generated score to the threshold value.

17. A system comprising:

at least one processor; and

at least one non-transitory computer readable storage medium storing instructions thereon that, when executed by the at least on processor, cause the system to;

receive, from a first federated messaging service, behavioral information associated with a plurality of senders;

receive, from a second federated messaging service, behavioral information associated with the plurality of senders;

receive, from a third federated messaging service, a request for behavioral information associated with a particular sender from the plurality of senders; and

send a response to the third federated messaging service, wherein;

the response is based on the behavioral information received from the first federated messaging service and the behavioral information received from the second federated messaging service; and

the response is used to determine whether a challenge message is sent to the particular sender.

18. The system of claim 17, further comprising instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the system to determine, based on the behavioral information received from the first federated messaging service and the behavioral information received from the second federated messaging service, an approval status of the particular sender.

19. The system of claim 18, wherein the behavioral information received from the first federated messaging service contains different types of information than the behavioral information received from the second federated messaging service.

20. The system of claim 19 wherein the behavioral information received from at least one of the first federated messaging service or the second federated messaging service comprises a number of messages sent by each sender from the plurality of senders, and a time when each of the messages was sent.

21. The system of claim 20, further comprising instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the system to compare a first number of messages sent from each of the plurality of users during a first time period to a second number of messages sent from each of the plurality of users during a second time period.