Shock load mitigation in a downhole perforation tool assembly

• US 8,714,252 B2
• Filed: 05/15/2013
• Issued: 05/06/2014
• Est. Priority Date: 04/29/2011
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Halliburton Energy Services Incorporated (Halliburton Company)
• Original Assignee: Halliburton Energy Services Incorporated (Halliburton Company)
• Inventors: Burleson, John D, Serra, Marco, Hales, John H, Glenn, Timothy S, Rodgers, John P, Nelson, Jeff A
• Primary Examiner(s): Ro, Yong-Suk (Philip)
• Application Number:
  US13/895,032
• Publication Number:
  US 20130248184A1
• Time in Patent Office: 356 Days
• Field of Search: 166/378, 166/55, 166/797, 166297-299, 175/4.5, 285/141, 285/222, 285/331
• US Class Current: 166/297
• CPC Class Codes: E21B 17/07 Telescoping joints for varying drill string lengths; Shock absorbers
• CPC Class Codes: E21B 43/11 Perforators; Permeators
• CPC Class Codes: E21B 43/117 Shaped-charge perforators E21B43/118 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 30/17 Mechanical parametric or variational design

Abstract

A perforation tool assembly comprises an energy train, a first perforation gun, and a second perforation gun. The energy train comprises a moderator to reduce the speed of propagation of a detonation in a direction parallel to the axis of the perforation tool assembly. The first perforation gun comprises a plurality of explosive charges coupled to a first portion of the energy train. The second perforation gun comprises a plurality of explosive charges coupled to a second portion of the energy train, wherein the second portion of the energy train is coupled to the first portion of the energy train.

Claims

1. A method of perforating a wellbore, comprising:

calculating a speed of propagation of a shock wave through a tool body of a perforation tool assembly, wherein the perforation tool assembly comprises a plurality of explosive charges;

calculating a speed of detonation propagation in an energy train in a direction parallel to an axis of the tool body of the perforation tool assembly;

designing the perforation tool assembly, based on calculating the speed of propagation of the shock wave and calculating the speed of detonation propagation, to mitigate a shock load associated with an interaction between detonation of the plurality of explosive charges;

building the perforation tool assembly based on designing the perforation tool assembly; and

perforating a wellbore by firing the perforation tool assembly.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the perforation tool assembly comprises one or more structures that alter the propagation of the shock wave through the tool body of the perforation tool assembly.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the one or more structures that alter the propagation of the shock wave are selected from the group consisting of a mass energy absorber, a deformable energy absorber, a hydraulic shock absorber, a spacer providing an acoustic impedance mismatch, and a decoupler.

4. The method of claim 2, wherein the one or more structures that alter the propagation of the shock wave comprise a spacer having a tool body composed of a composite material.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein designing the perforation tool assembly to mitigate the shock load associated with the interaction between detonation of the plurality of explosive charges comprises designing the perforation tool assembly to offset the speed of propagation of the shock wave through the tool body of the perforation tool assembly and the speed of detonation propagation in the energy train in the direction parallel to the axis of the tool body of the perforation tool assembly.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein calculating the speed of propagation of the shock wave is based on analyzing properties of the tool body of the perforation tool assembly in the context of a downhole environment.

7. The method of claim 5, wherein the perforation tool assembly is designed to offset the speed of propagation of the shock wave relative to the speed of detonation propagation by at least 5%.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the perforation tool assembly comprises structures that alter the speed of detonation propagation in the energy train in the direction parallel to the axis of the tool body of the perforation tool assembly relative to a speed of detonation propagation in an energy train in a direction parallel to an axis of a tool body of a conventional perforation tool assembly.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein the structures are selected from the group consisting of a spacer incorporating an indirect path into an energy train segment of the spacer, a spacer incorporating a reduced speed detonation cord into an energy train segment of the spacer, a spacer incorporating a bullet firing gun as a portion of an energy train segment of the spacer, and a perforation gun incorporating a reduced speed detonation cord into an energy train segment of the perforation gun.

10. The method of claim 8, wherein at least one of the structures delays the detonation propagation of the energy train through an energy train segment of the structure.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein designing the perforating tool assembly to mitigate the shock load is based on a number of explosive charges of the plurality of explosive charges that are detonated.

12. The method of claim 1, wherein designing the perforating tool assembly to mitigate the shock load is based on at least one of the elasticity of the tool body, an extent to which energy in the shock wave is dissipated in the tool body, or an extent to which the energy in the shock wave decays in the tool body.

13. The method of claim 1, wherein the perforating tools of the perforating tool assembly are fired in a top to bottom sequence.

14. The method of claim 1, wherein designing the perforating tool to mitigate the shock load comprises increasing the speed of the detonation propagation by using an electrical signal as the energy train.

15. The method of claim 1, wherein the perforating tools of the perforating tool assembly are fired substantially concurrently.

16. A method of perforating a wellbore, comprising:

calculating a speed of propagation of a shock wave through a plurality of completed perforation tool assemblies during a corresponding plurality of perforating events;

calculating a speed of detonation propagation in an energy train in a direction parallel to an axis of a tool body of one or more of the plurality of completed perforation tool assemblies; and

designing a new perforation tool assembly to mitigate a shock load associated with an interaction between detonation of a plurality of explosive charges in the new perforation tool based on calculating the speed of propagation of the shock wave and calculating the speed of detonation propagation;

building the new perforation tool assembly based on the perforation tool assembly design; and

perforating a wellbore by firing the new perforation tool assembly.

17. The method of claim 16, further comprising:

measuring a speed of propagation of a shock wave through an other completed perforation tool assembly during a corresponding perforating event;

measuring a speed of detonation propagation in an energy train in a direction parallel to an axis of a tool body of the other completed perforation tool assembly; and

redesigning the new perforation tool assembly to mitigate the shock load associated with the interaction between detonation of the plurality of explosive charges in the new perforation tool based on;

the calculating the speed of propagation of the shock wave of the plurality of completed perforation tool assemblies, the calculating the speed of detonation propagation of the one or more of the plurality of completed perforation tool assemblies, the measuring the speed of propagation of the shock wave of the other completed perforation tool assembly, and the measuring the speed of detonation propagation of the other completed perforation tool assembly.

18. The method of claim 16, wherein designing the new perforation tool assembly comprises designing the new perforation tool assembly to offset the speed of shock wave propagation through the tool body of the new perforation tool assembly.

19. The method of claim 16, wherein designing the new perforation tool assembly comprises designing the new perforation tool assembly to offset the speed of detonation propagation in the direction parallel to the axis of the tool body of the new perforation tool assembly.