Method and system for determining software license compliance

• US 8,725,647 B2
• Filed: 03/27/2008
• Issued: 05/13/2014
• Est. Priority Date: 03/27/2008
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: CA, Inc. (d/b/a CA Technologies) (Broadcom, Inc.)
• Original Assignee: CA, Inc. (d/b/a CA Technologies) (Broadcom, Inc.)
• Inventors: Disciascio, David, Bash, Lee B., Caley, Erika M., Wu, Nan
• Primary Examiner(s): Augustin, Evens J
• Application Number:
  US12/057,053
• Publication Number:
  US 20090249494A1
• Time in Patent Office: 2,238 Days
• Field of Search: 707/100, 705/59
• US Class Current: 705/59
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 21/10 Protecting distributed programs or content, e.g. vending or licensing of copyrighted material protection in video systems or pay television H04N7/16 ; Digital rights management [DRM]

Abstract

According to one embodiment, a method includes providing one or more selectable criteria that each characterize a respective software license restriction. One or more selections of the one or more selectable criteria are received. A license metric is generated. The license metric corresponds to one or more selections of the one or more selectable criteria. A total number of instances of one or more software products is determined using the generated license metric.

Claims

1. A method, comprising:

providing, by a server, one or more selectable criteria, to a licensee, wherein the one or more selectable criteria each characterize a respective software license restriction of an executed software license governing the use of a software product by a plurality of client devices associated with the licensee;

receiving, by the server, one or more selections of the one or more selectable criteria from the licensee;

generating, by the server, a license metric corresponding to the one or more selections of the one or more selectable criteria by the licensee, the license metric identifying a number of instances that the software product may be used by the plurality of client devices associated with the licensee, wherein the number of instances that the software product may be used is governed by a plurality of overlapping licenses executed by the licensee;

determining, by the server and based on the generated license metric, a count of a total number of instances of use of the software product by the plurality of client devices associated with the licensee; and

determining, by the server, if the licensee is in compliance with the plurality of licenses based on a comparison of the total number of instances of use of the software product to the number of instances that the software may be used as governed by the plurality of overlapping licenses executed by the licensee.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the generated license metric measures the determined total number of instances of the software product based at least partially on a definition selected from the group consisting of:

a single install that considers each instance of the total number of instances according to a single installation of the software product on a respective client;

a multiple install that considers each instance of the total number of instances according to at least first and second installations on respective clients of the software product;

a fixed number of installs that considers each instance of the total number of instances according to installations of the software product independent of whether one or more of the total number of instances are installed on the same client; and

an unlimited install that specifies an unlimited number of instances.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the one or more selectable criteria are hierarchically organized.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein first and second selectable criteria of the one or more selectable criteria characterize the respective software license restriction as installation-based and usage-based, respectively.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the one or more selectable criteria are provided in the form of one or more categories selected from the group consisting of:

quantity criteria that control the total number of instances in terms of number;

entity criteria that control the total number of instances in terms of user, location, enterprise, or organization within an enterprise; and

hardware criteria that control the total number of instances in terms of hardware characteristics.

6. The method of claim 1, further comprising generating a description that summarizes each of the one or more selections of the one or more selectable criteria.

13. The method of claim 1, wherein:

the steps of generating a license metric and determining compliance of the plurality of overlapping licenses are performed in response to a triggering event,

the triggering event comprises adding a new software product to be governed by the plurality of overlapping licenses executed by the licensee, and

the method further includes associating the new software product with the plurality of overlapping licenses executed by the licensee.

14. The method of claim 1, wherein:

the steps of generating the license metric and determining compliance of the plurality of overlapping licenses are performed in response to a triggering event, and

the triggering event comprises disassociating a software product from the plurality of overlapping licensees, the software product no longer governed by the plurality of overlapping licenses executed by the licensee.

15. The method of claim 1, wherein determining if the licensee is in compliance with the plurality of overlapping licenses comprises:

calculating a summation of the number of instances that the software product may be used according to a first executed license and the number of instances that the software product may be used according to a second executed license;

determining that the licensee is in compliance with first and second executed licenses if the total number of instances of use is less than or equal to the summation of the number of instances that the software product may be used according to the first executed license and the number of instances that the software product may be used according to the second executed license; and

determining that the licensee is not in compliance with first and second executed licenses if the total number of instances of use is more than the summation of the number of instances that the software product may be used according to the first executed license and the number of instances that the software product may he used according to the second executed license.

16. The method of claim 1, wherein determining if the licensee is in compliance with the plurality of overlapping licenses comprises:

generating a matrix comprising a plurality of rows and a plurality of columns, wherein each row contains data associated with a selected one of the plurality of executed and overlapping licenses and each column contains represents a respective one of a plurality of software products;

for each column of the matrix, calculating a number of instances that each of the plurality of software products are used by the plurality of client systems associated with the licensee; and

for each of row of the matrix, calculating a total number of instances that the plurality of software products may be used for each of the plurality of executed and overlapping licenses.

17. The method of claim 1, wherein:

presenting one or more selectable criteria comprises presenting a wizard type graphical user interface to the user, the wizard type graphical user interface displaying one or more fill in the blank statements to the user; and

the method further comprises forming a sentence based on the one or more selections of the one or more selectable criteria received from the user, the sentence summarizing the respective software license restriction.

18. The method of claim 1, wherein the one or more selectable criteria comprises a restriction limiting installation of the software product to a set list of a plurality of hardware devices.

19. The method of claim 1, wherein the one or more selectable criteria comprises a restriction limiting use of the software product to a set list of a plurality of users.

26. The non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 1, wherein the one or more selectable criteria comprises a restriction limiting use of the software product to a set list of a plurality of users.

7. A non-transitory computer-readable media with instructions being executed by a computer to:

present one or more selectable criteria, to a licensee, wherein the one or more selectable criteria each characterize a respective software license restriction of an executed software license governing the use of a software product by a plurality of client systems associated with the licensee;

receive one or more selections of the one or more selectable criteria from the licensee;

generate a license metric corresponding to the one or more selections of the one or more selectable criteria by the licensee, the license metric identifying a number of instances that the software product may be used by the plurality of client systems associated with the licensee, wherein the number of instances that the software product may be used is governed by a plurality of overlapping licenses executed by the licensee;

determine, based on the generated license metric, a count of a total number of instances of use of the software product by the plurality of client systems associated with the licensee; and

determine if the licensee is in compliance with the plurality of licenses based on a comparison of the total number of instances of use of the software product to the number of instances that the software may be used as governed by the plurality of overlapping licenses executed by the licensee.

8. The non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 7, wherein the generated license metric measures the determined total number of instances of the software product based at least partially on a definition selected from the group consisting of:

a single install that considers each instance of the total number of instances according to a single installation of the software product on a respective client;

a multiple install that considers each instance of the total number of instances according to at least first and second installations on respective clients of the software product;

a fixed number of installs that considers each instance of the total number of instances according to installations of the software product independent of whether one or more of the total number of instances are installed on the same client; and

an unlimited install that specifies an unlimited number of instances.

9. The non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 7, wherein the one or more selectable criteria are hierarchically organized.

10. The non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 7, wherein first and second selectable criteria of the one or more selectable criteria characterize the respective software license restriction as installation-based and usage-based, respectively.

11. The non-transitory computer-readable media claim 7, wherein the one or more selectable criteria are provided in the form of one or more categories selected from the group consisting of:

quantity criteria that control the total number of instances in terms of number;

entity criteria that control the total number of instances in terms of user, location, enterprise, or organization within an enterprise; and

hardware criteria that control the total number of instances in terms of hardware characteristics.

12. The non-transitory computer-readable media claim 7, wherein the logic is further operable to generate a description that summarizes each of the one or more selections of the one or more selectable criteria.

20. The non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 7, wherein:

the steps of generating the license metric and determining compliance of the plurality of overlapping licenses are performed in response to a triggering event,

the triggering event comprises adding a new software product to be governed by the plurality of overlapping licenses, and

the logic is further operable when executed to associate the new software product with the plurality of overlapping licenses executed by the licensee.

21. The non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 7, wherein:

the steps of generating the license metric and determining compliance of the plurality of overlapping licenses are performed in response to a triggering event, and

the triggering event comprises disassociating a software product from the plurality of overlapping licenses, the software product no longer governed by the plurality of overlapping licenses executed by the licensee.

22. The non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 7, wherein the logic is operable when executed to determine if the licensee is in compliance with the plurality of overlapping licenses by:

calculating a summation of the number of instances that the software product may be used according to a first executed license and the number of instances that the software product may be used according to a second executed license;

determining that the licensee is in compliance with first and second executed licenses if the total number of instances of use is less than or equal to the summation of the number of instances that the software product may be used according to the first executed license and the number of instances that the software product may be used according to the second executed license; and

determining that the licensee is not in compliance with first and second executed licenses if the total number of instances of use is more than the summation of the number of instances that the software product may be used according to the first executed license and the number of instances that the software product may be used according to the second executed license.

23. The non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 7, wherein the logic is operable when executed to determine if the licensee is in compliance with the plurality of overlapping licenses by:

generating a matrix comprising a plurality of rows and a plurality of columns, wherein each row contains data associated with a selected one of the plurality of executed and overlapping licenses and each column contains represents a respective one of a plurality of software products;

for each column of the matrix, calculating a number of instances that each of the plurality of software products are used by the plurality of client systems associated with the licensee; and

for each of row of the matrix, calculating a total number of instances that the plurality of software products may be used for each of the plurality of executed and overlapping licenses.

24. The non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 7, wherein the logic is further operable when executed to:

present one or more selectable criteria by presenting a wizard type graphical user interface to the user, the wizard type graphical user interface displaying one or more fill in the blank statements to the user; and

form a sentence based on the one or more selections of the one or more selectable criteria received from the user, the sentence summarizing the respective software license restriction.

25. The non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 7, wherein the one or more selectable criteria comprises a restriction limiting installation of the software product to a set list of a plurality of hardware devices.