Chainage calculation methodology and system

• US 8,725,761 B2
• Filed: 06/16/2011
• Issued: 05/13/2014
• Est. Priority Date: 06/16/2011
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: New York Air Brake Corporation (Knorr-Bremse GmbH)
• Original Assignee: New York Air Brake Corporation (Knorr-Bremse GmbH)
• Inventors: Rout, Ranjan
• Primary Examiner(s): Perveen, Rehana
• Assistant Examiner(s): Khong, Alexander
• Application Number:
  US13/162,306
• Publication Number:
  US 20120323957A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,062 Days
• Field of Search: 707/800, 707/769
• US Class Current: 707/769
• CPC Class Codes: B61L 15/0058 On-board optimisation of vehicle or vehicle train operation
• CPC Class Codes: B61L 15/0072 On-board train data handling
• CPC Class Codes: B61L 2205/04 Satellite based navigation systems, e.g. global positioning system [GPS]
• CPC Class Codes: B61L 25/025 Absolute localisation, e.g. providing geodetic coordinates

Abstract

Disclosed embodiments provide a methodology and architecture for calculating the chainage distance using two Positive Train Control (PTC) system messages (e.g., Train Route and Current Position) provided by the PTC system.

Claims

1. A chainage calculation system for calculating the chainage distance using Positive Train Control (PTC) messages, the system

receiving a PTC Current Position message and a PTC Train Route message, wherein the PTC Current Position message provides an absolute position of the train head end in relation to both a stored track database and the PTC Train Route message, wherein the PTC Train Route message includes a track segment ID field, and wherein the messages are wirelessly received on board a locomotive,

wherein the system utilizes data included in the received PTC Current Position message to determine a last direction of travel for the train when such data is available and compares an existing linked list with data received in the PTC Train Route message to determine whether the PTC Train Route message includes any matches to the linked list if it is determined that the received PTC Train Route message is not a first PTC Train Route message received and a last direction of travel for the train is not known, wherein each node of the existing linked list includes a track segment ID field,

wherein the system adds or deletes nodes of the existing linked list based on the comparison of the existing linked list with the data received in the PTC Train Route message to produce an updated linked list and deletes a linked list and calculates an updated linked list if the received PTC Train Route message is the first PTC Train Route message received, the PTC Train Route message is not the first PTC Train Route message but the last direction of travel for the train is known, or it is determined that the Train Route message does not include any matches to the existing linked list,

wherein the chainage distance is re-calculated based on the comparison of the existing linked list with the data received in the PTC Train Route Message if an updated linked list is calculated, wherein the chainage distance calculation is optionally omitted based on the comparison, and

wherein the system is implemented in at least one computer processing unit coupled to a memory that stores computer instructions for controlling operations of the at least one computer processing unit to perform operations for calculating the chainage distance.

2. The system of claim 1, wherein the comparison of whether the PTC Train Route message includes matches to the existing linked list determines if the PTC Train Route Message matches some portion or all of the existing linked list of segments.

3. The system of claim 1, wherein the the comparison of whether the PTC Train Route message determines whether a current segment in the PTC Train Route message is in the existing linked list of segments, designates the current segment accordingly and increments to a next segment in the PTC Train Route message to be checked if any.

4. The system of claim 1, wherein, when it is determined that the existing linked list and the PTC Train Route message are identical, the PTC Train Route message and the existing linked list are considered matching and recalculation of the chainage distance is omitted.

5. The system of claim 1, wherein, when it is determined that the existing linked list and the PTC Train Route message are not matching, re-calculation of the chainage distance is omitted.

6. The system of claim 1, wherein the system receives the PTC Current Position and PTC Train Route message from a Positive Train Control (PTC) system.

7. The system of claim 6, wherein the PTC system is located on the train and receives information about the train location and where the train is allowed to travel from off-board the train.

8. The system of claim 1, wherein the system analyzes the PTC Current Position message to determine an absolute position of a head end of the train.

9. The system of claim 1, wherein the system re-calculates the chainage distance in response to receipt of the PTC Train Route message based on analysis of the data of the PTC Train Route message in comparison with a linked list of track segments.

10. The system of claim 1, wherein the existing linked list includes segments associated with track segments along a train'"'"'s route, wherein for each segment, a chainage distance is associated with a beginning of the track segment.

11. The system of claim 1, wherein the calculated chainage distance is utilized to increase fuel efficiency and/or to perform locomotive diagnostics for train maintenance.

12. The system of claim 1, wherein energy management behavior of the train is modeled and managed using the calculated chainage distance.

13. A method for calculating the chainage distance, the method comprising:

receiving a PTC Current Position message and a PTC Train Route message, wherein the PTC Current Position message provides an absolute position of the train head end in relation to both a stored track database and the PTC Train Route message, wherein the PTC Train Route message includes a track segment ID field, and wherein the PTC Current Position message and the Train Route message are received wirelessly on board a locomotive;

utilizing data included in the received PTC Current Position message to determine a last direction of travel for the train when such data is available;

comparing an existing linked list with data received in the PTC Train Route message to determine whether the PTC Train Route message includes any matches to the linked list if it is determined that the received PTC Train Route message is not a first PTC Train Route message received and a last direction of travel for the train is not known;

adding or deleting nodes of the existing linked list based on the comparison of the existing linked list with the data received in the PTC Train Route message to produce an updated linked list;

deleting a linked list and calculating an updated linked list if the received PTC Train Route message is the first PTC Train Route message received, the PTC Train Route message is not the first PTC Train Route message but the last direction of travel for the train is known, or it is determined that the PTC Train Route message does not include any matches to the existing linked list, and

re-calculating the chainage distance based on the determination performed by the comparison if an updated linked list is calculated, wherein the chainage distance calculation is optionally omitted based on the comparison.

14. The method of claim 13, wherein the comparison of whether the PTC Train Route message includes matches to the existing linked list determines if the PTC Train Route Message matches some portion or all of the existing linked list of segments.

15. The method of claim 13, wherein the comparison whether the PTC Train Route message determines whether a current segment in the PTC Train Route message is in the existing linked list of segments, designates the current segment accordingly and increments to a next segment in the PTC Train Route message to be checked if any.

16. The method of claim 13, wherein, when it is determined that the existing linked list and the PTC Train Route message are identical, the PTC Train Route message and the existing linked list are considered matching and re-calculation of the chainage distance is omitted.

17. The method of claim 13, wherein, when it is determined that the existing linked list and the PTC Train Route message are not matching, recalculation of the chainage distance is omitted.

18. The method of claim 13, further comprising receiving the PTC Current Position and PTC Train Route message receives such messages from a Positive Train Control (PTC) system.

19. The method of claim 18, wherein the PTC system is located on the train and receives information about the train location and where the train is allowed to travel from off-board the train.

20. The method of claim 13, further comprising analyzing the PTC Current Position message to determine an absolute position of a head end of the train.

21. The method of claim 13, wherein the calculation of the chainage distance performed in response to receipt of the PTC Train Route message is based on analysis of the data of the PTC Train Route message in comparison with a linked list of track segments.

22. The method of claim 13, wherein the existing linked list includes segments associated with track segments along a train'"'"'s route, wherein for each segment, a chainage distance is associated with a beginning of the track segment.

23. The method of claim 13, wherein the calculated chainage distance is utilized to increase fuel efficiency and/or to perform locomotive diagnostics for train maintenance.

24. The method of claim 13, wherein energy management behavior of the train is modeled and managed using the calculated chainage distance.