Holistic cybernetic vehicle control

• US 8,731,815 B2
• Filed: 09/18/2009
• Issued: 05/20/2014
• Est. Priority Date: 09/18/2009
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Charles Arnold Cummings
• Original Assignee: Charles Arnold Cummings
• Inventors: Cummings, Charles Arnold
• Primary Examiner(s): Nguyen, Cuong H
• Application Number:
  US12/291,635
• Publication Number:
  US 20110071761A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,705 Days
• Field of Search: 701 24- 25, 701/301, 701/532, 700/255, 700/258, 340/436, 340/945, 340/961, 340/933, 340/936, 340/435, 340/903, 318/567, 342/350, 342/451, 342 29- 30, 342/59, 342/71
• US Class Current: 701/301
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2555/20 Ambient conditions, e.g. wind or rain
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 30/09 Taking automatic action to avoid collision, e.g. braking and steering
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 30/0953 the prediction being responsive to vehicle dynamic parameters
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 30/0956 the prediction being responsive to traffic or environmental parameters
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 50/16 Tactile feedback to the driver, e.g. vibration or force feedback to the driver on the steering wheel or the accelerator pedal
• CPC Class Codes: G08G 1/165 for passive traffic, e.g. including static obstacles, trees
• CPC Class Codes: G08G 1/166 for active traffic, e.g. moving vehicles, pedestrians, bikes

Abstract

Holistic cybernetic vehicle control enables the results of machine sensing and decision making to be communicated to a vehicle operator through the various senses of the operator. By providing machine advice to the operator through various vehicle functions and by integrating the machine advice with what the operator senses and perceives, holistic cybernetic control can result in much better and safer vehicle operation. The invention integrates human and machine vehicle control action to improve vehicle operation and, particularly, to avoid collision events.

Claims

1. A method for controlling a vehicle using holistic cybernetic vehicle control to prevent collisions, the vehicle having a human operator and a vehicle control system comprising manual controls, a computer, sensors, control actuators, and other information delivery apparatus, the method comprising:

using at least one of the sensors to monitor the vehicle'"'"'s external environment and provide input to the computer;

using at least one of the sensors to monitor the operator and provide input to the computer;

using the computer to identify a potential threat based on data from at least one of the sensors;

using the computer to determine action to be taken by at least one of the control actuators;

using the computer to control the at least one control actuator to provide suggested vehicle control actions through the manual controls;

delivering the suggested actions to the human operator through the actuated manual controls and other information delivery apparatus of the vehicle;

modifying the actuated vehicle control actions and other information delivery apparatus in response to additional input from the at least one sensor to provide further suggested actions to the operator;

allowing the operator to override the suggested actions of the holistic cybernetic vehicle control when the operator deems such action necessary; and

actions of said holistic cybernetic vehicle control including;

bias against movement of said manual controls;

movement of said manual controls;

modification of controls to affect vehicle movement;

flashing vehicle lights to communicate with operators of other vehicles;

vehicle speed adjustment based on movement and distance to other vehicles;

vehicle speed adjustment based on the position of nonmoving objects;

vehicle speed adjustment based on sensed road conditions; and

vehicle separation adjustment based on vehicle speed and the speed of other vehicles.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of actuating holistic cybernetic vehicle control actions further comprises at least one of the following:

biasing a brake pedal in proportion to the braking force applied by the vehicle control system to the brakes;

biasing an acceleration pedal in proportion to engine acceleration applied by the vehicle control system;

biasing a steering wheel in the direction of and in proportion to the steering force applied by the vehicle control system;

moving a horn button in accordance with horn blowing applied by the vehicle control system; and

moving a light switch in accordance with light flashing applied by the vehicle control system.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of modifying the suggested control actions in response to input from the sensors comprises repeatedly modifying the control actions until modification is no longer needed.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of modifying the control actions in response to sensor input comprises responding to the operator'"'"'s reaction to the control actions.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein responding to the operator'"'"'s reaction to the control actions comprises resisting a control action taken by the operator.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of actuating vehicle control actions comprises providing feedback to the operator to help prevent collision and informing the operator about the nature of the potential collision threat.

7. The method of claim 6, further comprising the steps of:

monitoring a closing velocity relative to an object near the vehicle when the object is in an adjacent lane; and

applying resistance to a steering wheel of the vehicle such that the operator will be prompted not to steer the vehicle into the adjacent lane when the closing velocity exceeds a threshold velocity.

8. The method of claim 1, further comprising the steps of:

monitoring a closing velocity relative to an object in front of the vehicle, and

decreasing the velocity of the vehicle by a calculated amount when the closing velocity exceeds a predetermined threshold velocity.

9. The method of claim 1, further comprising the steps of:

monitoring a closing velocity relative to an object behind the vehicle; and

flashing at least one rear light of the vehicle when the closing velocity exceeds a predetermined threshold velocity.

10. The method of claim 1, further comprising the steps of:

monitoring objects at an intersection being approached by the vehicle;

determining whether the safest course of action is to brake or accelerate when any of the objects is a potential collision threat;

increasing the speed of the vehicle by a calculated amount when the safest course of action is to accelerate; and

decreasing the speed of the vehicle by a calculated amount when the safest course of action is to brake.

11. The method of claim 1, further comprising the steps of:

monitoring a closing velocity relative to objects directly behind the vehicle when backing up; and

stopping the vehicle before impact occurs when the closing velocity is determined by the computer to be unsafe.

12. The method of claim 1, further comprising the steps of:

monitoring an object in an adjacent lane wherein the object is approaching the vehicle while crossing the center line of a roadway, and

initiating control actions to prevent a collision when the vehicle control system identifies the object as a collision threat.

13. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of monitoring the vehicle'"'"'s external environment includes monitoring weather conditions surrounding the vehicle.

14. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of monitoring the vehicle'"'"'s external environment comprises monitoring road conditions.

15. The method of claim 1, wherein the vehicle control system comprises an attachable vehicle roof cap housing physical components of the vehicle control system.

16. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of modifying the control actions in response to feedback comprises modifying the control actions in response to communication with another vehicle.