Monitoring for disturbance of optical fiber

• US 8,736,826 B2
• Filed: 01/20/2012
• Issued: 05/27/2014
• Est. Priority Date: 01/20/2012
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Network Integrity Systems, Inc.
• Original Assignee: Norscan Instruments Ltd.
• Inventors: Lovely, Peter Scott, Brown, Michael James
• Primary Examiner(s): Geisel, Kara E.
• Assistant Examiner(s): Ayub, Hina F
• Application Number:
  US13/355,406
• Publication Number:
  US 20130188176A1
• Time in Patent Office: 858 Days
• Field of Search: 356/73.1, 398 9- 16
• US Class Current: 356/73.1
• CPC Class Codes: G01D 5/353 influencing the transmission properties of an optical fibre
• CPC Class Codes: G01D 5/35351 using other means to detect the measured quantity
• CPC Class Codes: G01M 11/33 with a light emitter being disposed at one fibre or waveguide end-face, and a light receiver at the other end-face

Abstract

Problems of excessive fading in systems for monitoring single-mode optical fiber for physical disturbances are addressed by launching into the fiber polarized light having at least two different predetermined launch states of polarization whose respective Stokes vectors are linearly-independent of each other; downstream from the first location, receiving the light from the fiber; analyzing the received light using polarization state analyzer means having at least two different analyzer states of polarization that are characterized by respective Stokes vectors that are linearly-independent of each other and detecting the analyzed light to provide corresponding detection signals; deriving from the detection signals measures of changes in polarization transformation properties of the fiber between different times that are substantially independent of said launch states and said detection states; and, on the basis of predefined acceptable physical disturbance criteria determining whether or not the measures are indicative of a reportable physical disturbance.

Claims

1. A method of monitoring a length of single-mode optical fiber for physical disturbance along its length, comprising the steps of:

(i) at a first location, launching into the fiber polarized light having at least two different predetermined launch states of polarization (L_a,L_b) whose respective Stokes vectors (s_La, s_Lb) are linearly independent of each other;

(ii) at a second location downstream from the first location, receiving the light from the fiber;

(iii) analyzing the received light using at least two different analyzer states of polarization that are characterized by respective Stokes vectors that are linearly-independent of each other;

(iv) detecting the analyzed light to provide corresponding electrical detection signals and deriving therefrom corresponding digital detection signals;

(v) deriving from the digital detection signals one or more representations ([s_a(t₁), s_b(t₁)], [s_a(t₂), s_b(t₂)];

M(t₁,t₂);

c(t₁,t₂);

C(t₁), C(t₂)) of a change in the polarization coupling properties (R) of the fiber between a first time (t₁) and a second time (t₂);

(vi) computing from said one or more representations at least one measure of change in polarization coupling properties of the fiber, said at least one measure being substantially independent of said launch states and said analyzer states; and

(vii) determining with reference to preselected criteria of reportable physical disturbances whether or not said at least one measure indicates a reportable physical disturbance along said length of fiber.

2. A method according to claim 1, wherein said one or more representations comprise a plurality of said representations ([s_a(t₁), s_b(t₁)], [s_a(t₂), s_b(t₂)];

M(t₁,t₂);

c(t₁,t₂);

C(t₁), C(t₂)) over a predetermined period of time, each successive representation being stored and with preceding representations providing change information comprising a sequence ([s_a(t₁), s_b(t₁)], [s_a(t₂), s_b(t₂)], [s_a(t₃), s_b(t₃)], . . . ;

M(t₁,t₂), M(t₂,t₃), . . . ;

c(t₁,t₂), c(t₂,t₃), . . . ;

C(t₀), C(t₁), C(t₂), . . . ) of change information for the fiber polarization coupling (R) over said predetermined period of time.

3. A method according to claim 1, wherein said at least one measure and said preselected criteria are based upon the time domain.

4. A method according to claim 1, wherein said at least one measure and said preselected criteria are based upon the frequency domain.

5. A method according to claim 1, wherein said at least one measure is based upon either or both of time domain and frequency domain and said preselected criteria are based upon either or both of time domain and frequency domain and said determination is based upon geometric properties of the changes in the polarization coupling.

6. A method according to claim 1, wherein said at least one measure and said preselected criteria are based upon the frequency domain, and the determination

(i) uses Fourier analysis to convert the change information over a prescribed time period into the frequency domain and obtain a power spectrum characterizing the apparent disturbance,

(ii) computes measures of the power distribution in different frequency bands, and

(iii) compares the measures with values for these measures that are known to characterize reportable and/or unreportable disturbances.

7. A method according to claim 6, wherein the determination of whether or not a reportable disturbance is indicated is made by analysis of the power spectrum to identify one or more frequencies at which the power level fails to meet specified power-frequency criteria.

8. A method according to claim 1, wherein said at least one measure and said preselected criteria are both based upon the time domain and the method further comprises computing from the one or more representations at least one further measure based upon the frequency domain, wherein said at least one measure and said preselected criteria are based upon the frequency domain, and the determination

(i) uses Fourier analysis to convert the change information over a prescribed time period into the frequency domain and obtain a power spectrum characterizing the apparent disturbance,

(ii) computes measures of the power distribution in different frequency bands, and

(iii) compares the measures with further preselected criteria comprising values for these measures that are known to characterize reportable and/or unreportable disturbances.

9. A method according to claim 1, wherein said criteria include preset thresholds representing acceptable changes in the fiber transformation properties and the determination is made according to how many times the threshold is exceed within a specified period of time.

10. A system for monitoring a length of single-mode optical fiber for physical disturbance at a location or zone (L) along its length, comprises a launch unit and a monitoring unit:

the launch unit being adapted for launching into one end of the length of fiber polarized light at a first location light having at least two different predetermined launch states of polarization (L_a,L_b) whose respective Stokes vectors (s_La, s_Lb) are linearly independent of each other;

the monitoring unit being adapted for receiving the light from a second end of the fiber and comprising;

a polarization analyzer system for analyzing the received light using at least two different analyzer states of polarization that are characterized by respective Stokes vectors that are linearly-independent of each other;

an optical detection system for detecting the analyzed light and providing corresponding electrical detection signals;

an analog-to-digital convertor system for deriving from the electrical detection signals corresponding digital detection signals;

a processor operable for;

(i) deriving from the digital detection signals one or more representations ([s_a(t₁), s_b(t₁)], [s_a(t₂), s_b(t₂)];

M(t₁,t₂);

c(t₁,t₂);

C(t₁), C(t₂)) of a change in the polarization coupling properties (R) of the fiber between a first time (t₁) and a second time (t₂);

(ii) computing from said one or more representations at least one measure of change in polarization coupling properties of the fiber, said at least one measure being substantially independent of said launch states and said analyzer states; and

(iii) determining with reference to preselected criteria of reportable physical disturbances whether or not said measure or measures indicate a reportable physical disturbance.

11. A system according to claim 10, wherein said one or more representations comprise a plurality of said representations (M(t₁,t₂);

c(t₁,t₂);

C(t₂)) derived over a predetermined period of time, the processor storing each successive representation with preceding representations, if any, to provide change information comprising a sequence (M(t₁,t₂), M(t₂,t₃), . . . ;

c(t₁,t₂), c(t₂,t₃), . . . ;

C(t₀), C(t₁), C(t₂), . . . ) of change information for the fiber polarization coupling (R) over said predetermined period of time.

12. A system according to claim 10, wherein said at least one measure and said preselected criteria are based upon the time domain.

13. A system according to claim 10, wherein said at least one measure and said preselected criteria are based upon the frequency domain.

14. A system according to claim 10, wherein said at least one measure is based upon either or both of time domain and frequency domain and said preselected criteria are based upon either or both of time domain and frequency domain and said determination is based upon geometric properties of the changes in the polarization coupling.

15. A system according to claim 10, wherein said at least one measure and said preselected criteria are based upon the frequency domain, and in making the determination the processor

(i) uses Fourier analysis to convert the change information over a prescribed time period into the frequency domain and obtain a power spectrum characterizing the apparent disturbance,

(ii) computes measures of the power distribution in different frequency bands, and

(iii) compares the measures with values for these measures that are known to characterize reportable and/or unreportable disturbances.

16. A system according to claim 10, wherein the determination of whether or not a reportable disturbance is indicated is made by analysis of a power spectrum of the change information to identify one or a combination of frequencies for which a spectral power level fails to meet specified power-frequency criteria.

17. A system according to claim 10, wherein said at least one measure and said preselected criteria are both based upon the time domain and the processor further computes from the one or more representations at least one further measure based upon the frequency domain, wherein said at least one measure and said preselected criteria are based upon the frequency domain, wherein the processor uses Fourier analysis to convert the change information over a prescribed time period into the frequency domain and obtain a power spectrum characterizing the apparent disturbance, computes measures of the power distribution in different frequency bands, and compares the measures with further preselected criteria comprising values for these measures that are known to characterize reportable and/or unreportable disturbances.

18. A system according to claim 10, wherein said criteria include preset thresholds representing acceptable changes in the fiber transformation properties and the determination is made according to how many times the threshold is exceed within a specified period of time.