Method and system for non-disruptive migration

• US 8,812,806 B2
• Filed: 10/29/2010
• Issued: 08/19/2014
• Est. Priority Date: 10/29/2010
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: NetApp, Inc.
• Original Assignee: NetApp, Inc.
• Inventors: Fredricksen, John, Chang, Chung-Yen, Somavarapu, Nagender
• Primary Examiner(s): RUTZ, JARED IAN
• Application Number:
  US12/915,867
• Publication Number:
  US 20120110279A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,390 Days
• Field of Search: 711/161, 711/165, 707/602
• US Class Current: 711/165
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/119 Details of migration of file systems migration mechanisms in storage systems G06F3/0647
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 3/0647 Migration mechanisms

Abstract

Method and system for migrating a virtual storage system from a source storage system having access to a source storage device to a destination storage system having access to a destination storage device is provided. A processor executable management application estimates a likelihood of success for a migration operation before the migration operation enters a cut-over duration during which client access to the source storage system and the destination storage system is restricted. The migration operation enters the cut-over duration if there is high likelihood of success for completing the migration during the cut-over duration or aborted, if there is a low likelihood of success for completing the migration during the cut-over duration.

Claims

1. A machine implemented method for migrating a virtual storage system from a source storage system having access to a source storage device to a destination storage system having access to a destination storage device, where the source storage system executes a processor executable storage operating system for presenting the virtual storage system to a plurality of client systems and managing the source storage device to read and write information at the source storage device for the plurality of client systems via the virtual storage system, comprising:

prior to entering a cut-over duration for completing a migration operation, determining a projected workload of the source storage system during the cut-over duration;

wherein the plurality of client systems can access the source storage device via the virtual storage system during the migration operation, except during the cut-over duration when access to the source storage device is restricted;

determining a projected work load of the destination storage system during the cut-over duration when access to the destination storage system is restricted;

wherein the projected workload of the source storage system and the destination storage system during the cut-over duration is based on a factor that indicates how busy a processor of the source storage system and a processor of the destination storage system will be during the cut-over duration;

a number of sequential and random read and write operations at the source storage system and the destination storage system during the cut-over duration; and

a numerical factor to quantify an affect of the sequential and random read and write operations on the migration operation;

determining projected utilization of the destination storage device after the cut-over duration, if the virtual storage system were to be successfully migrated from the source storage system to the destination storage system within the cut-over duration;

estimating a likelihood of success for completing the migration operation in response to the migration request within the cut-over duration; and

proceeding with the migration operation in response to the migration request based on the estimated likelihood of success when the migration operation can be completed within the cut-over duration and an acceptable projected utilization of the destination storage device after the migration is completed.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising;

aborting the migration operation if the estimated likelihood of success for completing the migration operation is unacceptable.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the projected work load of the source storage system and the destination storage system are compared to a first threshold value and the estimated likelihood of success is determined based on the comparison.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the projected utilization of the destination storage device is compared to a second threshold value and the estimated likelihood of success is determined based on the comparison.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the source storage system and the destination storage system are included within a cluster system.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the source storage system and the destination storage system are based in a non-cluster based system.

7. A machine implemented method for migrating a virtual storage system from a source storage system having access to a source storage device to a destination storage system having access to a destination storage device, where the source storage system executes a processor executable storage operating system for presenting the virtual storage system to a plurality of client systems and managing the source storage device to read and write information at the source storage device for the plurality of client systems via the virtual storage system, comprising:

prior to entering a cut-over duration, estimating a likelihood of success for completing a migration operation for migrating the virtual storage system from the source storage system to the destination storage system;

wherein the likelihood of success for completing the migration operation is based on a projected workload of the source storage system and the destination storage system during the cut-over duration, when access to the source storage device is restricted; and

the projected utilization is based on a factor that indicates how busy a processor of the source storage system and a processor of the destination storage system will be during the cut-over duration;

a number of sequential and random read and write operations at the source storage system and the destination storage system during the cut-over duration; and

a numerical factor to quantify an affect of the sequential and random read and write operations on the migration operation;

determining if the estimated likelihood of success is acceptable or unacceptable;

wherein the likelihood of success is acceptable when the migration operation can be completed within the cut-over duration and a destination storage device is able to manage post migration operations; and

aborting a migration operation if the estimated likelihood of success is unacceptable.

8. The method of claim 7, further comprising;

proceeding with the migration operation if the estimated likelihood of success is acceptable.

9. The method of claim 7, wherein the projected work load of the source storage system and the destination storage system is determined by a management application prior to entering the cut-over duration when access to the source storage system and the destination storage system is restricted.

10. The method of claim 7, wherein the source storage system and the destination storage system are included within a cluster system.

11. The method of claim 7, wherein the source storage system and the destination storage system are based in a non-cluster based system.

12. A method for migrating a virtual storage system managed by a source storage system having access to a source storage device to a destination storage system having access to a destination storage device, where the source storage system executes a processor executable storage operating system for presenting the virtual storage system to a plurality of client systems and managing the source storage device to read and write information at the source storage device for the plurality of client systems via the virtual storage system, comprising;

estimating a likelihood of success for completing a migration operation based on a projected usage of the source storage system and the destination storage system during a cut-over duration when access to the source storage system and the destination storage system is restricted; and

a projected utilization of the destination storage device after the cut-over duration, if the migration operation were to be successfully completed;

wherein the projected workload of the source storage system and the destination storage system during the cut-over duration is based on a factor that indicates how busy a processor of the source storage system and a processor of the destination storage system will be during the cut-over duration;

a number of sequential and random read and write operations at the source storage system and the destination storage system during the cut-over duration; and

a numerical factor to quantify an affect of the sequential and random read and write operations on the migration operation; and

aborting the migration operation, if the estimated likelihood of success is unacceptable when the migration operation cannot be completed within the cut-over duration or if the projected utilization of the destination storage device after the cut-over duration is unacceptable.

13. The method of claim 12, further comprising:

proceeding with the migration operation, if the estimated likelihood of success is acceptable.

14. The method of claim 12, wherein the projected work load of the source storage system and the destination storage system are compared to a first threshold value and the estimated likelihood of success is determined based on the comparison.

15. The method of claim 12, wherein the projected utilization of the destination storage device is compared to a second threshold value and the estimated likelihood of success is determined based on the comparison.

16. The method of claim 12, wherein the source storage system and the destination storage system are included within a cluster system.

17. The method of claim 12, wherein the source storage system and the destination storage system are based in a non-cluster based system.

18. A system, comprising:

a processor for a source storage system executing a storage operating system for presenting a virtual storage system to a plurality of client systems and managing a source storage device to read and write information at the source storage device for the plurality of client systems via the virtual storage system;

a processor for a destination storage system having access to a destination storage device;

wherein, during a migration operation, the virtual storage system is migrated from the source storage system to the destination storage system; and

a processor for a computing system executing a management application, where the management application interfaces with the source storage system and the destination storage system for estimating a likelihood of success for completing the migration operation based on a projected usage of the source storage system and the destination storage system during a cut-over duration when access to the source storage system and the destination storage system is restricted; and

a projected utilization of the destination storage device after the cut-over duration, if the migration operation were to be successfully completed;

wherein the projected workload of the source storage system and the destination storage system during the cut-over duration is based on a factor that indicates how busy a processor of the source storage system and a processor of the destination storage system will be during the cut-over duration;

a number of sequential and random read and write operations at the source storage system and the destination storage system during the cut-over duration;

and a numerical factor to quantify an affect of the sequential and random read and write operations on the migration operation; and

wherein the migration operation is aborted, if the estimated likelihood of success is unacceptable when the migration operation cannot be completed during the cut-over duration or if the projected utilization of the destination storage is unacceptable.

19. The system of claim 18, wherein the migration operation is completed, if the estimated likelihood of success is acceptable.

20. The system of claim 18, wherein the projected work load of the source storage system and the destination storage system are compared to a first threshold value and the estimated likelihood of success is determined based on the comparison.

21. The system of claim 18, wherein the projected utilization of the destination storage device is compared to a second threshold value and the estimated likelihood of success is determined based on the comparison.

22. A non-transitory, machine readable storage medium storing executable instructions, which when executed by a machine, causes the machine to perform a method for migrating a virtual storage system from a source storage system to a destination storage system, the method comprising:

prior to entering a cut-over duration, estimating a likelihood of success for completing a migration operation for migrating the virtual storage system from the source storage system to the destination storage system;

wherein the likelihood of success for completing the migration operation is based on a projected workload of the source storage system and the destination storage system during the cut-over duration, when access to the source storage device is restricted; and

the projected utilization is based on a factor that indicates how busy a processor of the source storage system and a processor of the destination storage system will be during the cut-over duration;

a number of sequential and random read and write operations at the source storage system and the destination storage system during the cut-over duration; and

a numerical factor to quantify an affect of the sequential and random read and write operations on the migration operation;

determining if the estimated likelihood of success is acceptable or unacceptable;

wherein the likelihood of success is acceptable when the migration operation can be completed within the cut-over duration and a destination storage device is able to manage post migration operations; and

aborting the migration operation if the estimated likelihood of success is unacceptable.

23. The non-transitory storage medium of claim 22, wherein the migration operation enters the cut-over duration when the estimated likelihood of success is acceptable.

24. The non-transitory storage medium of claim 22, wherein the projected work load of the source storage system and the destination storage system is determined by a management application prior to entering the cut-over duration when access to the source storage system and the destination storage system is restricted.