Distributed document version control

• US 8,832,047 B2
• Filed: 07/27/2005
• Issued: 09/09/2014
• Est. Priority Date: 07/27/2005
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Adobe Inc.
• Original Assignee: Adobe Systems Incorporated (Adobe Inc.)
• Inventors: Herbach, Jonathan D., Gilchrist, Gary
• Primary Examiner(s): Mofiz, Apu
• Assistant Examiner(s): NGUYEN, THU N
• Application Number:
  US11/191,568
• Publication Number:
  US 20130212151A1
• Time in Patent Office: 3,331 Days
• US Class Current: 707/694
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/93 Document management systems
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/0823 using certificates cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for entity authentication involving certificates H04L9/3263
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 67/01 Protocols
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 67/10 in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network software deployment G06F8/60; multiprogramming arrangements G06F9/46
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 67/1095 Replication or mirroring of data, e.g. scheduling or transport for data synchronisation between network nodes
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 67/133 Protocols for remote procedure calls [RPC]

Abstract

Systems and techniques to provide distributed document version control. In general, in one implementation, the technique includes: receiving information, in a distributed document control system, specifying a locally saved copy of a first electronic document; determining, in response to the received information, whether the first electronic document should supersede a second electronic document in the distributed document control system; and storing, based on an outcome of the determining, information in the distributed document control system that links the first electronic document with the second electronic document in a superior-subordinate relationship such that when an action is requested with respect to the second, subordinate electronic document, the distributed document control system forces an action to be taken with respect to the first, superior electronic document. Various implementations include those in computer program products and client-server systems.

Claims

1. A computer-implemented method comprising:

receiving, by a server from a client, an offline audit log containing information with respect to modifications made to content provided within a first electronic document that is retained locally at the client, wherein the server forms part of a distributed document control system;

making a determination, without active participation of the document author, and based at least in part on the information contained within the offline audit log, whether the first electronic document should supersede a second electronic document in the distributed document control system; and

storing, based on the determination, information in the distributed document control system that links the first electronic document with the second electronic document in a superior-subordinate relationship such that when a request to modify content provided within the second electronic document is received, the distributed document control system forces content provided within the first electronic document to be modified;

where receiving the offline audit log, making the determination and storing information in the distributed document control system are performed by one or more computers programmed to perform these operations.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the first electronic document comprises a document secured previously by a permissions-broker server, the offline access log is received at the permissions-broker server, and making the determination comprises checking at the permissions-broker server for previously stored notification of edits performed on the first electronic document, the method further comprising:

receiving from a second client, at the permissions-broker server, the request to modify content provided within the second electronic document;

identifying, in response to the request at the permissions-broker server, the information that links the first electronic document with the second electronic document in the superior-subordinate relationship; and

imparting information to the second client concerning the first electronic document, wherein the second client prevents opening of the second electronic document and redirects a user to the first electronic document in response to the imparted information.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the second client redirects the user to the first electronic document by identifying a source from which the first electronic document can be obtained.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the first electronic document is saved by the client in a location that is inaccessible by the distributed document control system absent the client, the method further comprising:

storing a duplicate copy of the first electronic document, based on the determination, in a repository of the distributed document control system;

receiving the request to modify content provided within the second electronic document;

identifying, in response to the request, the information that links the first electronic document with the second electronic document in the superior-subordinate relationship; and

causing the duplicate copy of the first electronic document to be obtained and opened in place of the second electronic document.

5. The method of claim 1, further comprising receiving, at a permission-broker server, a request to secure the first electronic document with an anonymous user.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein making the determination comprises searching a data repository for document metadata matching that of the first electronic document.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein the matching document metadata comprises a filename and a securing user.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein making the determination comprises comparing document contents of the first electronic document and the second electronic document.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein comparing the document contents comprises comparing digital signatures embedded in the first and second electronic documents.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein making the determination comprises prompting a user regarding whether the first electronic document should supersede the second electronic document in the distributed document control system in response to the first electronic document being saved.

11. A computer program product, tangibly embodied in a computer-readable storage medium, operable to cause one or more data processing apparatus to perform operations comprising:

receiving, by a server from a client, an offline audit log containing information with respect to modifications made to content provided within a first electronic document that is retained locally at the client;

making a comparison of data of the first electronic document with data of a second electronic document to determine whether the first electronic document should supersede the second electronic document in a distributed document control system, wherein the determination is based, at least in part, on the information contained within the offline audit log; and

based on the determination, storing information in the distributed document control system that links the first electronic document with the second electronic document in a superior-subordinate relationship such that when a request to modify content provided within the second electronic document is received, the distributed document control system provides authorization to modify content provided within the first electronic document.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein making the determination comprises requesting permission from an author of the second electronic document regarding whether the first electronic document should supersede the second electronic document in the distributed document control system in response to the first electronic document being saved.

13. The computer program product of claim 11, wherein making the comparison comprises comparing cryptographic checksums of the first and second electronic documents.

14. The computer program product of claim 13, wherein comparing cryptographic checksums comprises comparing digital signatures embedded in the first and second electronic documents.

15. The computer program product of claim 11, wherein the first electronic document comprises a document secured previously by a permissions-broker server, and the offline audit log is received at the permissions-broker server.

16. The computer program product of claim 15, wherein the operations further comprise, based on the outcome of the comparison, storing a duplicate copy of the first electronic document in a repository of the distributed document control system.

17. A system comprising:

a client computer system, including a processor and a memory, operable to send a notification regarding a locally retained copy of a first electronic document, wherein the notification includes an offline audit log containing information with respect to modifications made to content provided within the first electronic document; and

a server computer system, including a processor and a memory, operable to receive the notification, and in response to the notification, the server computer system being operable to determine, based at least in part on the information contained within the offline audit log, whether the first electronic document should supersede a second electronic document, and store information that links the first electronic document with the second electronic document in a superior-subordinate relationship such that when a client attempts to modify content provided within the second electronic document, the server computer system provides authorization to modify content provided within the first electronic document in place of the second electronic document.

18. The system of claim 17, further comprising a document repository operable to store a duplicate copy of the first electronic document in response to a request from the client computer system.

19. The system of claim 17, wherein the server computer system is operable to determine whether the first electronic document should supersede the second electronic document by comparing document metadata, including filename, securing user and timestamp information.

20. The system of claim 17, wherein the server computer system is operable to determine whether the first electronic document should supersede the second electronic document by comparing cryptographic checksums of the first and second electronic documents.

21. The system of claim 20, wherein comparing the cryptographic checksums comprises comparing digital signatures embedded in the first and second electronic documents.