Integrated data traffic monitoring system

• US 8,832,833 B2
• Filed: 11/27/2009
• Issued: 09/09/2014
• Est. Priority Date: 01/23/2004
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: CloudCover Ltd.
• Original Assignee: The Barrier Group, LLC
• Inventors: Demopoulos, Robert James, Fladebo, David James
• Primary Examiner(s): Kyle, Tamara T
• Application Number:
  US12/592,580
• Publication Number:
  US 20100257598A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,747 Days
• Field of Search: 726 23- 25
• US Class Current: 726/23
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 21/552 involving long-term monitoring or reporting
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 41/16 using machine learning or artificial intelligence
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 51/212 using filtering or selective blocking
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/02 for separating internal from external traffic, e.g. firewalls
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/0209 Architectural arrangements, e.g. perimeter networks or demilitarized zones
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/0236 Filtering by address, protocol, port number or service, e.g. IP-address or URL
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/0245 Filtering by information in the payload
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/0254 Stateful filtering
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/0263 Rule management
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/0281 Proxies
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/1408 by monitoring network traffic monitoring network traffic per se H04L43/00
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/1416 Event detection, e.g. attack signature detection
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/1425 Traffic logging, e.g. anomaly detection
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/1441 Countermeasures against malicious traffic countermeasures against attacks on cryptographic mechanisms H04L9/002
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/145 the attack involving the propagation of malware through the network, e.g. viruses, trojans or worms
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/1458 Denial of Service
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/1466 Active attacks involving interception, injection, modification, spoofing of data unit addresses, e.g. hijacking, packet injection or TCP sequence number attacks
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/1475 Passive attacks, e.g. eavesdropping or listening without modification of the traffic monitored

Abstract

The present invention includes an integrated data traffic monitoring system monitoring data traffic received from a communication network and destined for a protected network. The monitoring system includes a security appliance and one or more security and monitoring technologies such as hardware and open source and proprietary software products. The security appliance and the security and monitoring technologies may be implemented as separate and distinct modules or combined into a single security appliance. The security and monitoring technologies monitor network data traffic on, or directed to, the protected network. The monitoring system collects data from each of the technologies into an event database and, based on the data, automatically generates rules directing one or more of the technologies to prevent subsequent communications traffic from specific sources from entering the protected network.

Claims

1. A method of screening packets received from a communication network comprising:

receiving a packet associated with one of an e-mail message, a VPN connection, and a web page response, the packet having a source;

performing an intrusion detection analysis on the packet using a set of intrusion detection rules;

if the packet passes the intrusion detection analysis, performing a firewall analysis on the packet using a set of firewall rules;

if the packet passes the firewall analysis, determining if the packet is associated with an e-mail message, a VPN connection or a web page response;

if the packet is associated with an e-mail message, performing a virus analysis on the packet using a set of virus definitions;

if the packet is associated with a VPN connection, performing an authentication analysis on the packet using a set of authentication criteria; and

if the packet fails any of the intrusion detection analysis, the firewall analysis, the virus analysis, or the authentication analysis, automatically generating a new intrusion detection rule to delete any subsequent packets received from the same source as the packet.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

if the packet fails any of the intrusion detection analysis, the firewall analysis, the virus analysis, or the authentication analysis, deleting the packet.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein automatically generating a new intrusion detection rule comprises:

generating event data based on the packet; and

storing at least some of the event data in a new event record associated with the packet in an event database having a plurality of event records associated with previously received packets.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein automatically generating a new intrusion detection rule further comprises:

automatically generating a new intrusion detection rule if one or more of the plurality of event records are associated with previously received packets from the source.

5. The method of claim 3, wherein the event data comprises a priority associated with the packet and automatically generating further comprises:

assigning an initial priority to the event data; and

automatically increasing a priority associated with the packet if one or more of the plurality of event records are associated with previously received packets from the source and the priority is less than a highest priority.

6. The method of claim 5, further comprising:

storing the priority assigned to the event data with the event data.