Interference control mechanism in multi-band communication

• US 8,837,401 B2
• Filed: 02/06/2012
• Issued: 09/16/2014
• Est. Priority Date: 01/30/2012
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Avago Technologies International Sales Pte Limited (Broadcom, Inc.)
• Original Assignee: Broadcom Corporation (Broadcom, Inc.)
• Inventors: Ranta, Jukka, Isokangas, Jari, Kaukovuori, Jouni Kristian, Immonen, Antti Oskari
• Primary Examiner(s): Masur, Paul H
• Assistant Examiner(s): PHILLIPS, MICHAEL K
• Application Number:
  US13/366,639
• Publication Number:
  US 20130194938A1
• Time in Patent Office: 953 Days
• Field of Search: 370/252, 370/328, 370/332, 370/230, 370/338, 370/339, 370/437, 370/465, 370/517, 370/528, 370/529, 455/1, 455/63.1, 455/114.2, 455/296, 455/278.1
• US Class Current: 370/329
• CPC Class Codes: H04B 1/525 with means for reducing leakage of transmitter signal into the receiver
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 16/14 Spectrum sharing arrangements between different networks
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 72/1215 for collaboration of different radio technologies
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 72/541 using the level of interference
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 76/34 Selective release of ongoing connections
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 88/06 adapted for operation in multiple networks or having at least two operational modes, e.g. multi-mode terminals

Abstract

There is provided a mechanism for controlling communications conducted in multiple frequency bands so as to decrease an interference level between the communications. When an interference situation caused between a first set UL communications performed on at least two different frequency bands and a DL communication performed on another frequency band is determined, a frequency carrier deactivation processing is conducted so as to deactivate either one of carriers of the at least two frequency bands of the set of UL communications. The deactivation processing includes for example an autonomous denial on the UE side or an interference reporting with deactivation on the eNB side.

Claims

1. An apparatus comprising or disposed within a user equipment, the apparatus comprising:

at least one processor; and

at least one memory including computer program code;

the at least one memory and the computer program code configured, with the at least one processor, to cause the user equipment to perform at least;

an interference determination function configured to determine an interference situation caused between a first set of uplink communications performed on at least two different frequency bands and a second communication performed on another frequency band being different to the at least two frequency bands of the first set of uplink communications, and

a frequency carrier deactivation processing function by which the user equipment conducts an autonomous denial process that operates to deactivate at least one but less than all frequency carriers of the at least two frequency bands of the first set of uplink communications in case the interference situation is determined.

2. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the interference determination function is configured to determine the interference situation on the basis of a comparison between scheduled or estimated timings for transmissions in the first set of uplink communications and scheduled or estimated timings for a transmission in the second communication.

3. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein:

the first set of uplink communications comprises at least two uplink communications to a cellular communication network using carrier aggregation and the at least one frequency carrier is a component carrier of the carrier aggregation, and

the second communication is a downlink communication using a non-cellular radio access technology,

wherein the interference situation comprises an interference through intermodulation.

4. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein:

the first set of uplink communications is conducted on frequency bands used for a cellular wireless communication system, and

the second communication is conducted on a frequency band used for at least one of an industrial, scientific and medical (ISM) communication, and a global navigation satellite system (GNSS) communication.

5. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the at least one memory and the computer program code are configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the user equipment to further perform at least:

an interference level estimation function configured to estimate a level of interference caused by the determined interference situation, to compare the estimated level of interference with a predetermined threshold, and to decide to cause the frequency carrier deactivation processing function to conduct the autonomous denial process in case the estimated level of interference is higher than the predetermined threshold, or to cause the frequency carrier deactivation processing function to stop the autonomous denial process in case the estimated level of interference is lower than the predetermined threshold.

6. The apparatus according to claim 5, wherein the interference level estimation function is further configured to estimate the level of interference by comparing a transmission output power level for communications of the first set of uplink communications with a preset power threshold.

7. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the user equipment includes plural transceivers capable of conducting in-device co-existence operation by communicating on different frequency bands.

8. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the user equipment autonomously deactivates the at least one frequency carrier according to an autonomous denial operation which comprises:

a selection process for selecting the at least one frequency carrier of the at least two frequency bands, and

a denial process for inhibiting a transmission on the selected at least one frequency carrier for a predetermined time based on the determined interference situation.

9. The apparatus according to claim 8, wherein the selection process selects the at least one frequency carrier on the basis of at least one of:

a determination which communication of the first set of uplink communications performed on the at least two different frequency bands does not comprise a control channel,

a determination which communication of the first set of uplink communications performed on the at least two different frequency bands has less resource blocks, and

which communication of the first set of uplink communications performed on the at least two different frequency bands causes more interference.

10. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the at least one memory and the computer program code are configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the user equipment to further perform at least:

an interference situation reporting function configured to cause the user equipment to send an interference report indicating the interference situation and comprising frequency information identifying the deactivated at least one frequency carrier.

11. A method for operating a user equipment, the method comprising:

determining an interference situation caused between a first set of uplink communications performed on at least two different frequency bands and a second communication performed on another frequency band being different to the at least two frequency bands of the first set of uplink communications, and

conducting an autonomous denial process that operates to deactivate at least one but less than all frequency carriers of the at least two frequency bands of the first set of uplink communications in case the interference situation is determined.

12. The method according to claim 11, wherein the interference situation is determined by comparing scheduled or estimated timings for transmissions in the first set of uplink communications against scheduled or estimated timings for a transmission in the second communication.

13. The method according to claim 11, wherein:

the first set of uplink communications comprises at least two uplink communications to a cellular communication network using carrier aggregation and the at least one frequency carrier is a component carrier of the carrier aggregation, and

the second communication is a downlink communication using a non-cellular radio access technology,

wherein the interference situation comprises an interference through intermodulation.

14. The method according to claim 11, wherein:

the first set of uplink communications is conducted on frequency bands used for a cellular wireless communication system, and

the second communication is conducted on a frequency band used for at least one of an industrial, scientific and medical (ISM) communication, and a global navigation satellite system (GNSS) communication.

15. The method according to claim 11, the method further comprising:

estimating a level of interference caused by the determined interference situation,

comparing the estimated level of interference with a predetermined threshold, and

deciding to conduct the autonomous denial process in case the estimated level of interference is higher than the predetermined threshold, or deciding to stop the autonomous denial process in case the estimated level of interference is lower than the predetermined threshold.

16. The method according to claim 15, wherein estimating the level of interference further estimates the level of interference by comparing a transmission output power level for communications of the first set of uplink communications with a preset power threshold.

17. The method according to claim 11, wherein the user equipment includes plural transceivers capable of conducting in-device co-existence operation by communicating on different frequency bands.

18. The method according to claim 11, wherein the user equipment autonomously deactivates the at least one frequency carrier according to an autonomous denial operation which comprises:

selecting the at least one frequency carrier of the at least two frequency bands, and

inhibiting a transmission on the selected at least one frequency carrier for a predetermined time based on the determined interference situation.

19. The method according to claim 18, wherein the at least one frequency carrier is selected on the basis of at least one of:

which communication of the first set of uplink communications performed on the at least two different frequency bands does not comprise a control channel,

which communication of the first set of uplink communications performed on the at least two different frequency bands has less resource blocks, and

which communication of the first set of uplink communications performed on the at least two different frequency bands causes more interference.

20. A memory storing computer program code which, when executed by at least one processor of a user equipment, causes the user equipment to:

determine an interference situation caused between a first set of uplink communications performed on at least two different frequency bands and a second communication performed on another frequency band being different to the at least two frequency bands of the first set of communications, and

conduct an autonomous denial process that operates to deactivate at least one but less than all frequency carriers of the at least two frequency bands of the first set of communications in case the interference situation is determined.