Lighting system having a multi-light source collimator and method of operating such

• US 8,866,406 B2
• Filed: 09/20/2012
• Issued: 10/21/2014
• Est. Priority Date: 09/26/2011
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Musco Corporation
• Original Assignee: Musco Corporation
• Inventors: Gordin, Myron, Boxler, Lawrence H.
• Primary Examiner(s): VU, JIMMY T
• Application Number:
  US13/623,153
• Publication Number:
  US 20130077304A1
• Time in Patent Office: 761 Days
• Field of Search: 315/185.R, 315/291, 315/307, 315/308, 315/312, 362/227, 362/235
• US Class Current: 315/291
• CPC Class Codes: F21K 9/90 Methods of manufacture
• CPC Class Codes: F21V 29/507 of means for protecting lighting devices from damage, e.g. housings
• CPC Class Codes: F21V 5/04 of lens shape
• CPC Class Codes: F21W 2131/105 of arenas or the like
• CPC Class Codes: F21W 2131/401 for swimming pools
• CPC Class Codes: F21W 2131/406 for theatres, stages or film studios
• CPC Class Codes: F21W 2131/407 for indoor arenas
• CPC Class Codes: F21Y 2105/10 comprising a two-dimensional array of point-like light-generating elements
• CPC Class Codes: F21Y 2115/10 Light-emitting diodes [LED]
• CPC Class Codes: Y10T 29/49004 including measuring or testing of device or component part

Abstract

A lens is provided which is elongated along an axis so to accommodate a linear array of LEDs, the elongation of the lens resulting in a corresponding elongation of the beam output pattern; in practice, the axis of elongation may be oriented so to suit a target area or some portion thereof. A methodology is provided for use with said lens so to evaluate various factors such as droop, heat management, and light output for a given combination of light sources and luminaire design. Alternative designs of lens, as well as alternative optical devices, are also presented for use with said methodology.

Claims

1. A method of determining efficacy of one or more light sources in a luminaire housing for a given set of operating conditions comprising:

a. thermally characterizing the luminaire housing for effectiveness as a heat sink comprising determining a housing temperature for the given set of operating conditions based on one or more of;

i. a physical dimension of at least a portion of the luminaire housing;

ii. a property of one or more materials from which the luminaire housing is comprised;

iii. the number of light sources in the luminaire housing;

iv. a thermal property of a light source in the luminaire housing; and

v. spacing between at least some of the light sources in the luminaire housing;

b. determining one or more light source output degradation factors for the one or more light sources at the given set of operating conditions based, at least in part, on (i) a measured light output of said one or more light sources at one or more operating conditions, and (ii) the thermal characterization of the luminaire housing or a deviation between the light output measurements and a reference data at the given set of operating conditions; and

c. predicting actual light output and/or efficacy of the one or more light sources at the operating conditions based on (i) the thermal characterization of the luminaire housing, (ii) a rated efficacy of the one or more light sources, and (iii) the one or more degradation factors.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the given set of operating conditions comprises an assumed forward operating current for the light sources when said light sources are operated in series.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein the one or more degradation factors comprise one or more of:

a. lumen depreciation of the light source relating to the given set of operating conditions;

b. lumen depreciation relating to other than the light sources.

4. The method of claim 2 wherein the light sources are solid state light sources and the one or more degradation factors comprises:

a. a temperature factor related to junction temperature of the solid state light sources; and

b. a droop factor related to droop of the solid state light sources.

5. The method of claim 4 wherein the step of determining the temperature factor comprises:

a. deriving a ratio between the measured light output and a junction temperature of at least one of the said solid state light sources wherein said junction temperature is determined, at least in part, on the thermal characterization of the luminaire housing.

6. The method of claim 4 wherein the step of determining the droop factor comprises:

a. deriving a ratio between the measured light output and the reference data at the forward current for the solid state light sources operating in series.

7. The method of claim 6 wherein the measured light output is derived from a light source manufacturer and the reference data assumes no light loss.

8. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of predicting actual light output and/or efficacy of said light sources comprises:

a. multiplying the rated luminous efficacy by a cumulative number and power of all said light sources in the luminaire housing; and

b. adjusting that product by;

i. a droop factor; and

ii. a temperature factor.

9. The method of claim 8 wherein the predicted actual light output and/or efficacy is used to:

a. design a luminaire and a corresponding beam output pattern issued therefrom;

b. select a configuration of light source arrays related to a number of light sources per area or space in the luminaire housing;

c. compare two luminaries of different light source, luminaire housing, or assumed operating conditions;

d. alter the design of a luminaire;

e. operate a luminaire;

or

f. adjust operation of a luminaire.

10. The method of claim 1 further comprising using the predicted actual light output and/or efficacy to achieve a target efficacy for a given luminaire housing.

11. The method of claim 1 further comprising using the predicted actual light output and/or efficacy to select a configuration for at least some of the light sources.

12. The method of claim 11 wherein the configuration comprises an optical component and at least some of said light sources in a linear array, with the array sharing the optical component.

13. The method of claim 12 wherein the optical component comprises a lens, a reflector, and/or a visor.

14. The method of claim 11 wherein the configuration comprises an optical component and least some of the light sources in a non-linear array, with the array sharing the optical component.

15. The method of claim 1 further comprising a lens for use with one or more light sources which share the lens, the lens comprising:

a. a lens body extending between;

i. a first surface which is formed to substantially encapsulate light-emitting portions of said one or more light sources which share the lens; and

ii. a second surface from which light from the one or more light sources which share the lens issues.

16. The method of claim 1 further comprising a reflector for use with one or more light sources which share the reflector, the reflector comprising:

a. a reflector body having;

i. a proximal portion through which the light-emitting portions of the one or more light sources which share the reflector at least partially extends;

ii. a reflective surface which captures and redirects at least some of the light emitted from the light sources which share the reflector;

iii. a distal portion from which (i) light emitted from the light sources and (ii) said captured and redirected light issues.

17. The method of claim 16 wherein the one or more light sources are placed in a linear array.

18. The method of claim 15 wherein the second surface is one of:

a. flat;

b. curved;

c. dimpled;

d. prismatic;

e. ribbed;

f. having a design of microlens;

or

g. having a void.

19. The method of claim 15 wherein the body has a generally parabolic profile.