Systems and methods for ranking and selection of pacing vectors

• US 8,886,313 B2
• Filed: 06/24/2010
• Issued: 11/11/2014
• Est. Priority Date: 07/02/2009
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Cardiac Pacemakers Incorporated (Boston Scientific Corporation)
• Original Assignee: Cardiac Pacemakers Incorporated (Boston Scientific Corporation)
• Inventors: Siejko, Krzysztof Z., Shome, Shibaji, Ding, Jiang
• Primary Examiner(s): Patel, Niketa
• Assistant Examiner(s): Flory, Christopher A
• Application Number:
  US12/822,487
• Publication Number:
  US 20110004264A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,601 Days
• Field of Search: 607/9, 607/27, 607/28, 600/509, 600/512
• US Class Current: 607/28
• CPC Class Codes: A61N 1/056 Transvascular endocardial electrode systems
• CPC Class Codes: A61N 1/36185 Selection of the electrode configuration
• CPC Class Codes: A61N 1/36514 controlled by a physiological quantity other than heart potential, e.g. blood pressure controlled by two or more physical parameters A61N1/36585
• CPC Class Codes: A61N 1/36542 controlled by body motion, e.g. acceleration
• CPC Class Codes: A61N 1/36585 controlled by two or more physical parameters
• CPC Class Codes: A61N 1/368 comprising more than one electrode co-operating with different heart regions A61N1/3622, A61N1/3627 take precedence
• CPC Class Codes: A61N 1/3686 configured for selecting the electrode configuration on a lead A61N1/3688 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: A61N 1/3704 Circuits specially adapted therefor, e.g. for sensitivity control
• CPC Class Codes: A61N 1/371 Capture, i.e. successful stimulation

Abstract

Approaches to rank potential left ventricular (LV) pacing vectors are described. Early elimination tests are performed to determine the viability of LV cathode electrodes. Some LV cathodes are eliminated from further testing based on the early elimination tests. LV cathodes identified as viable cathodes are tested further. Viable LV cathode electrodes are tested for hemodynamic efficacy. Cardiac capture and phrenic nerve activation thresholds are then measured for potential LV pacing vectors comprising a viable LV cathode electrode and an anode electrode. The potential LV pacing vectors are ranked based on one or more of the hemodynamic efficacy of the LV cathodes, the cardiac capture thresholds, and the phrenic nerve activation thresholds.

Claims

1. A method of operating a cardiac device to rank potential Left Ventricular (LV) cardiac pacing vectors, comprising:

measuring one or more parameter values indicative of pacing viability for a plurality of cathode electrodes of a cardiac chamber;

identifying each of the plurality of cathode electrodes as a viable cathode electrode or an eliminated cathode electrode based on the one or more measured parameter values for that particular cathode electrode, wherein the viable cathode electrodes are subject to further testing and the eliminated cathode electrodes are eliminated from further testing;

after identifying the viable cathode electrodes for the cardiac chamber;

measuring a value of a parameter indicating hemodynamic function of pacing for at least some of the viable cathode electrodes; and

measuring one or both of a cardiac capture threshold and a phrenic nerve activation threshold for potential LV pacing vectors of the cardiac chamber, each potential LV pacing vector defined between a viable cathode electrode and an anode electrode;

ranking the potential LV pacing vectors based on the measured hemodynamic function parameter value and the one or both measured thresholds; and

generating an output of the cardiac device indicating the ranking.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein ranking the potential LV pacing vectors comprises ranking potential LV pacing vectors in a first tier and one or more additional tiers, at least one tier ranking viable LV cathode electrodes based on the measured value of the hemodynamic function parameter and at least another tier ranking the potential LV pacing vectors based on a difference between the cardiac capture threshold and the phrenic nerve activation threshold.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein measuring the parameter values indicative of pacing viability comprises measuring one or more of an intrinsic signal amplitude and a pacing impedance.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein measuring the parameter values indicative of pacing viability comprises measuring whether cardiac capture is achieved over a limited number of pacing energies.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein measuring the values of the hemodynamic function parameter comprises measuring a cardiac electrical signal propagation delay.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein:

the viable cathode electrodes comprise viable cathode electrodes for the left ventricle; and

measuring the propagation delay comprises measuring the propagation delay between a right chamber event and detection of a left ventricular depolarization responsive to the right chamber event at the viable left ventricular cathode electrode.

7. The method of claim 1, further comprising extrapolating a parameter value, interpolating a parameter value, or eliminating measurement of a parameter value for at least some viable cathode electrodes based on their proximity to other cathode electrodes.

8. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

identifying a set of hemodynamically preferred cathode electrodes from the viable cathode electrodes based on the measured value of the hemodynamic function parameter;

delivering pacing to a heart using at least some of the viable cathode electrodes;

monitoring for phrenic nerve activation caused by the pacing; and

eliminating from further consideration each cathode electrode of the viable cathode electrodes that is associated with phrenic nerve activation and which is not included in the set of hemodynamically preferred of cathode electrodes.

9. The method of claim 1, further comprising measuring one or both of a signal amplitude and a pacing impedance for each of the potential LV pacing vectors, wherein ranking the potential LV pacing vectors further comprises ranking the potential LV pacing vectors based on one or both of the signal amplitude and the pacing impedance.

10. The method of claim 1, further comprising eliminating from further testing potential LV pacing vectors which are undesirable or not commonly used, wherein the eliminating is based on one or both of survey information and data mining information.

11. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

monitoring one or more of the potential LV pacing vectors for anodal stimulation;

storing anodal stimulation information associated with the one or more potential LV pacing vectors together with the ranking of the potential LV pacing vectors.

12. The method of claim 1, further comprising automatically changing from a first pacing vector used to deliver pacing to a second pacing vector used to deliver pacing based on the ranking.

13. The method of claim 1, further comprising eliminating a potential LV pacing vector from further testing based on a proximity of an electrode of the potential LV pacing vector to an infarct site.

14. A cardiac device for ranking potential Left Ventricular (LV) pacing vectors, comprising:

a plurality of cathode electrodes electrically coupled to a heart;

a cathode viability module configured to measure one or more parameter values for a plurality of cathode electrodes of a cardiac chamber and to identify each of the plurality of cathode electrodes as a viable cathode electrode or an eliminated cathode electrode based on the one or more measured parameter values for that particular cathode electrode, the viable cathode electrodes subject to further testing and the eliminated cathode electrodes eliminated from further testing;

a hemodynamic function module configured to measure a parameter value indicative of hemodynamic function for at least some of the viable cathode electrodes;

a threshold test module configured to measure one or both of a cardiac capture threshold and a phrenic nerve activation threshold for potential LV pacing vectors of the cardiac chamber, each potential LV pacing vector defined between a viable cathode electrode and an anode electrode;

a ranking module configured to rank at least some of the potential LV pacing vectors based on the value of the hemodynamic function parameter and the one or both of the measured capture threshold and the phrenic nerve activation threshold, and the ranking module further configured to provide an output based on the ranking.

15. The cardiac device of claim 14, wherein the ranking module is configured to identify one or more electrodes that are within an infarct region based on signal amplitudes and the capture thresholds of the identified electrodes and to eliminate from the ranking potential LV pacing vectors that use one or more electrodes near the infarct region.

16. The cardiac device of claim 14, wherein the cathode viability module, the hemodynamic function module, the threshold test module and the ranking module are disposed outside of a patient'"'"'s body in a patient-external pacing system analyzer.

17. The cardiac device of claim 16, further comprising an accelerometer configured to be attached to an external portion of the patient'"'"'s body and to sense movement indicative of phrenic nerve activation.

18. The cardiac device of claim 16, further comprising a subcutaneous electrode disposed on a lead that simulates a can electrode of a cardiac rhythm management devices.

19. The cardiac device of claim 14, wherein the cathode viability module, the hemodynamic efficacy module, the threshold test module and the ranking module are disposed within a housing of an implantable cardiac device.

20. The cardiac device of claim 14, further comprising a user interface configured to receive an input from a user, wherein ranking the potential LV pacing vectors is based at least in part on the user input.

21. The cardiac device of claim 20, wherein:

the user interface is configured to display one or both of text and graphics identifying the potential LV pacing vectors in an order that is based on the ranking and to receive an input from a user indicating a priority for parameters used to rank the potential LV pacing vectors; and

the ranking module is configured to re-rank the potential LV pacing vectors based on the ranking priority.