Method for sootblowing optimization

• US 8,924,024 B2
• Filed: 05/08/2013
• Issued: 12/30/2014
• Est. Priority Date: 06/05/2003
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: GE Digital Holdings LLC (GE Vernova, Inc.)
• Original Assignee: NeuCo Incorporated (General Electric Company)
• Inventors: Lefebvre, W. Curt, Kohn, Daniel W.
• Primary Examiner(s): Sasaki, Shogo
• Application Number:
  US13/889,419
• Publication Number:
  US 20130245831A1
• Time in Patent Office: 601 Days
• Field of Search: 700/266, 700/274, 122/379, 122/390, 122/392, 153161-3181, 422/105, 436/55
• US Class Current: 700/274
• CPC Class Codes: F22B 37/56 Boiler cleaning control devices, e.g. for ascertaining proper duration of boiler blow-down
• CPC Class Codes: F23J 3/023 cleaning the fireside of watertubes in boilers
• CPC Class Codes: F28G 1/16 using jets of fluid for removing debris F28G1/12 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: F28G 15/003 Control arrangements
• CPC Class Codes: Y10T 436/12 Condition responsive control

Abstract

A controller determines and adjusts system parameters, including cleanliness levels or sootblower operating settings, that are useful for maintaining the cleanliness of a fossil fuel boiler at an efficient level. Some embodiments use a direct controller to determine cleanliness levels and/or sootblower operating settings. Some embodiments use an indirect controller, with a system model, to determine cleanliness levels and/or sootblower settings. The controller may use a model that is, for example, a neural network, or a mass energy balance, or a genetically programmed model. The controller uses input about the actual performance or state of the boiler for adaptation. The controller may operate in conjunction with a sootblower optimization system that controls the actual settings of the sootblowers. The controller may coordinate cleanliness settings for multiple sootblowers and/or across a plurality of heat zones in the boiler.

Claims

1. A method for controlling removal of combustion deposits in a boiler using one or more sootblowers, the method comprising:

providing a performance goal to a direct controller that is implemented using a deductive method, wherein said performance goal is a desired objective for at least one of a plurality of boiler performance parameters that characterize operating performance of the boiler;

using the direct controller to determine values for said plurality of boiler performance parameters that characterize operating performance of the boiler at a current time;

using the direct controller to compare (i) the values for said plurality of boiler performance parameters that characterize the operating performance of the boiler at the current time to (ii) values for said plurality of boiler performance parameters that characterize operating performance of the boiler to achieve the performance goal;

determining a control move using the direct controller to minimize the difference between (i) the values for said plurality of boiler performance parameters that characterize operating performance of the boiler at the current time and (ii) the values for said plurality of boiler performance parameters that characterize operating performance of the boiler to achieve the performance goal,

wherein the control move determined by the direct controller includes values for sootblower operating parameters for achieving the performance goal; and

communicating the control move from the direct controller to the one or more sootblowers that direct a cleaning medium against surfaces of the boiler according to said values for the sootblower operating parameters for achieving the performance goal.

2. A method according to claim 1, wherein said deductive method uses preset control logic.

3. A method according to claim 2, wherein said preset control logic includes at least one of the following:

if-then-else statements, decision trees and lookup tables.

4. A method according to claim 3, wherein logic, structure and values for the if-then-else statements, the decision trees and the lookup tables do not change over time.

5. A method according to claim 1, wherein said deductive method uses a deductive parameter set.

6. A method according to claim 5, wherein said deductive method uses a parametric model.

7. A method according to claim 6, wherein said parametric model is a first principle model.

8. A method according to claim 1, wherein said values for the sootblower operating parameters include values for at least one of the following sootblower operating parameters:

a fluid temperature,

a fluid pressure,

a spray pattern,

a jet progression rate,

a rotational speed,

a fluid velocity, and

a media cleaning pattern.

17. A method according to claim 1, wherein said performance goal includes one of the following:

minimizing a value for heat rate,

maintaining a value for heat rate below a maximum acceptable value,

minimizing a value of one of said boiler performance parameters,

maintaining a range of values for one of said boiler performance parameters, and

maintaining a value for emission of a gas within a favorable range.

18. A method according to claim 1, wherein said plurality of boiler performance parameters include at least one of the following:

heat rate, net profit, emission of NOx, and emission of CO.

9. An apparatus for removal of combustion deposits in a boiler, the apparatus comprising:

one or more sootblowers that direct a cleaning medium against surfaces of the boiler according to values for sootblower operating parameters; and

a direct controller implemented using a deductive method and configured to;

receive a performance goal that is a desired objective for at least one of a plurality of boiler performance parameters that characterize operating performance of the boiler;

determine values for said plurality of boiler performance parameters that characterize operating performance of the boiler at a current time;

compare (i) the values for said plurality of boiler performance parameters that characterize the performance of the boiler at the current time to (ii) values for said plurality of boiler performance parameters that characterize performance of the boiler to achieve the performance goal;

determine a control move to minimize the difference between (i) the values for said plurality of boiler performance parameters that characterize operating performance of the boiler at the current time and (ii) the values for said plurality of boiler performance parameters that characterize operating performance of the boiler to achieve the performance goal, wherein said control move includes values for sootblower operating parameters for achieving the performance goal; and

output the control move to the one or more sootblowers to direct a cleaning medium against surfaces of the boiler according to values for said sootblower operating parameters for achieving the performance goal.

10. An apparatus according to claim 9, wherein said deductive method uses preset control logic.

11. An apparatus according to claim 10, wherein said preset control logic includes at least one of the following:

if-then-else statements, decision trees, and lookup tables.

12. An apparatus according to claim 11, wherein logic, structure and values for the if-then-else statements, the decision trees and the lookup tables do not change over time.

13. An apparatus according to claim 9, wherein said deductive method uses a deductive parameter set.

14. An apparatus according to claim 13, wherein said deductive method uses a parametric model.

15. An apparatus according to claim 14, wherein said parametric model is a first principle model.

16. An apparatus according to claim 9, wherein said values for the sootblower operating parameters include values for at least one of the following sootblower operating parameters:

a fluid temperature,

a fluid pressure,

a spray pattern,

a jet progression rate,

a rotation speed,

a fluid velocity, and

a media cleaning pattern.

19. An apparatus according to claim 9, wherein said performance goal includes one of the following:

minimizing a value for heat rate,

maintaining a value for heat rate below a maximum acceptable value,

minimizing a value of one of said boiler performance parameters,

maintaining a range of values for one of said boiler performance parameters, and

maintaining a value for emission of gas within a favorable range.

20. An apparatus according to claim 9, wherein said plurality of boiler performance parameters include at least one of the following:

heat rate, net profit, emission of NOx, and emission of CO.