Method for using dynamic target region for well path/drill center optimization

• US 8,931,580 B2
• Filed: 10/19/2010
• Issued: 01/13/2015
• Est. Priority Date: 02/03/2010
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company (Exxon Mobil Corporation)
• Original Assignee: Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company (Exxon Mobil Corporation)
• Inventors: Cheng, Yao-Chou, Holl, James E., Dischinger, Joseph D., Sequeira, Jose J. Jr.
• Primary Examiner(s): Stephenson, Daniel P
• Application Number:
  US13/509,524
• Publication Number:
  US 20120285701A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,547 Days
• Field of Search: 166/369, 166/254.1, 166/245, 175/45, 702/6, 702/9, 702/13, 702/14, 702/16, 703/5
• US Class Current: 175/45
• CPC Class Codes: E21B 43/30 Specific pattern of wells, e.g. optimising the spacing of wells

Abstract

Method for determining one or more optimal well trajectories and a drill center location for hydrocarbon production. A well path and drill center optimization problem (55) is solved in which one constraint is that a well trajectory must intersect a finite size target region (61) in each formation of interest, or in different parts of the same formation. The finite target size provides flexibility for the optimization problem to arrive at a more advantageous solution. Typical well path optimization constraints are also applied, such as anti-collision constraints and surface site constraints (62).

Claims

1. A method for determining drill center location and drill path for a well into a hydrocarbon formation, comprising:

selecting a target region of finite extent within the formation;

determining an initial target segment in the target region; and

solving an optimization problem wherein a drill center location and a drill path are determined subject to a plurality of constraints, one of said constraints being that the drill path has to penetrate the target region, wherein the determining an initial target segment in the target region is performed before solving the optimization problem and constraining the solution of the optimization problem to require that the drill path include the initial target segment or, if adjusted later in the optimization, a then-current target segment.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein one or more additional constraints are selected from a group consisting of reservoir quality criteria including porosity;

a minimum total measured depth;

an accumulated dogleg angle maximum;

one or more anti-collision distances; and

a limiting area for drill center location.

3. The method of claim 1, further comprising selecting at least one additional target region of finite extent located either in said hydrocarbon formation or in another hydrocarbon formation, and constraining the optimization problem to require the drill path to also penetrate each additional target region.

4. The method of claim 1, further comprising selecting at least one additional target region of finite extent located either in said hydrocarbon formation or in another hydrocarbon formation, and allowing the optimization problem to consider at least one additional well and associated drill path from the drill center subject to a constraint that each additional target region must be penetrated by a drill path.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the optimization problem uses a three-dimensional Earth model, and the target region'"'"'s location is defined in the Earth model.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the optimization problem comprises:

(a) using a well-path generation software program to generate a well path from an assumed initial drill center location and including the required target segment, then testing whether the drill path satisfies all the constraints;

(b) in response to a negative result from the test in (a), finding an alternative well path or adjusting the target segment, then testing again for whether the drill path satisfies the constraints; and

(c) in response to a negative result from the test in (b), adjusting the drill center location, and repeating (a)-(c) using the adjusted drill center location.

7. The method of claim 6, further comprising in response to a test showing a current drill path and associated drill center location satisfy the constraints, devising a cost function to measure goodness of result, then computing the cost function for the current drill path and associated drill center location, and comparing the result to a selected criterion.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the constraints are engineering or economic in nature.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein the optimization problem involves minimizing a cost function.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein the optimization problem first attempts to find an optimal drill path given an assumed drill center location, then if failing in that, adjusts the drill center location within a constrained surface area, and again attempts to find an optimal drill path, repeating until successful or until a sub-optimal drill path is found satisfying a specified criterion.

11. A method for producing hydrocarbons from a subsurface hydrocarbon formation, comprising:

(a) determining a drill path penetrating said hydrocarbon formation by;

selecting a target region of finite extent within the formation;

determining an initial target segment in the target region; and

solving an optimization problem wherein a drill center location and a drill path are determined subject to a plurality of constraints, one of said constraints being that the drill path has to penetrate the target region, wherein the determining an initial target segment in the target region is performed before solving the optimization problem and constraining the solution of the optimization problem to require that the drill path include the initial target segment or, if adjusted later in the optimization, a then-current target segment; and

(b) drilling a well following said drill path and producing hydrocarbons with the well.