Method and apparatus for laser overlap detection

• US 8,948,586 B2
• Filed: 12/15/2011
• Issued: 02/03/2015
• Est. Priority Date: 12/15/2011
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Realtek Singapore Pte Ltd. (Realtek Semiconductor Corp.)
• Original Assignee: Cortina Access, Inc. (Realtek Semiconductor Corp.)
• Inventors: Zhang, Dongsheng, Lee, Eugene W., Yao, Wei
• Primary Examiner(s): Vanderpuye, Ken
• Assistant Examiner(s): SANDHU, AMRITBIR K
• Application Number:
  US13/327,418
• Publication Number:
  US 20130156423A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,146 Days
• Field of Search: 398/68, 398/35
• US Class Current: 398/9
• CPC Class Codes: H04B 10/272 Star-type networks or tree-type networks
• CPC Class Codes: H04J 2203/006 Fault tolerance and recovery
• CPC Class Codes: H04Q 11/0067 Provisions for optical access or distribution networks, e.g. Gigabit Ethernet Passive Optical Network (GE-PON), ATM-based Passive Optical Network (A-PON), PON-Ring
• CPC Class Codes: H04Q 2011/0083 Testing; Monitoring

Abstract

There are disclosed systems and methods for detecting whether an Optical Network Unit (ONU) in a network may be causing a communications interference due to laser overlap. In one embodiment, an Optical Line Terminal (OLT) selects a pair of ONUs suspected of possibly causing laser overlap. The OLT then grants a first window to a first ONU for transmitting a first message, and grants to another ONU different from the pair of ONUs a second window for transmitting a second message. If the first message is not received by the OLT, then the OLT indicates that the first ONU may be causing laser overlap. In another embodiment, the OLT grants to an ONU a window for transmitting a message to the OLT. If the message is not received by the OLT when expected, then the OLT indicates that the ONU may be causing laser overlap. Other embodiments are disclosed.

Claims

1. A method in an Optical Line Terminal (OLT), the method comprising:

granting to a pair of Optical Network Units (ONUs) a respective time window for transmitting data to the OLT, the pair of ONUs comprising a first ONU and a second ONU, and the time window granted to the second ONU scheduled, from the perspective of the OLT, adjacent to and later than the time window granted to the first ONU;

receiving data from the first ONU that contains packet errors;

if subsequent to said granting, one or both of the pair of ONUs is either suspected by the OLT of causing communications interference due to the packet errors, known by the OLT to be causing communications interference due to the packet errors, or is assumed by the OLT to be causing communications interference due to the packet errors, then subsequent to said granting performing (a) or (b) or both (a) and (b);

wherein (a) comprises;

granting to the first ONU a first time window for transmitting a first message from the first ONU to the OLT, and granting to another ONU different from both the first ONU and the second ONU a second time window for transmitting a second message from the another ONU to the OLT, the second time window scheduled, from the perspective of the OLT, to begin at a select time later than the beginning of the first time window for the purpose of enabling communications interference detection;

if the first message is not received by the OLT, then indicating that the first ONU may be causing communications interference, and otherwise if the first message is received by the OLT then indicating that the second ONU may be causing communications interference;

and wherein (b) comprises;

granting to another ONU different from both the first ONU and the second ONU a third time window for transmitting a third message from the another ONU to the OLT, and granting to the second ONU a fourth time window for transmitting a fourth message from the second ONU to the OLT, the fourth time window scheduled, from the perspective of the OLT, to begin at a select time later than the beginning of the third time window for the purpose of enabling communications interference detection;

if the third message is not received by the OLT, then indicating that the second ONU may be causing communications interference, and otherwise if the third message is received by the OLT then indicating that the first ONU may be causing communications interference.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein:

when performing (a), the second time window is scheduled, from the perspective of the OLT, to begin adjacent to or partially overlapping the first time window and later than the scheduled transmission of the first message;

when performing (b), the fourth time window is scheduled, from the perspective of the OLT, to begin adjacent to or partially overlapping the third time window and later than the scheduled transmission of the third message.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein:

when performing (a), the second time window is scheduled, from the perspective of the OLT, to begin immediately after the scheduled transmission of the first message;

when performing (b), the fourth time window is scheduled, from the perspective of the OLT, to begin immediately after the scheduled transmission of the third message.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein the another ONU that is different from both the first ONU and the second ONU is either not suspected by the OLT of causing laser overlap, known by the OLT not to cause laser overlap, or is assumed by the OLT not to cause laser overlap.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein at least one of:

(i) the first message and the second message are both REPORT messages; and

(ii) the third message and the fourth message are both REPORT messages.

6. The method of claim 2 wherein:

(i) when performing (a), the first time window includes a laser turn-on segment, a data transmission segment, and a laser turn-off segment, and the second time window is scheduled, from the perspective of the OLT, to begin during the first time window, but no earlier than the start of the laser turn-off segment;

(ii) when performing (b), the third time window includes another laser turn-on segment, another data transmission segment, and another laser turn-off segment, and the fourth time window is scheduled, from the perspective of the OLT, to begin during the third time window, but no earlier than the start of the another laser turn-off segment.

7. The method of claim 1 wherein:

(i) when performing (a), the first message is not considered to be received by the OLT if it is not received within an expected window of arrival determined by the OLT;

(ii) when performing (b), the third message is not considered to be received by the OLT if it is not received within another expected window of arrival determined by the OLT.

8. The method of claim 1 further comprising the OLT either:

causing deregistration of an ONU suspected of causing communications interference;

or performing at least one of;

(i) reducing a duration of a transmission window granted to the ONU suspected of causing communications interference;

(ii) increasing a duration of time between an end of an earlier and adjacent transmission window granted to another ONU and a start of a transmission window granted to the ONU suspected of causing communications interference; and

(iii) increasing a duration of time between an end of a transmission window granted to the ONU suspected of causing communications interference and a start of a later and adjacent transmission window granted to another ONU.

9. The method of claim 1 wherein:

(i) when performing (a), the first message is transmitted immediately before the first ONU turns off its laser;

(ii) when performing (b), the third message is transmitted immediately before the another ONU turns off its laser.

10. The method of claim 1 wherein:

when performing (a), said indicating that the first ONU may be causing communications interference comprises indicating that the first ONU may be causing laser overlap;

when performing (b), said indicating that the second ONU may be causing communications interference comprises indicating that the second ONU may be causing laser overlap.

11. A system comprising:

a computer having a graphical display for representing at least a portion of a network, the network including an Optical Line Terminal (OLT), a pair of Optical Network Units (ONUs) comprising a first ONU and a second ONU, and another ONU different from both the first ONU and the second ONU;

the OLT being configured to grant to the pair of ONUs a respective time window for transmitting data to the OLT, the time window granted to the second ONU scheduled, from the perspective of the OLT, adjacent to and later than the time window granted to the first ONU;

the OLT further configured to receive data from the first ONU that contains packet errors;

a communication interface for communicatively connecting the computer to the OLT;

if subsequent to the OLT granting the pair of ONUs the respective time window, one or both of the pair of ONUs is either suspected by the OLT of causing communications interference due to the packet errors, known by the OLT to be causing communications interference due to the packet errors, or is assumed by the OLT to be causing communications interference due to the packet errors, then subsequent to the OLT granting the pair of ONUs the respective time window, the computer configured to instruct the OLT to perform (a) or (b) or both (a) and (b);

wherein (a) comprises;

granting to the first ONU a first time window for transmitting a first message from the first ONU to the OLT, and granting to the another ONU a second time window for transmitting a second message from the another ONU to the OLT, the second time window scheduled, from the perspective of the OLT, to begin at a select time later than the beginning of the first time window for the purpose of enabling communications interference detection; and

wherein (b) comprises;

granting to the another ONU a third time window for transmitting a third message from the another ONU to the OLT, and granting to the second ONU a fourth time window for transmitting a fourth message from the second ONU to the OLT, the fourth time window scheduled, from the perspective of the OLT, to begin at a select time later than the beginning of the third time window for the purpose of enabling communications interference detection;

the graphical display further for displaying;

(i) that the first ONU either is or may be causing communications interference if (a) is performed and the first message is not received by the OLT, and otherwise that the second ONU is or may be causing communications interference if (a) is performed and the first message is received by the OLT; and

(ii) that the second ONU either is or may be causing communications interference if (b) is performed and the third message is not received by the OLT, and otherwise that the first ONU is or may be causing communications interference if (b) is performed and the third message is received by the OLT.

12. An Optical Line Terminal (OLT) comprising:

an optical transceiver for communicating with (i) a pair of Optical Network Units (ONUs) comprising a first ONU and a second ONU, (ii) and another ONU different from both the first ONU and the second ONU;

a grant scheduler for granting time windows for transmitting messages to the OLT, the grant scheduler for granting to the pair of ONUs a respective time window, the time window granted to the second ONU scheduled, from the perspective of the OLT, adjacent to and later than the time window granted to the first ONU;

the optical transceiver for receiving data from the first ONU that contains packet errors;

a communications interference detector for controlling the OLT to perform;

if subsequent to said granting, one or both of the pair of ONUs is either suspected by the OLT of causing communications interference due to the packet errors, known by the OLT to be causing communications interference due to the packet errors, or is assumed by the OLT to be causing communications interference due to the packet errors, then subsequent to said granting performing (a) or (b) or both (a) and (b);

wherein (a) comprises;

the grant scheduler granting to the first ONU a first time window for transmitting a first message from the first ONU to the OLT, and the grant scheduler granting to the another ONU a second time window for transmitting a second message from the another ONU to the OLT, the second time window scheduled, from the perspective of the OLT, to begin at a select time later than the beginning of the first time window for the purpose of enabling communications interference detection;

if the first message is not received by the OLT, then indicating that the first ONU may be causing communications interference, and otherwise if the first message is received by the OLT then indicating that the second ONU may be causing communications interference;

and wherein (b) comprises;

the grant scheduler granting to the another ONU a third time window for transmitting a third message from the another ONU to the OLT, and the grant scheduler granting to the second ONU a fourth time window for transmitting a fourth message from the second ONU to the OLT, the fourth time window scheduled, from the perspective of the OLT, to begin at a select time later than the beginning of the third time window for the purpose of enabling communications interference detection;

if the third message is not received by the OLT, then indicating that the second ONU may be causing communications interference, and otherwise if the third message is received by the OLT then indicating that the first ONU may be causing communications interference.

13. The OLT of claim 12 wherein the another ONU is either not suspected by the OLT of causing laser overlap, known by the OLT not to cause laser overlap, or is assumed by the OLT not to cause laser overlap.

14. The OLT of claim 12 wherein:

when performing (a), the second time window is scheduled, from the perspective of the OLT, to begin adjacent to or partially overlapping the first time window and later than the scheduled transmission of the first message;

when performing (b), the fourth time window is scheduled, from the perspective of the OLT, to begin adjacent to or partially overlapping the third time window and later than the scheduled transmission of the third message.

15. The OLT of claim 12 wherein:

when performing (a), said indicating that the first ONU may be causing communications interference comprises indicating that the first ONU may be causing laser overlap;

when performing (b), said indicating that the second ONU may be causing communications interference comprises indicating that the second ONU may be causing laser overlap.

16. A non-transitory computer readable medium having stored thereon computer readable instructions for execution in one or more processing devices in an Optical Line Terminal (OLT);

the computer readable instructions comprising;

code for granting to a pair of Optical Network Units (ONUs) a respective time window for transmitting data to the OLT, the pair of ONUs comprising a first ONU and a second ONU, and the time window granted to the second ONU scheduled, from the perspective of the OLT, adjacent to and later than the time window granted to the first ONU;

receiving data from the first ONU that contains packet errors;

code for performing (a) or (b) or both (a) and (b), subsequent to said granting, if subsequent to said granting one or both of the pair of ONUs is either suspected by the OLT of causing communications interference due to the packet errors, known by the OLT to be causing communications interference due to the packet errors, or is assumed by the OLT to be causing communications interference due to the packet errors;

wherein (a) comprises;

granting to the first ONU a first time window for transmitting a first message from the first ONU to the OLT, and granting to another ONU different from both the first ONU and the second ONU a second time window for transmitting a second message from the another ONU to the OLT, the second time window scheduled, from the perspective of the OLT, to begin at a select time later than the beginning of the first time window for the purpose of enabling communications interference detection;

if the first message is not received by the OLT, then indicating that the first ONU may be causing communications interference, and otherwise if the first message is received by the OLT then indicating that the second ONU may be causing communications interference;

and wherein (b) comprises;

granting to another ONU different from both the first ONU and the second ONU a third time window for transmitting a third message from the another ONU to the OLT, and granting to the second ONU a fourth time window for transmitting a fourth message from the second ONU to the OLT, the fourth time window scheduled, from the perspective of the OLT, to begin at a select time later than the beginning of the third time window for the purpose of enabling communications interference detection;

if the third message is not received by the OLT, then indicating that the second ONU may be causing communications interference, and otherwise if the third message is received by the OLT then indicating that the first ONU may be causing communications interference.

17. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 16 wherein the non-transitory computer readable medium comprises a magnetic cassette or a magnetic tape or magnetic disk storage or an optical disk or a CD-ROM or a DVD or volatile storage memory or non-volatile storage memory or RAM or ROM or EEPROM or flash memory.