Method and computer system for evaluating the complexity of a user interface

• US 8,959,488 B2
• Filed: 12/14/2004
• Issued: 02/17/2015
• Est. Priority Date: 12/18/2003
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: SAP SE
• Original Assignee: SAP SE
• Inventors: Lauff, Markus, Ma, Jun, Spriestersbach, Axel, Ulmer, Cedric S. P., Ziegert, Thomas
• Primary Examiner(s): Dao, Thuy
• Assistant Examiner(s): HAYIM, SAMUEL E
• Application Number:
  US10/582,937
• Publication Number:
  US 20070162874A1
• Time in Patent Office: 3,717 Days
• Field of Search: None
• US Class Current: 717/125
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 8/38 for implementing user interfaces

Abstract

Method and computer system for evaluating the complexity a user interface are provided. A complexity indicator receives device class specific representations of the user interface. Each device class specific representation refers to a respective device class. The complexity indicator determines complexity values of layout components of the device class specific representations by using complexity evaluation functions associated with the layout components and aggregates the complexity values by device class according to a corresponding layout component hierarchy of the respective device class specific representation.

Claims

1. A complexity indicator having a memory for storing instructions to evaluate the complexity of a user interface that has device class specific representations, each device class specific representation referring to a respective device class and having a respective layout component hierarchy;

the complexity indicator comprising;

a library having complexity evaluation functions to determine complexity values of layout components of the respective layout component hierarchies, each combination of a layout component and the respective device class having a distinct complexity evaluation function, the complexity values are numerical complexity values;

a processor configured by the complexity indicator to apply the distinct complexity evaluation function retrieved from the library to the layout component for the respective device class for each combination of the layout component and the respective device class to generate a numerical complexity value for the combination;

an aggregator to aggregate the numerical complexity values generated from application of the distinct complexity evaluation function retrieved from the library to the layout component for the respective device class for each combination of the layout component and the respective device class of the corresponding layout component hierarchy of the respective device class specific representation into a single aggregated numerical complexity value for each device class, the layout component hierarchy comprising a parent node and child nodes, the aggregator to aggregate by propagating a highest numerical complexity value of the child nodes to the parent node; and

a complexity display to visually present the single aggregated numerical complexity value for each device class of the respective layout component hierarchies.

2. The complexity indicator of claim 1, further comprising:

a transformer to transform the layout component hierarchy of each representation into a corresponding complexity evaluation hierarchy so that the association of each evaluation function with its respective layout component is redirected through the corresponding component of the respective complexity evaluation hierarchy and the evaluation function is applied to the corresponding component of the respective complexity evaluation hierarchy.

3. The complexity indicator of claim 1, wherein the complexity display has a drill down portion to visualize complexity values of layout components related to a selected device class.

4. The complexity indicator of claim 3 in combination with a tree-based outline editor to generate an outline view of the representation that corresponds to the selected device class configured to highlight a layout component that is selected in the complexity display for drill down purposes.

10. The complexity indicator of claim 1, wherein the aggregator is to overrule the propagated highest numerical complexity value of the child nodes with a higher numerical complexity value calculated for the parent node.

11. The complexity indicator of claim 1, wherein the complexity display is to visually present the aggregated numerical complexity value using a graphical bar.

14. The complexity indicator of claim 1, wherein the layout component hierarchies are derived from a user interface document for each device class.

5. A method for complexity evaluation of a user interface, the method comprising:

receiving device class specific representations of the user interface, each device class specific representation referring to a respective device class;

determining numerical complexity values of layout components of the device class specific representations by applying complexity evaluation functions retrieved from a library having complexity evaluation functions used to determine complexity values of layout components of the respective layout component hierarchies, each combination of a layout component and the respective device class having a distinct complexity evaluation function, the distinct complexity evaluation function retrieved from the library being applied to the layout component for the respective device class for each combination of the layout component and the respective device class to generate the numerical complexity value for the combination;

aggregating, using one or more processors, the numerical complexity values generated from application of the distinct complexity evaluation function retrieved from the library of complexity evaluation functions to the layout component for the respective device class for each combination of the layout component and the respective device class of a corresponding layout component hierarchy of the respective device class specific representation into a single aggregated numerical complexity value for each device class, the layout component hierarchy comprising a parent node and child nodes, the aggregating comprising propagating a highest numerical complexity value of the child nodes to the parent node; and

visually presenting the single aggregated numerical complexity value for each device class of the respective layout component hierarchies.

6. The method of claim 5, further comprising:

transforming the layout component hierarchy of each representation into a corresponding complexity evaluation hierarchy so that the association of each evaluation function with its respective layout component is redirected through the corresponding component of the respective complexity evaluation hierarchy and the evaluation function is applied to the corresponding component of the respective complexity evaluation hierarchy.

7. The method of claim 5, wherein the visually presenting comprises:

visualizing complexity values of layout components related to a selected device class in a drill down portion.

12. The method of claim 5, further comprising overruling the propagated highest numerical complexity values of the child nodes with a higher numerical complexity value calculated for the parent node.

13. The method of claim 5, wherein the visually presenting comprises presenting the aggregated numerical complexity value using a graphical bar.

8. A computer system having at least one computing device configured to run an integrated development environment that includes a complexity indicator, the complexity indicator comprising:

a library having complexity evaluation functions to determine complexity values of layout components of the respective layout component hierarchies, each combination of a layout component and a device class having a distinct complexity evaluation function, the complexity values are numerical complexity values;

a processor configured by the complexity indicator to apply the distinct complexity evaluation function retrieved from the library to the layout component for the respective device class for each combination of the layout component and the respective device class to generate a numerical complexity value for the combination;

an aggregator to aggregate the numerical complexity values generated from application of the distinct complexity evaluation function retrieved from the library to the layout component for the respective device class for each combination of the layout component and the respective device class of the corresponding layout component hierarchy of the respective device class specific representation into a single aggregated numerical complexity value for each device class, the layout component hierarchy comprising a parent node and child nodes, the aggregator to aggregate by propagating a highest numerical complexity value of the child nodes to the parent node; and

a complexity display to visually present the single aggregated numerical complexity value for each device class of the respective layout component hierarchies.

15. The computer system of claim 8, wherein the aggregator is to overrule the propagated highest numerical complexity value of the child nodes with a higher numerical complexity value calculated for the parent node.

9. A non-transitory machine-readable storage medium storing instructions which when executed by at least one processor of a machine, cause the machine to perform operations comprising:

receiving device class specific representations of the user interface, each device class specific representation referring to a respective device class;

determining numerical complexity values of layout components of the device class specific representations by applying complexity evaluation functions retrieved from a library having complexity evaluation functions used to determine complexity values of layout components of the respective layout component hierarchies, each combination of a layout component and the respective device class having a distinct complexity evaluation function;

aggregating, using one or more processors, the numerical complexity values generated from application of corresponding complexity evaluation functions from the library of complexity evaluation functions for each combination of the layout component and the respective device class of a corresponding layout component hierarchy of the respective device class specific representation into a single aggregated numerical complexity value for each device class, the layout hierarchy comprising a parent node and child nodes, the aggregating comprising propagating a highest numerical complexity value of the child nodes to the parent node; and

visually presenting the single aggregated numerical complexity value for each device class of the respective layout component hierarchies.

16. The non-transitory machine-readable storage medium of claim 9, wherein the operations further comprise overruling the propagated highest numerical complexity value of the child nodes with a higher numerical complexity value calculated for the parent node.