Methods and systems for intelligent visual function assessments

• US 8,967,809 B2
• Filed: 12/01/2011
• Issued: 03/03/2015
• Est. Priority Date: 03/01/2010
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Alcon Incorporated, Eyecheck Systems, LLC
• Original Assignee: Alcon Research Limited (Nestle SA)
• Inventors: Kirschen, David Gary, Laby, Daniel Moses
• Primary Examiner(s): Hasan, Mohammed
• Assistant Examiner(s): Choudhury, Mustak
• Application Number:
  US13/308,951
• Publication Number:
  US 20120075586A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,188 Days
• Field of Search: 351/239, 351/246
• US Class Current: 351/239
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 3/028 for testing visual acuity; for determination of refraction, e.g. phoropters
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 3/032 Devices for presenting test symbols or characters, e.g. test chart projectors A61B3/036 takes precedence

Abstract

A system and method of testing vision performance includes displaying a visual recognition test to a subject and receiving from the subject a response to the visual recognition test. After receiving the response to the visual recognition test, a subsequent visual recognition test is selected based on the response received from the subject, the subsequent visual recognition test is displayed, and a response is received from the subject. The subsequent visual recognition tests are repeated until a predetermined criterion is reached. A vision performance score is determined based on the visual recognition tests displayed and the set of responses received from the subject and output from the system.

Claims

1. A vision testing system, comprising:

a memory storing a plurality of parameter files defining a plurality of visual recognition tests;

a display operable to display an image for each of the visual recognition tests to a subject;

an input device operable to receive a response to each of the visual recognition tests from the subject;

a calibration sensor positioned in view of the display and configured to continually monitor one or more parameters of the display during the visual recognition tests;

a processor operable to execute stored instructions to cause the following steps to be performed;

(a) display a visual recognition test from the parameter files to a subject;

(b) receive from the subject a response to the visual recognition test;

(c) select a subsequent visual recognition test from the parameter files based on the response from the subject;

(d) adjust at least one of the parameters of the display in response to at least one of the selection of the subsequent visual recognition test and at least one of the parameters of the display being outside of an operating range as indicated by the calibration sensor;

(e) display the subsequent visual recognition test;

(f) receive from the subject a response to the subsequent visual recognition test;

(g) repeat steps (c), (e), and (f) until a criterion is achieved; and

(h) output a vision performance score determined based on the set of responses received from the subject.

2. The vision testing system of claim 1, wherein the parameter files or a subset thereof can be linked to form a vision testing sequence.

3. The vision testing system of claim 2, wherein a test supervisor is able to any of create, modify, delete, apply, link, and order the plurality of parameter files used to form the vision testing sequence.

4. The vision testing system of claim 2, wherein the parameter file is automatically created by the processor prior to displaying a visual recognition test to the subject.

5. The vision testing system of claim 4, wherein the processor selects the visual recognition tests to display to a user randomly or pseudo-randomly.

6. The vision testing system of claim 4, wherein any images corresponding to the visual recognition tests specified in the parameter file are automatically created by the processor prior to displaying a first visual recognition test to the subject.

7. The vision testing system of claim 1, wherein the order of visual recognition tests is updated dynamically during testing based on responses received from the subject.

8. The vision testing system of claim 1, further comprising a second display operable to display a control panel including information regarding the visual recognition test displayed to the subject.

9. The vision testing system of claim 8, wherein the second display includes a graphical user interface (GUI) configured to allow a test supervisor to any of monitor and control the visual recognition test.

10. The vision testing system of claim 9, wherein the GUI allows the test supervisor to any of create, modify, delete, and apply parameter files using drag-and-drop operations.

11. The vision testing system of claim 1, wherein the calibration sensor is further configured to monitor ambient lighting of the testing environment.

12. The vision testing system of claim 11, wherein the one or more parameters monitored by the calibration sensor include any of display contrast, display color, display luminance, display resolution, display brightness, and ambient illumination.

13. The vision testing system of claim 11, wherein the vision testing system is further configured to automatically adjust the one or more parameters of the display to maintain the one or more parameters within the operating range.

14. The vision testing system of claim 11, wherein the operating range is represented by a target parameter value and an acceptable percentage variation from the target parameter value.

15. The vision testing system of claim 1, wherein the processor is further configured to adjust the visual recognition test on the display to account for a distance of the test subject from the display.

16. The vision testing system of claim 15, wherein the distances is between about 2 meters and about 9 meters.

17. The vision testing system of claim 1, wherein the system further comprises a camera for monitoring the subject during testing.

18. The vision testing system of claim 17, wherein the system further comprises an illumination source.

19. The vision testing system of claim 18, wherein the illumination source further comprises a source on non-visible light.

20. The vision testing system of claim 17, wherein the camera is a video camera.

21. The vision testing system of claim 1, wherein the processor is further configured to adjust the contrast of each visual recognition test by any of:

fading a background color to match a foreground color;

fading the foreground color to match the background color; and

fading both the foreground and the background colors to converge at a neutral color.

22. The vision testing system of claim 1, wherein the processor is further configured to output a vision performance score according to a 100th (0.01) of a logMAR.

23. The vision testing system of claim 1, wherein the processor is further configured to test a plurality of vision parameters using a single visual recognition test by any of introducing and varying any of size, contrast, presentation time, movement, distracters, glare, color, crowding, retinal adaptation level, eccentricity, time to blink, and reaction time when displaying the visual recognition test to the subject.

24. The vision testing system of claim 1, wherein the input device comprises a button box including one or more buttons indicative of target orientations presented on the display.

25. The vision testing system of claim 1, wherein the processor is further configured to, prior to performing steps (a)-(g), administer an orientation test utilizing the display and input device.

26. The vision testing system of claim 1, wherein the processor is further configured to analyze responses received from the subject and compare those responses to responses received from previous subjects to recognize a visual performance pattern.

27. The vision testing system of claim 26, wherein the processor is further configured to create and output a three-dimensional representation of the visual performance of the subject.

28. The vision testing system of claim 26, wherein the processor is connected to additional memories via direct or networked connections such that the processor can exchange responses received from the subject with other data.

29. A method of testing vision performance, comprising:

selecting a first visual recognition test from a memory storing a plurality of parameter files;

displaying an image to a subject;

monitoring one or more parameters of the display during the visual recognition tests with a calibration sensor;

varying one or more characteristics of the image to more accurately assess the visual performance of the subject;

receiving a response from the subject via an input device;

selecting a subsequent visual recognition test from the memory based on the response of the subject;

adjusting at least one of the parameters of the display in response to at least one of the selection of the subsequent visual recognition test and at least one of the parameters of the display being outside of an operating range as indicated by the calibration sensor;

repeating the steps of varying the one or more characteristics of the image, receiving the response from the subject, and selecting the subsequent visual recognition test from the memory until a criterion is achieved; and

outputting a vision performance score determined based on the set of responses received from the subject.

30. The method of claim 29, wherein the one or more characteristics of the image varied include any of size of targets in the image, contrast of the image, presentation time, movement of targets in the image, the presence, number, and spacing of distractor elements in the image, glare on the image, color of the image, and location of targets in the image.

31. The method of claim 29, wherein a visual recognition test is selected to measure particular vision performance criteria including any of retinal adaptation level, time to blink, and reaction time.

32. The method of claim 29, wherein outputting a vision performance score comprises displaying a three-dimensional representation of the vision performance of the subject.

33. The method of claim 29, wherein the method further comprises using a fixation mechanism to aid in subject attentiveness.