Active safety control for vehicles

• US 9,014,915 B2
• Filed: 07/25/2011
• Issued: 04/21/2015
• Est. Priority Date: 07/25/2011
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: GM Global Technology Operations LLC (General Motors Company)
• Original Assignee: GM Global Technology Operations LLC (General Motors Company)
• Inventors: Chatterjee, Aamrapali, Zagorski, Chad T., Williams, Paul R.
• Primary Examiner(s): Black, Thomas G
• Assistant Examiner(s): LI, CE LI
• Application Number:
  US13/190,379
• Publication Number:
  US 20130030657A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,366 Days
• Field of Search: 701/1, 701/41, 701/44, 701/93, 701/96, 701/98, 701/301, 701 46- 48, 340/576, 340/903
• US Class Current: 701/41
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2050/0075 Automatic parameter input, automatic initialising or calibrating means
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2556/10 Historical data
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 30/00 Purposes of road vehicle drive control systems not related to the control of a particular sub-unit, e.g. of systems using conjoint control of vehicle sub-units
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 30/08 Active safety systems predicting or avoiding probable or impending collision or attempting to minimise its consequences
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 30/085 Taking automatic action to adjust vehicle attitude in preparation for collision, e.g. braking for nose dropping
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 30/095 Predicting travel path or likelihood of collision
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 30/12 Lane keeping
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 30/14 Adaptive cruise control
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 30/16 Control of distance between vehicles, e.g. keeping a distance to preceding vehicle
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 40/00 Estimation or calculation of non-directly measurable driving parameters for road vehicle drive control systems not related to the control of a particular sub unit, e.g. by using mathematical models
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 40/09 Driving style or behaviour
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 50/08 Interaction between the driver and the control system
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 50/14 Means for informing the driver, warning the driver or prompting a driver intervention

Abstract

Methods, systems, and vehicles are provided for controlling active safety functionality for a vehicle. The active safety functionality provides an action during a drive cycle of the vehicle based on a predetermined threshold. Data pertaining to driving conditions, usage conditions of the vehicle, or both, is obtained for a drive cycle of the vehicle. A risk factor grade is calculated using the data. The risk factor grade corresponds to a level of situational risk for the drive cycle. The predetermined threshold of the active safety system is adjusted based on the risk factor grade.

Claims

1. A method for controlling active safety functionality for a vehicle, the active safety functionality providing an action during a drive cycle of the vehicle based on a predetermined threshold, the method comprising the steps of:

obtaining data pertaining to driving conditions for a road on which the vehicle is travelling and usage conditions of the vehicle for the drive cycle;

calculating a risk factor grade using the data, the risk factor grade corresponding to a level of situational risk for the drive cycle via a processor based on both the driving conditions of the road and the usage conditions of the vehicle; and

adjusting the predetermined threshold of the active safety functionality based on the risk factor grade, wherein;

the step of calculating the risk factor grade comprises the steps of;

calculating a first value of the risk factor grade at a first time during the drive cycle; and

calculating a second value of the risk factor grade at a second time during the drive cycle, the second time being subsequent to the first time; and

the step of adjusting the predetermined threshold comprises the steps of;

adjusting the predetermined threshold based on the second value of the risk factor grade if the second value of the risk factor grade is greater than the first value of the risk factor grade; and

adjusting the predetermined threshold based on an average of the first value of the risk factor grade and the second value of the risk factor grade if the second value of the risk factor grade is less than the first value of the risk factor grade.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the vehicle has a driver, and the method further comprises the step of:

obtaining prior data pertaining to a driving behavior of the driver during a prior driving cycle;

wherein;

the step of obtaining the data comprises the step of obtaining the data pertaining to the driving behavior of the driver during a current driving cycle; and

the step of calculating the risk factor grade comprises the step of calculating the risk factor grade based at least in part on a comparison between the driving behavior during the current driving cycle and the driving behavior during the prior driving cycle.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the active safety functionality is selected from the group consisting of:

a forward collision alert (FCA) system, a collision preparation system (CPS), an enhanced collision avoidance (ECA) system, a lane departure warning (LDW) system, a lane keeping assistance (LKA) system, a lane change assistance (LCA) system, an adaptive cruise control system (ACC), a full-speed range adaptive cruise control system (FSRACC), and a freeway limited ability autonomous driving (FLAAD) system.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the predetermined threshold comprises a predetermined distance threshold, a predetermined time threshold, or both, and the step of adjusting the predetermined threshold comprises the step of:

adjusting the predetermined distance threshold, the predetermined time threshold, or both, based on the risk factor grade.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the risk factor grade is calculated based at least in part upon a driver'"'"'s engagement of a brake pedal of the vehicle.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the risk factor grade is calculated based at least in part upon a driver'"'"'s engagement of an accelerator pedal of the vehicle.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the risk factor grade is calculated based at least in part upon a driver'"'"'s engagement of a radio control of the vehicle.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the risk factor grade is calculated based at least in part upon whether a driver of the vehicle is using a telephone.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein the driving conditions comprise a weather condition for the road on which the vehicle is travelling.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein the driving conditions comprise a coefficient of friction for the road on which the vehicle is travelling.

11. A system for controlling active safety functionality for a vehicle, the active safety functionality providing an action during a current drive cycle of the vehicle based on a predetermined threshold, the system comprising:

a memory configured to store the predetermined threshold; and

a processor coupled to the memory and configured to;

obtain data pertaining to;

a driving behavior of a driver of the vehicle during a prior driving cycle of the vehicle, the prior driving cycle occurring prior to the current drive cycle; and

the driving behavior of the driver during the current driving cycle;

calculate a risk factor grade using the data, the risk factor grade corresponding to a level of situational risk for the drive cycle, the risk factor grade calculated based at least in part on a comparison between the driving behavior during the prior driving cycle and the driving behavior during the current driving cycle; and

adjust the predetermined threshold of the active safety functionality based on the risk factor grade,

wherein the processor is further configured to;

calculate a first value of the risk factor grade at a first time during the drive cycle;

calculate a second value of the risk factor grade at a second time during the drive cycle, the second time being subsequent to the first time;

adjust the predetermined threshold based on the second value of the risk factor grade if the second value of the risk factor grade is greater than the first value of the risk factor grade; and

adjust the predetermined threshold based on an average of the first value of the risk factor grade and the second value of the risk factor grade if the second value of the risk factor grade is less than the first value of the risk factor grade.

12. The system of claim 11, wherein the processor is further configured to calculate the risk factor grade as a measure of responsiveness of the driver.

13. The system of claim 11, wherein the processor is further configured to calculate the risk factor grade as a measure of alertness of the driver.

14. The system of claim 11, wherein the processor is configured to calculate the risk factor grade based on a comparison of the driver'"'"'s engagement of one or more of a brake pedal of the vehicle, an accelerator pedal of the vehicle, or a radio control of the vehicle during the prior driving cycle versus engagement of the one or more of the brake pedal of the vehicle, the accelerator pedal of the vehicle, or the radio control of the vehicle during the current driving cycle.

15. A vehicle comprising:

a drive system;

an active safety system coupled to the drive system and configured to provide an action during a drive cycle of the vehicle based on a predetermined threshold; and

a controller coupled to the active safety system and configured to;

obtain data pertaining to driving conditions, usage conditions of the vehicle , or both, for the drive cycle;

calculate a first risk factor grade using the data at a first time during the drive cycle, the first risk factor grade corresponding to a level of situational risk at the first time during the drive cycle; and

calculate a second value of the risk factor grade at a second time during the drive cycle, the second time being subsequent to the first time, the second risk factor grade corresponding to the level of situational risk at the second time during the drive cycle;

adjust the predetermined threshold of the active safety system based on the second value of the risk factor grade if the second value of the risk factor grade is greater than the first value of the risk factor grade; and

adjust the predetermined threshold based on an average of the first value of the risk factor grade and the second value of the risk factor grade if the second value of the risk factor grade is less than the first value of the risk factor grade.

16. The vehicle of claim 15, wherein the controller is further configured to calculate the first and second values of the risk factor grade as a measure of responsiveness of the driver at the first time and the second time, respectively.

17. The vehicle of claim 15, wherein the controller is further configured to calculate the first and second values of the risk factor grade as a measure of alertness of the driver at the first time and the second time, respectively.

18. The vehicle of claim 15, wherein the average comprise an arithmetic mean of the first value of the risk factor grade and the second value of the risk factor grade.