Method and tool for aided aircraft design using a criterion of operational availability

• US 9,015,017 B2
• Filed: 03/01/2011
• Issued: 04/21/2015
• Est. Priority Date: 03/04/2010
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Airbus Operations (European Aeronautic Defence and Space Company EADS NV)
• Original Assignee: Airbus Operations SAS (Airbus SE)
• Inventors: Maurin, Thomas
• Primary Examiner(s): Saxena, Akash
• Application Number:
  US13/037,860
• Publication Number:
  US 20110218783A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,512 Days
• Field of Search: 703/1, 703/2, 703/8
• US Class Current: 703/8
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 2111/20 Configuration CAD, e.g. designing by assembling or positioning modules selected from libraries of predesigned modules
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 30/15 Vehicle, aircraft or watercraft design
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/06 Buying, selling or leasing transactions

Abstract

A method for the computer-aided design of an aeronautic system forming all or part of an aircraft, using a criterion of maintenance time cost over a given period of use. The cost is computed as the weighted sum of a first component representing the mean flight time lost during this period, a second component representing the mean unscheduled maintenance time for this system during said period, and a third component representing the scheduled maintenance time for this system throughout said period. The configuration corresponding to the lowest time cost is then selected.

Claims

1. A computer-aided method implemented by a computer for designing an aeronautic system forming all or part of an aircraft, the computer-aided method comprising:

extracting a plurality of different configurations of the system from a database;

estimating by the computer, for each of the plurality of different configurations, a maintenance time cost of said system for a given period of use, the estimating including

computing a first component equal to a mean flight time lost by the aircraft subsequent to a system failure during said period of use,

computing a second component equal to a mean unscheduled maintenance time subsequent to a system failure during said period of use,

computing a third component equal to a scheduled maintenance time for this the system throughout said period of use, and

obtaining said time cost as a weighted sum of the first, second, and third components by a first cost factor, a second cost factor, and a third cost factor respectively;

generating by the computer, based on the estimating, a graphical interface representing the maintenance time cost of at least one configuration of the system, the graphical interface representing the first component as a first part of a bar and representing a worst case situation for the first component, which corresponds to a maximum flight time lost subsequent to a system failure preventing the aircraft from flying, as a second part of the bar, the first part of the bar being distinguished from the second part of the bar; and

selecting the configuration of the system having a lowest maintenance time cost.

2. The computer-aided design method according to claim 1, wherein the computing of the first component is computed from a probability that the system will be affected during said period of use by a failure preventing the aircraft from flying, from a mean diversion time of the aircraft, and from a mean time for verification/repair of the system on the ground.

3. The computer-aided design method according to claim 1, wherein the computing of the second component is computed from a probability that the system will be affected, during said period of use, by a failure which, although does not prevent the aircraft from flying, requires an unscheduled maintenance operation, and on a mean duration of the unscheduled maintenance operation.

4. The computer-aided design method according to claim 1, wherein the computing of the third component is computed from a number of scheduled maintenance operations for the system throughout said period of use, and from a mean duration of the scheduled maintenance operations.

5. The computer-aided design method according to claim 1, wherein the first cost factor is higher than the second cost factor, which is higher than the third cost factor.

6. The computer-aided design method according to claim 1, wherein the graphical interface represents each of the second and third components by a bar of length proportional to their weighted value, the bars for the different components being concatenated to highlight said time cost of maintenance.

7. The computer-aided design method according to claim 6, wherein said system includes a plurality of equipment items, and at least one bar associated with one component is fractionated into blocks so as to represent the respective contributions made by at least one of the different items of equipment and different types of failure to the component.

8. The computer-aided design method according to claim 6 or 7, wherein the graphical interface represents, for each of the second component and the third component, a worst case situation, a representation of the worst case situation for the second component corresponds to a maximum unscheduled maintenance time for a failure not preventing the aircraft from flying, and a representation of the worst case situation for the third component corresponds to a scheduled maintenance time for the system throughout said period of use increased by a risk margin.

9. The computer-aided design method according to claim 1, wherein said period of use is the lifetime of the aircraft.

10. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium including computer executable instructions, wherein the instructions, when executed by a computer, cause the computer to perform a method for designing an aeronautic system forming all or part of an aircraft, the method comprising:

extracting a plurality of different configurations of the system from a database;

estimating, for each of the plurality of different configurations, a maintenance time cost of the system for a given period of use, the estimating including

computing a first component equal to a mean flight time lost by the aircraft subsequent to a system failure during the period of use,

computing a second component equal to a mean unscheduled maintenance time subsequent to a system failure during the period of use,

computing a third component equal to the scheduled maintenance time for the system throughout the period of use,

obtaining the time cost as a weighted sum of the first, second, and third components by a first cost factor, a second cost factor, and a third cost factor respectively;

generating, based on the estimating, a graphical interface representing the maintenance time cost of at least one configuration of the system, the graphical interface representing the first component as a first part of a bar and representing a worst case situation for the first component, which corresponds to a maximum flight time lost subsequent to a system failure preventing the aircraft from flying, as a second part of the bar, the first part of the bar being distinguished from the second part of the bar; and

selecting the configuration of the system having a lowest maintenance time cost.