Command based method for allocating fluid flow from a plurality of pumps to multiple hydraulic functions

• US 9,032,724 B2
• Filed: 06/13/2011
• Issued: 05/19/2015
• Est. Priority Date: 06/21/2010
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Husco International Incorporated
• Original Assignee: Husco International Incorporated
• Inventors: Pfaff, Joseph L., Hamkins, Eric P., Quinnell, Corey K.
• Primary Examiner(s): White, Dwayne J
• Assistant Examiner(s): KRAFT, LOGAN M
• Application Number:
  US13/158,631
• Publication Number:
  US 20110308242A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,436 Days
• Field of Search: 603/27, 604/20, 604/21, 604/22, 604/25, 604/26, 604/28, 604/29, 604/30, 604/31, 604/59, 604/71
• US Class Current: 60/428
• CPC Class Codes: E02F 9/2242 including an electronic controller
• CPC Class Codes: E02F 9/2292 Systems with two or more pumps
• CPC Class Codes: E02F 9/2296 Systems with a variable displacement pump
• CPC Class Codes: F15B 11/17 using two or more pumps
• CPC Class Codes: F15B 2211/20523 Internal combustion engine
• CPC Class Codes: F15B 2211/20546 variable capacity
• CPC Class Codes: F15B 2211/20576 with multiple pumps
• CPC Class Codes: F15B 2211/265 Control of multiple pressure sources
• CPC Class Codes: F15B 2211/30575 in a Wheatstone Bridge arrangement (also half bridges)
• CPC Class Codes: F15B 2211/6306 representing a pressure
• CPC Class Codes: F15B 2211/6309 the pressure being a pressure source supply pressure
• CPC Class Codes: F15B 2211/6313 the pressure being a load pressure
• CPC Class Codes: F15B 2211/6346 representing a state of input means, e.g. joystick position

Abstract

Fluid from two pumps is allocated to a plurality of hydraulic actuators based on a plurality of flow commands, each specifying a desired amount of flow to be applied to a different hydraulic actuator. For a given hydraulic actuator, the allocation involves (1) determining an apportionment of the desired amount of flow, if no other hydraulic actuator is active, and (2) altering the apportionment in response to all the plurality of flow commands, and (3) using the altered apportionment to determine a first amount of the flow for one pump to provide and a second amount of the flow for the other pump to provide. The process is repeated for all the hydraulic actuators. Supply valves for each hydraulic actuator are controlled by the associated first and second amounts and each pump is controlled in response to either the first or second amounts for all the hydraulic actuators.

Claims

1. A method for allocating flow of fluid from first and second pumps to a plurality of hydraulic actuators, said method comprising steps of:

(a) producing a plurality of flow commands, each of which specifies an amount of flow desired to be applied to a different one of the plurality of hydraulic actuators;

(b) calculating an allocation pump bias for each of the plurality of hydraulic actuators, the allocation pump bias being calculated using a flow allocation gain for each of the plurality of hydraulic actuators;

(c) for a given one of the plurality of hydraulic actuators;

(1) using the allocation pump bias to determine a first portion of the amount of flow specified by the flow command for the given hydraulic actuator which is to be provided by the first pump and to determine a second portion of the amount of flow specified by the flow command for the given hydraulic actuator which is to be provided by the second pump,

(2) deriving a first flow level in response to the first portion and the flow command for the given hydraulic actuator, and

(3) deriving a second flow level in response to the second portion and the flow command for the given hydraulic actuator;

(d) determining a maximum power level for a prime mover that drives the first and second pumps;

(e) defining a power limit flow function using at least a fluid flow level producible by the first pump and a fluid flow level producible by the second pump;

(f) determining if the plurality of flow commands exceeds the power limit flow function;

(g) operating the first pump in response to the first flow level; and

(h) operating the second pump in response to the second flow level.

2. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein deriving the first flow level comprises multiplying the flow command for the given hydraulic actuator by the first portion;

and deriving the second flow level comprises multiplying the flow command for the given hydraulic actuator by the second portion.

3. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein step (c) further comprises operating one valve in response to the first flow level to supply fluid from the first pump to the given one of the plurality of hydraulic actuators, and operating another valve in response to the second flow level to supply fluid from the second pump to the given one of the plurality of hydraulic actuators.

4. The method as recited in claim 1 further comprising repeating step (c) for each of the plurality of hydraulic actuators;

and wherein the first pump is operated in response to all the first flow levels of all the plurality of hydraulic actuators and the second pump is operated in response to all the second flow levels of all the plurality of hydraulic actuators.

5. The method as recited in claim 4 wherein the first pump is operated in response to a first pump flow command produced by summing all the first flow levels, and the second pump is operated in response to a second pump flow command produced by summing all the second flow levels.

6. The method as recited in claim 1 further comprising:

determining a maximum flow level that can be produced by the first and second pumps being driven by the prime mover operating at the maximum power level; and

in response to the first flow level and the second flow level for all of the plurality of hydraulic actuators, determining a first aggregate flow level required to be produced by the first pump and determining a second aggregate flow level required to be produced by the second pump.

7. The method as recited in claim 1 further comprising, when the plurality of flow commands exceeds the power limit flow function, altering a calculation of at least one of the flow commands so that the plurality of flow commands is not greater than the power limit flow function.

8. The method as recited in claim 1 further comprising producing a first pump pressure setpoint for the first pump in response to load forces acting on each of the plurality of hydraulic actuators;

and producing a second pump pressure setpoint for the second pump in response to load forces acting on each of the plurality of hydraulic actuators.

9. The method as recited in claim 1 further comprising:

in step (c) producing a first Function Pressure Setpoint for the first pump in response to the first portion and a load force acting on the given hydraulic actuator, and producing a second Function Pressure Setpoint for the second pump in response to the second portion and the load force;

repeating step (c) for each of the plurality of hydraulic actuators;

producing a first Pump Pressure Setpoint for the first pump in response to the first Function Pressure Setpoints for the plurality of hydraulic actuators; and

producing a second Pump Pressure Setpoint for the second pump in response to the second Function Pressure Setpoints for the plurality of hydraulic actuators.

10. The method as recited in claim 9 wherein producing the first Pump Pressure Setpoint includes determining the greatest Function Pressure Setpoint for the first pump among the plurality of hydraulic actuators;

and

producing the second Pump Pressure Setpoint includes determining the greatest Function Pressure Setpoint for the second pump among the plurality of hydraulic actuators.

11. The method as recited in claim 1 further comprising when the plurality of flow commands exceeds the power flow limit function, calculating a weighted power command for each of the plurality of hydraulic actuators;

summing the weighted power command for each of the plurality of hydraulic actuators for the first pump;

summing the weighted power command for each of the plurality of hydraulic actuators for the second pump;

deriving a first pump relative power allocation and a second pump relative power allocation; and

apportioning the maximum power level between the first pump and the second pump based on at least the first pump relative power allocation and the second pump relative power allocation.

12. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein the fluid flow level producible by the first pump defines a first pump axis intercept point and the fluid flow level producible by the second pump defines a second pump axis intercept point, the first pump axis intercept point and the second pump axis intersect point defining the power limit flow function.

13. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein the flow allocation gain is a numerical term with a sign and a magnitude, the sign establishing a flow allocation direction toward either the first pump or the second pump, and the magnitude establishes an amount of movement toward either the first pump or the second pump.

14. A method for allocating flow of fluid from first and second pumps to a plurality of hydraulic actuators, said method comprising steps of:

(a) producing a plurality of flow commands, each of which specifies an amount of flow desired to be applied to a different one of the plurality of hydraulic actuators;

(b) determining a portion of an aggregate maximum flow output of both the first and second pumps that is required to satisfy the amount of flow specified by the flow command for each of the plurality of hydraulic actuators;

(c) in response to the proportion of the aggregate maximum flow output, calculating an allocation pump bias for each of the plurality of hydraulic actuators, the allocation pump bias being calculated using a flow allocation gain for each of the plurality of hydraulic actuators;

(d) for a given one the plurality of hydraulic actuators;

(1) using the proportion of the aggregate maximum flow output to determine a first portion of the amount of flow specified by the flow command for the given hydraulic actuator which is to be provided by the first pump and a second portion of the amount of flow specified by the flow command for the given hydraulic actuator which is to be provided by the second pump,

(2) altering the first portion and the second portion in response to the plurality flow commands, thereby producing an altered first portion and an altered second portion for the given hydraulic actuator,

(3) deriving a first flow level in response to the altered first portion and the flow command for the given hydraulic actuator, and deriving a second flow level in response to the altered second portion and the flow command for the given hydraulic actuator;

(e) repeating step (d) for each of the plurality of hydraulic actuators;

(f) defining a power limit flow function using at least a maximum flow level producible by the first pump and a maximum flow level producible by the second pump; and

(g) determining if an aggregate of flow commands exceeds the power limit flow function.

15. The method as recited in claim 14 wherein altering the first portion and the second portion for a given hydraulic actuator comprises altering the first portion by weighted versions of the flow commands for the other hydraulic actuators, and altering the second portion by the weighted versions of the flow commands for the other hydraulic actuators, wherein each flow command for the other hydraulic actuators is weighted based on an amount of influence that the respective hydraulic actuator has on allocation of flow from the first and second pumps.

16. The method as recited in claim 14 wherein deriving a first flow level comprises multiplying the flow command for the given hydraulic actuator by the altered first portion, and deriving a second flow level comprises multiplying the flow command for the given hydraulic actuator by the altered second portion.

17. The method as recited in claim 14 wherein step (d) further comprises operating one valve in response to the first flow level to supply fluid from the first pump to the given one of the plurality of hydraulic actuators, and operating another valve in response to the second flow level to supply fluid from the second pump to the given one of the plurality of hydraulic actuators.

18. The method as recited in claim 14 further comprising:

deriving a first pump flow command in response to all the first flow levels;

operating the first pump in response to the first pump flow command;

deriving a second pump flow command in response to all the second flow levels; and

operating the second pump in response to the second pump flow command.

19. The method as recited in claim 18 wherein the first pump flow command is derived by summing all the first flow levels, and the second flow command is derived by summing all the second flow levels.

20. The method as recited in claim 14 further comprising producing a first pump pressure setpoint for fluid from the first pump in response to load forces acting on each of the plurality of hydraulic actuators;

and producing a second pump pressure setpoint for fluid from the second pump in response to load forces acting on each of the plurality of hydraulic actuators.

21. The method as recited in claim 20 wherein producing a first pump pressure setpoint comprises:

for each of the plurality of hydraulic actuators, producing a function pressure setpoint in response to a load force acting on that hydraulic actuator;

producing a first pump pressure setpoint in response to the function pressure setpoints for those hydraulic actuators which receive fluid from the first pump; and

producing a second pump pressure setpoint in response to the function pressure setpoints for those hydraulic actuators which receive fluid from the second pump.

22. The method as recited in claim 21 wherein producing a first pump pressure setpoint selects a function pressure setpoint having a greatest value, and producing a second pump pressure setpoint selects a function pressure setpoint having a greatest value.

23. The method as recited in claim 21 further comprising controlling pressure of the fluid from the first pump in response to the first pump pressure setpoint;

and controlling pressure of the fluid from the second pump in response to the second pump pressure setpoint.

24. The method as recited in claim 14 further comprising:

determining a maximum power level for a prime mover that drives the first and second pumps; and

in response to the first flow level and the second flow level for all the plurality of hydraulic actuators, determining a first aggregate flow level desired to be produced by the first pump and determining a second aggregate flow level desired to be produced by the second pumps.

25. The method as recited in claim 24 further comprising when the first aggregate flow level desired to be produced by the first pump exceeds the maximum flow level producible by the first pump or the second aggregate flow level desired to be produced by the second pump exceeds the maximum flow level producible by the second pump, altering a calculation of the first aggregate flow level desired to be produced by the first pump so that the first aggregate flow level desired to be produced by the first pump is not greater than the maximum flow level producible by the first pump, or altering a calculation of the second aggregate flow level desired to be produced by the second pump, so that the second aggregate flow level desired to be produced by the second pump is not greater than the maximum flow level producible by the second pump.

26. A method for allocating flow of fluid from first and second pumps to a plurality of hydraulic actuators, said method comprising steps of:

(a) producing a plurality of flow commands, each of which specifies an amount of flow desired to be applied to a different one of the plurality of hydraulic actuators;

(b) for a given one the plurality of hydraulic actuators;

(1) determining a proportion of an aggregate maximum flow output of both the first and second pumps that is required to satisfy the flow command for the given hydraulic actuator,

(2) in response to the proportion of the aggregate maximum flow output, deriving an initial pump bias value denoting an apportionment of flow from the first and second pumps to the given hydraulic actuator, if no other hydraulic actuator is active,

(3) producing an allocation pump bias value by altering the initial pump bias value in response to the plurality flow commands for all the plurality of hydraulic actuators, the allocation pump bias value being calculated using a flow allocation gain for each of the plurality of hydraulic actuators, the allocation pump bias value denoting an apportionment of flow from the first and second pump to the given hydraulic actuator,

(4) in response to the allocation pump bias value, deriving a first proportion of the maximum flow output of the first pump to be applied to the given hydraulic actuator and deriving a second proportion of the maximum flow output of the second pump to be applied to the given hydraulic actuator;

(c) repeating step (b) for each of the plurality of hydraulic actuators;

(d) determining a maximum power level for a prime mover that drives the first and second pumps;

(e) defining a power limit flow function using at least a maximum fluid flow level producible by the first pump and a maximum fluid flow level producible by the second pump;

(f) determining if the plurality of flow commands exceeds the power limit flow function; and

(g) operating one valve in response to the first proportion and the flow command for the given hydraulic actuator to control fluid flow from the first pump, and operating another valve in response to the second proportion and the flow command for the given hydraulic actuator for the given hydraulic actuator to control fluid flow from the second pump.

27. The method as recited in claim 26 wherein deriving the initial pump bias value employs a predefined relationship between the flow command and the amount of flow provided by each of the first and second pumps.

28. The method as recited in claim 26 wherein producing the allocation pump bias value applies a weight factor to each flow command to produce a weighted flow proportion, and then applies all the weighted flow proportions to the initial pump bias value.

29. The method as recited in claim 28 wherein producing the allocation pump bias value further comprises adding the weighted flow proportions to the initial pump bias value.

30. The method as recited in claim 26 wherein the one valve is operated in response to a first flow level derived from the first proportion and flow command, and the other valve is operated in response to a second flow level derived from the second proportion and flow command.

31. The method as recited in claim 30 further comprising:

deriving a first pump flow command in response to all the first flow levels;

operating the first pump in response to the first pump flow command;

deriving a second pump flow command in response to all the second flow levels; and

operating the second pump in response to the second pump flow command.

32. The method as recited in claim 31 wherein the first pump flow command is derived by summing all the first flow levels, and the second flow command is derived by summing all the second flow levels.

33. The method as recited in claim 26 further comprising producing a first pump pressure setpoint for the first pump in response to load forces acting on at least some of the plurality of hydraulic actuators;

and producing a second pump pressure setpoint for the second pump in response to load forces acting on at least some of the plurality of hydraulic actuators.

34. The method as recited in claim 33 further comprising operating the first pump in response to the first pump pressure setpoint;

and operating the second pump in response to the second pump pressure setpoint.

35. The method as recited in claim 26 further comprising:

for each given hydraulic actuator, deriving a first flow level from the first proportion and the flow command for that given hydraulic actuator, and deriving a second flow level from the second proportion and flow command for that given hydraulic actuator; and

in response to the first and second flow levels for all the plurality of hydraulic actuators, determining a first aggregate flow level desired to be produced by the first pump and determining a second aggregate flow level desired to be produced by the second pump.

36. The method as recited in claim 35 further comprising when the first aggregate flow level desired to be produced by the first pump exceeds the maximum fluid flow level producible by the first pump or the second aggregate flow level desired to be produced by the second pump exceeds the maximum fluid flow level producible by the second pump, altering a calculation of the first aggregate flow level desired to be produced by the first pump so that the first aggregate flow level desired to be produced by the first pump is not greater than the maximum fluid flow level producible by the first pump, or altering calculation of the second aggregate flow level desired to be produced by the second pump, so that the second aggregate flow level desired to be produced by the second pump is not greater than the maximum fluid flow level producible by the second pump.

37. The method as recited in claim 26 wherein the flow allocation gain for at least one of the plurality of hydraulic actuators changes as a function of the initial pump bias value.