Adaptive shrinking software

• US 9,052,982 B1
• Filed: 01/17/2014
• Issued: 06/09/2015
• Est. Priority Date: 10/07/1998
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Open Invention Network LLC
• Original Assignee: Open Invention Network LLC
• Inventors: Ogilvie, John W. L.
• Primary Examiner(s): DENG, ANNA CHEN
• Application Number:
  US14/158,132
• Time in Patent Office: 508 Days
• Field of Search: 717/110
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 8/33 Intelligent editors
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 8/70 Software maintenance or management
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 9/44521 Dynamic linking or loading; Link editing at or after load time, e.g. Java class loading

Abstract

Methods, articles, signals, and systems are provided for adaptively shrinking software. The software includes one or more adaptive features. A tracking facility tracks use of the adaptive features, and when it is determined that a given feature is unwanted or unnecessary in the software configuration preferred by a given user, a separation facility separates the feature from the rest of the software. The feature is then archived or deleted. In this manner, resources such as disk space are conserved, program load time and memory requirements are reduced, and user interfaces and supporting code are tailored to meet the needs of particular users.

Claims

1. A method comprising:

receiving a feature record corresponding to a modular feature of a computer program,

determining, from the feature record, a history of invocation of the modular feature by one or more users;

determining, from the feature record, a feature-specific separation criterion associated with the modular feature;

determining, from the feature record, a status of the modular feature being one of a permanent feature and a removable feature;

comparing, using a computer system, the history of invocation to the feature-specific separation criterion to assess a candidate status of the modular feature for removal; and

selecting the modular feature for removal from the computer program based on the candidate status of the modular feature.

2. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

removing a code portion associated with the modular feature from the computer program based on the selecting of the modular feature for removal.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the removing of the code portion includes deleting the code portion.

4. The method of claim 2, wherein the removing of the code portion includes archiving the code portion on a remote computing system.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the feature-specific separation criterion designates the modular feature as a removal candidate based on the modular feature not being invoked during a particular period of time.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the feature-specific separation criterion designates the modular feature as a removal candidate based on the modular feature being invoked during a period of time defined by an installation time of the modular feature and not being invoked during a subsequent period of time.

7. The method of claim 1,

wherein the selecting of the modular feature for removal is further based on the status of the modular feature.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the feature-specific separation criterion designates the modular feature as a removal candidate based on a system hardware requirement not being met.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein the feature-specific separation criterion designates the modular feature as a removal candidate based on a license status of the modular feature.

10. A method comprising:

detecting a trigger configured to initiate a search for removal candidate features;

identifying a feature of a computer program that can be removed from the computer program while allowing the computer program to run other different features;

evaluating, using a computing system, a separation criterion specific to the feature;

tracking a history of invocation of the feature to determine a pattern of invocation of the feature;

comparing the pattern of invocation of the feature to the separation criterion to determine a status of the feature, wherein the status of the feature being one of a permanent feature and a removable feature; and

selecting the feature for removal from the program based on the status of the feature.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein the trigger corresponds to a complexity of a user interface of the computer program.

12. The method of claim 10, wherein the trigger corresponds to a forthcoming release of a new feature.

13. The method of claim 10, wherein the trigger corresponds to an available computing resource falling below a threshold.

14. An apparatus comprising a non-transitory, tangible computer readable storage medium storing instructions that, when executed by a computer processor, carry out:

identifying a modular feature of a computer program;

identifying a separation criterion of the modular feature from an adaptive feature record corresponding to the modular feature;

tracking a history of invocation of the modular feature to determine a pattern of invocation of the modular feature;

comparing the pattern of invocation of the modular feature to the separation criterion to determine a status of the modular feature, wherein the status of the modular feature being one of a permanent feature and a removable feature; and

identifying the modular feature for removal based on the status of the modular feature.

15. The apparatus of claim 14, wherein the storage medium has further instructions that carry out:

assigning a priority for removal to the modular feature relative to other modular features of the computer program.

16. The apparatus of claim 14, wherein the storage medium has further instructions that carry out:

identifying computer hardware associated with the modular feature; and

determining whether the computer hardware associated with the modular feature is present in a computing system, wherein the removal candidate status is further determined by the determining of whether the computer hardware associated with the modular feature is present.

17. The apparatus of claim 14, wherein the storage medium has further instructions that carry out determining a licensing status of the modular feature, and wherein the removal candidate status of the modular feature is further determined by the licensing status.

18. The apparatus of claim 14, wherein the storage medium has further instructions that carry out:

removing a code portion associated with the modular feature from the computer program based on the identifying of the modular feature for removal.

19. The apparatus of claim 18, wherein the instructions that carry out the removing of the code portion include further instructions that carry out deleting the code portion from a computer system.

20. The apparatus of claim 18, wherein the instructions that carry out the removing of the code portion include further instructions that carry out archiving the code portion on a remote computing system.