Energy savings with optimized motion profiles

• US 9,067,762 B2
• Filed: 07/15/2009
• Issued: 06/30/2015
• Est. Priority Date: 07/15/2009
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Otis Elevator Company (Otis Worldwide Corp.)
• Original Assignee: Otis Elevator Company (Otis Worldwide Corp.)
• Inventors: Fargo, Richard N., Pulling, Richard K.
• Primary Examiner(s): SALATA, ANTHONY J
• Application Number:
  US13/380,934
• Publication Number:
  US 20120111670A1
• Time in Patent Office: 2,176 Days
• Field of Search: 187/247, 187/289, 187/290, 187/293, 187/295, 187/296, 187/297, 187397-393, 187/375, 187/376, 187391-393, 318/375, 318/376
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: B66B 1/285 with the use of a speed pattern generator
• CPC Class Codes: B66B 1/302 for energy saving
• CPC Class Codes: Y02B 50/00 Energy efficient technologies in elevators, escalators and moving walkways, e.g. energy saving or recuperation technologies

Abstract

An elevator system includes a car, a hoist motor for elevating and lowering the car, a brake for limiting car movement, an input device for selecting a destination for a run, and a controller. The controller receives a command from the input device and controls operation of the hoist motor and the brake. The controller has a loss reduction mode wherein the controller selects a velocity profile for the run that varies according to car load, run direction, and run distance to reduce a combined set of energy losses for the run.

Claims

1. An elevator system comprising:

a car;

a hoist motor for elevating and lowering the car;

a brake for limiting car movement;

an input device for selecting a destination for a run; and

a controller for receiving a command from the input device and for controlling operation of the hoist motor and the brake, wherein the controller has a loss reduction mode wherein the controller selects a velocity profile for the run that varies according to car load, run direction, and run distance to reduce a combined set of energy losses for the run;

wherein the combined set of energy losses is substantially minimized within a set of constraints in the loss reduction mode;

wherein the set of constraints includes limits on velocity, acceleration, jerk, and time for the run.

2. The elevator system of claim 1, wherein the combined set of energy losses includes motor losses, brake losses, and drive losses.

3. The elevator system of claim 1, and further comprising:

a regenerative elevator drive for driving the hoist motor when operating in a drive mode and for delivering regenerated electrical power to a power supply when operating in a regeneration mode.

4. The elevator system of claim 1, wherein the controller further has a normal mode in which a normal velocity profile for the run has a combined set of energy losses greater than that of the velocity profile selected in the loss reduction mode.

5. The elevator system of claim 4, wherein a portion of the velocity profile selected in the loss reduction mode has a greater jerk value at a beginning or end of the run than a corresponding portion of the normal velocity profile selected in the normal mode for the run.

6. The elevator system of claim 4, wherein a portion of the velocity profile selected in the loss reduction mode has a greater magnitude of deceleration than a corresponding portion of the normal velocity profile selected in the normal mode for the run.

7. An elevator system comprising:

a car;

a hoist motor for elevating and lowering the car;

a brake for limiting car movement;

an input device for selecting a destination for a run; and

a controller for receiving a command from the input device and for controlling operation of the hoist motor and the brake, wherein the controller has a normal mode that selects a first velocity profile for the run and a loss reduction mode that selects a second velocity profile for the run, wherein the second velocity profile uses less energy for the run than that of the first velocity profile, and wherein the second velocity profile has greater maximum jerk magnitude than the first velocity profile;

wherein jerk at the beginning and jerk at the end of the first velocity profile have magnitudes greater than jerk at the beginning and jerk at the end of the second velocity profile, respectively.

8. The elevator system of claim 7, wherein the second velocity profile varies according to car load, run direction, and run distance to reduce a combined set of energy losses including motor losses, brake losses, and drive losses for the run.

9. The elevator system of claim 7, wherein the combined set of energy losses is substantially minimized within a predetermined set of constraints in the loss reduction mode.

10. The elevator system of claim 7, and further comprising:

a regenerative elevator drive for driving the hoist motor when operating in a drive mode and for delivering regenerated electrical power to a power supply when operating in a regeneration mode.

11. A method for operating an elevator, the method comprising:

receiving a command for a run in an elevator car;

selecting a velocity profile as a function of run direction, run distance, and car load to reduce a combined set of energy losses for that run; and

controlling motion of the elevator car according to the selected velocity profile;

wherein selecting a velocity profile includes determining the combined set of energy losses for a plurality of potential velocity profiles based upon the run direction, run distance, and car load prior to selecting the velocity profile;

wherein determining the combined set of energy losses includes;

determining copper and iron energy losses for a permanent magnet motor to move the elevator car over the course of the run;

determining energy losses to operate a brake over the course of the run;

determining switching energy losses to operate an elevator drive over the course of the run; and

calculating the combined set of energy losses to include losses for the permanent motor, the brake, and the elevator drive.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein the combined set of energy losses includes motor losses, brake losses, and drive losses.

13. The method of claim 11, wherein the combined set of energy losses for the velocity profile selected is smaller than that for a normal velocity profile.

14. The method of claim 11, wherein combined energy loss is minimized within a predetermined set of constraints that include limits on velocity, acceleration, jerk, and time.

15. The method of claim 11, and further comprising:

determining whether to move the elevator car in a normal mode or a loss reduction mode prior to selecting the velocity profile.