System and method for characterizing dragging equipment

• US 9,090,271 B2
• Filed: 10/24/2012
• Issued: 07/28/2015
• Est. Priority Date: 10/24/2012
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Progress Rail Services Corporation (Caterpillar Incorporated)
• Original Assignee: Progress Rail Services Corporation (Caterpillar Incorporated)
• Inventors: Bartonek, Mark Joseph
• Primary Examiner(s): Nguyen, John Q
• Assistant Examiner(s): KERRIGAN, MICHAEL V
• Application Number:
  US13/659,199
• Publication Number:
  US 20140110536A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,007 Days
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: B61L 27/57 for vehicles or trains, e.g. trackside supervision of train conditions
• CPC Class Codes: G01M 7/00 Vibration-testing of structures; Shock-testing of structures G01M9/00 takes precedence

Abstract

The disclosure is directed to a method and apparatus for characterizing an object protruding beneath a train traveling along a rail. The method may include receiving one or more signals indicative of a detected horizontal force component and a detected vertical force component generated by impact of the object with a stationary impact element. The method may also characterize the object based on the detected horizontal and vertical force components.

Claims

1. A method of characterizing dragging equipment protruding beneath a train traveling along a rail, the method comprising:

receiving one or more signals indicative of a detected horizontal force component and a detected vertical force component generated by impact of the dragging equipment with a stationary impact element of a sensor;

determining, using a processor, a type of the dragging equipment based on the detected horizontal and vertical force components, and implementing a control action based on the determined type of the dragging equipment.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein characterizing the dragging equipment includes making a comparison of the detected horizontal and vertical force components with known force components of types of the dragging equipment expected to impact the stationary impact element.

3. The method of claim 2, further including implementing a control action based on the comparison.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein implementing a control action based on the comparison includes taking a first control action when the detected horizontal and vertical force components are approximately the same as known force components of impacts by types of the dragging equipment expected to be hanging down underneath the train.

5. The method of claim 3, wherein implementing a control action based on the comparison includes taking a second control action when the detected horizontal and vertical force components are approximately the same as known force components of impacts caused by a flat wheel.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein receiving one or more signals indicative of a detected horizontal force component and a detected vertical force component includes receiving acceleration signals for accelerations in two different orthogonal directions.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein characterizing the dragging equipment includes referencing a look-up table of impact forces characteristically generated by the types of the dragging equipment expected to impact the stationary impact element.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein receiving one or more signals includes generating a charge using the piezoelectric effect of materials in the sensors, with the charge proportional to acceleration of the sensors resulting from an impact on the stationary impact element.

9. The method of claim 1, further including:

determining magnitudes and durations of the detected horizontal and vertical force components; and

characterizing the dragging equipment based on magnitudes and durations of the detected horizontal and vertical force components.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein characterizing the dragging equipment includes comparing magnitudes of the detected horizontal and vertical force components with known magnitudes of force components generated by objects expected to impact the stationary impact element.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein characterizing the dragging equipment includes comparing durations of the detected horizontal and vertical force components with known durations of force components generated by objects expected to impact the stationary impact element.

12. The method of claim 1, wherein characterizing the dragging equipment includes:

comparing the detected horizontal force component with a first range of values; and

comparing the detected vertical force component with a second range of values to determine the type of the dragging equipment.

13. The method of claim 1, wherein the type of the dragging equipment includes one of:

a first type including a door hanging down from a hopper; and

a second type including a dragging air hose or a brake line.

14. An apparatus for characterizing dragging equipment protruding beneath a train moving along rails, the apparatus comprising:

a stationary impact element positioned to extend in a direction approximately orthogonal to a travel direction of the train and extending across the rails, wherein an impact surface of the stationary impact element is oriented at an angle inclined to the travel direction;

one or more sensors mounted on the stationary impact element in one or more directions that allow each of the one or more sensors to detect horizontal and vertical force components on the stationary impact element when the dragging equipment impacts the stationary impact element; and

a processor configured to determine a type of the dragging equipment based on the horizontal and vertical force components.

15. The apparatus of claim 14, wherein the processor is further configured to characterize the dragging equipment by comparing the detected horizontal and vertical force components with directional force components of known types of the dragging equipment expected to impact the stationary impact element.

16. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein the processor is further configured to implement a control action based on the comparison.

17. The apparatus of claim 16, wherein the processor is further configured to implement a first control action when the horizontal force components are larger than the vertical force components, and implement a second control action when the vertical force components are larger than the horizontal force components, the first and second control actions being different.

18. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein the processor is further configured to reference a look-up table of impact forces characteristically generated by the known types of the dragging equipment.

19. The apparatus of claim 14, wherein:

the stationary impact element is a first stationary impact element; and

the apparatus further includes a plurality of stationary impact elements spaced at intervals extending in the direction approximately orthogonal to the travel direction of the train and extending across the rails, with at least one of the plurality of stationary impact elements positioned between the rails and at least another one of the plurality of stationary impact elements positioned adjacent the outside of at least one of the rails.

20. The apparatus of claim 14, wherein the one or more sensors comprise at least one sensor mounted on the stationary impact element and adapted to sense acceleration in two or more orthogonal directions.

21. The apparatus of claim 14, wherein the one or more sensors are each mounted on the stationary impact element at approximately a 45 degree angle to a horizontal direction extending across the rails.

22. The apparatus of claim 14, wherein the one or more sensors comprise an accelerometer mounted on the stationary impact element on a side of the stationary impact element opposite from a side on which the dragging equipment impacts the stationary impact element.

23. The apparatus of claim 14, wherein the one or more sensors comprise transducers that use the piezoelectric effect to generate charges proportional to acceleration.

24. The apparatus of claim 14, wherein the one or more sensors are embedded in a layer of material adhered to the stationary impact element.

25. The apparatus of claim 14, wherein the type of the dragging equipment includes one of:

a first type including a door hanging down from a hopper; and

a second type including a dragging air hose or a brake line.

26. A method of characterizing dragging equipment protruding under a train traveling along a rail, the method comprising:

receiving one or more signals indicative of a detected horizontal force component and a detected vertical force component generated by impact of the dragging equipment with a stationary impact element of a sensor;

receiving from a look-up table known directional force components of the types of the dragging equipment expected to impact the stationary impact element;

making a comparison, using a processor, of the detected horizontal and vertical force components with the known directional force components;

determining, using the processor, a type of the dragging equipment based on the comparison; and

implementing a control action based on the comparison.