Method and apparatus for obtaining entity-related decision support information based on user-supplied preferences

• US 9,092,052 B2
• Filed: 04/09/2013
• Issued: 07/28/2015
• Est. Priority Date: 04/10/2012
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Perfact Corporation
• Original Assignee: Andreas Kornstadt
• Inventors: Kornstdt, Andreas, Mertins, Ingo
• Primary Examiner(s): Lin, Kenny
• Application Number:
  US13/859,575
• Publication Number:
  US 20140026044A1
• Time in Patent Office: 840 Days
• Field of Search: None
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/9535 Search customisation based on user profiles and personalisation
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 3/01 Input arrangements or combined input and output arrangements for interaction between user and computer G06F3/16 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 3/016 Input arrangements with force or tactile feedback as computer generated output to the user
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 3/167 Audio in a user interface, e.g. using voice commands for navigating, audio feedback

Abstract

In a portable computing device having at least one kind of input, at least one kind of output, and a data communications interface, a method and apparatus for obtaining entity-related “acceptable or unacceptable” decisions based on matching the results of internet information retrieval against user-supplied, persistent preferences are described. User-supplied preferences consist of a list of internet information resources the user wants to be examined to obtain a decision about whether or not an entity is acceptable, and of a list of criteria that an entity from said internet information resources has to meet to be found acceptable by the user. In one embodiment, a graphical user interface on the portable computing device is provided, allowing the identification of an entity. Identification of an entity automatically initiates information retrieval about the identified entity from the internet information resources of the user'"'"'s preferences, automatically yielding, upon completion, a clearly discernible output in the form of a ternary “acceptable”/“unacceptable”/“undecidable” indicator on the portable computing device. The “acceptable” indicator is output if at least one criterion from the user'"'"'s preferences has been met and no criterion from the user'"'"'s preferences has been violated; the “unacceptable” indicator is output if at least one criterion from the user'"'"'s preferences has been violated; the “undecidable” indicator is output otherwise.

Claims

1. A method of obtaining ternary “

acceptable”

, “

unacceptable”

, or “

undecidable”

entity-related decision support information with a portable computing device by way of matching the results of internet data retrieval against user-supplied, persistent preferences, said portable computing device having at least one kind of input, at least one kind of output, and a data communication interface, and the user-supplied, persistent preferences taking the form of an acceptance profile having a list of internet information resources to examine, and a list of acceptability criteria pertaining to said resources, said method comprising;

waiting for user-initiated entity identification,

receiving at least one user input via said input device identifying an entity,

automatically trying to obtain information about said identified entity from each internet information resource of said user'"'"'s acceptance profile,

automatically determining for every criterion of said user'"'"'s acceptance profile whether said criterion has been met or violated based on said obtained information,

automatically outputting a clearly discernible ternary indicator indicating the overall acceptability of said indentified identified entity based on said user'"'"'s acceptance profile,

outputting an indicator indicating “

acceptable”

if at least one criterion has been met and no criterion has been violated, or

outputting an indicator indicating “

unacceptable”

if at least one criterion has been violated, or

outputting an indicator indicating “

undecidable”

otherwise.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein said input device comprises a textual input device.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein said input device comprises a haptic input device and said haptic input device is used to provide said user-initiated entity identification from a list of one or more pre-defined entities.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein said input device comprises an optical input device and said optical input device is used to acquire images to identify said entity using barcode recognition algorithms, optical character recognition algorithms, or image recognition algorithms.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein said input device comprises an acoustic input device and said acoustic input device is used to acquire sounds to identify said entity using voice recognition algorithms.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein said input device comprises a near field communications receptor and said near field communications receptor is used to identify said entity.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein said output device comprises a graphical display.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein said output device comprises an acoustic output device and said acoustic output device is used to output decision support information using audio signals, prerecorded texts, or synthesized texts.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein said output device comprises a vibrational output device and said vibrational output device is used to output vibrational patterns.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein said output device comprises an optical output device and said optical output device is used to display decision support information by overlaying said identified entities with said decision support information employing augmented reality algorithms.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein said user'"'"'s acceptance profile persistently resides on a computing device outside said portable computing devices.

12. The method of claim 1, wherein said steps of said method pertaining to obtaining information about said identified entity and determining whether for every criterion of said user'"'"'s acceptance profile whether said criterion has been met or violated based on said obtained information, takes place on a computing device outside said portable computing device.

13. The method of claim 1, wherein said decision support information is complemented by a list having one entry for every criterion of said user'"'"'s acceptance profile, clearly indicating how each criterion has been met, namely whether it has been met, whether it has been violated, or whether no information could be obtained.

14. A machine for obtaining ternary “

acceptable”

, “

unacceptable”

, or “

undecidable”

entity-related decision support information on a portable computing device, said machine comprising;

a memory which is able to store user-supplied, persistent preferences taking the form of an acceptance profile having a list of internet information resources to examine, and a list of acceptability criteria pertaining to said resources,

one or more input means capable of identifying on or more entities,

one or more output means capable of outputting a clear discernible ternary indicator indicating the overall acceptability of each said identified entity in the form of an “

acceptable”

indicator, an “

unacceptable”

indicator, or an “

undecidable”

indicator,

a memory controller which will;

wait for user-initiated entity identification,

receive at least one user input via one of said input means identifying an entity,

automatically try to obtain information about said identified entity from each internet information resource of said user'"'"'s acceptance profile,

automatically determine for every criterion of said user'"'"'s acceptance profile whether the criterion has been met or violated based on said obtained information,

automatically output a clearly discernible ternary indicator indicating the overall acceptability of said identified entity based on said user'"'"'s acceptance profile,

outputting an indicator indicating “

acceptable”

if at least one criterion has been met and no criterion has been violated, or

outputting an indicator indicating “

unacceptable”

if at least one criterion has been violated, or

outputting an indicator indicating “

undecidable”

otherwise.

15. The method of claim 14, wherein said input means comprises a textual input device.

16. The method of claim 14, wherein said input means comprises a haptic input device and said haptic input device is used to provide said user-initiated entity identification from a list of one or more pre-defined entities.

17. The method of claim 14, wherein said input means comprises an optical input device and said optical input device is used to acquire images to identify said entity using barcode recognition algorithms, optical character recognition algorithms, or image recognition algorithms.

18. The method of claim 14, wherein said input means comprises an acoustic input device and said acoustic input device is used to acquire sounds to identify said entity using voice recognition algorithms.

19. The method of claim 14, wherein said input means comprises a near field communications receptor and said near field communications receptor is used to identify said entity.

20. The method of claim 14, wherein said output means comprises a graphical display.

21. The method of claim 14, wherein said output means comprises an acoustic output device and said acoustic output device is used to output decision support information using audio signals, prerecorded texts, or synthesized texts.

22. The method of claim 14, wherein said output means comprises a vibrational output device and said vibrational output device is used to output vibrational patterns.

23. The method of claim 14, wherein said output means comprises an optical output device and said optical output device is used to display decision support information by overlaying said identified entities with said decision support information employing augmented reality algorithms.

24. The method of claim 14, wherein said memory controller complements said decision support information by a list having one entry for every criterion of said user'"'"'s acceptance profile, clearly indicating how each criterion has been met, namely whether it has been met, whether it has been violated, or whether no information could be obtained.