Subselection of portions of an image review sequence using spatial or other selectors
First Claim
1. An image review system for processing reviewer inputs related to an image, comprising:
- an input for receiving reviewer position indicators, wherein a first reviewer position indicator of the reviewer position indicators corresponds to a first subset region of the image to which a reviewer indicates;
storage for the reviewer position indicators;
wherein the first reviewer position indicator of the reviewer position indicators is stored with a first timestamp representing a review time at which the reviewer indicated the first subset region of the image;
an input for receiving reviewer commentary data;
storage for the reviewer commentary data, wherein first reviewer commentary data corresponds to the first subset region of the image associated with the first reviewer position indicator, and wherein the first reviewer commentary data is stored with the first reviewer position indicator and the first timestamp;
logic for generating a map of aggregated reviewer position indicators, wherein the map, when overlaid on the image, indicates portions of the image commented on by the reviewer at a plurality of review times; and
a display for displaying the map of aggregated reviewer position indicators, wherein the map of aggregated reviewer position indicators is two dimensional, and wherein the aggregated reviewer position indicators correspond to summations of review activity over a plurality of actions on a plurality of reviewed images, andwherein the summations of review activity over the plurality of actions on the plurality of reviewed images comprise summations based on one or more objects'"'"' varying positions from image to image, wherein the varying positions correspond to motions of the one or more objects from image to image in the plurality of reviewed images.
1 Assignment
0 Petitions
Accused Products
Abstract
An image review system presents an image to a reviewer and records reviewer feedback, including reviewer position indicators relating to portions of the image and reviewer commentary data, which can be audio, visual, textual, etc. The reviewer position indicators and reviewer commentary data each have a time component, corresponding to when the reviewer indicated a position on the image and when the reviewer provided the commentary, respectively. During playback, the viewer can select a subset of the image of interest and get a playback of the reviewer commentary data that corresponds to the times represented by the reviewer position indicators that fall within the selected subset of the image. The reviewer position indicators can be collectively indicated by a heat map that, when laid over the image, indicates which portions of the image are commented on and how much time is spent there.
19 Citations
19 Claims
-
1. An image review system for processing reviewer inputs related to an image, comprising:
-
an input for receiving reviewer position indicators, wherein a first reviewer position indicator of the reviewer position indicators corresponds to a first subset region of the image to which a reviewer indicates; storage for the reviewer position indicators;
wherein the first reviewer position indicator of the reviewer position indicators is stored with a first timestamp representing a review time at which the reviewer indicated the first subset region of the image;an input for receiving reviewer commentary data; storage for the reviewer commentary data, wherein first reviewer commentary data corresponds to the first subset region of the image associated with the first reviewer position indicator, and wherein the first reviewer commentary data is stored with the first reviewer position indicator and the first timestamp; logic for generating a map of aggregated reviewer position indicators, wherein the map, when overlaid on the image, indicates portions of the image commented on by the reviewer at a plurality of review times; and a display for displaying the map of aggregated reviewer position indicators, wherein the map of aggregated reviewer position indicators is two dimensional, and wherein the aggregated reviewer position indicators correspond to summations of review activity over a plurality of actions on a plurality of reviewed images, and wherein the summations of review activity over the plurality of actions on the plurality of reviewed images comprise summations based on one or more objects'"'"' varying positions from image to image, wherein the varying positions correspond to motions of the one or more objects from image to image in the plurality of reviewed images. - View Dependent Claims (2)
-
-
3. A method of processing image review data, comprising:
-
displaying, by a computer, an image to be reviewed; recording, by the computer, reviewer commentary data, wherein the reviewer commentary data has associated timestamps; recording, by the computer, a plurality of reviewer position indicators, wherein a first reviewer position indicator of the reviewer position indicators corresponds to a first subset region of the image to which a reviewer indicates while commenting, and wherein recording the first reviewer position indicator includes storing a first timestamp representing a review time at which the reviewer indicated the first subset region of the image; and generating, by the computer, a map of aggregated reviewer position indicators, wherein the map, when overlaid on the image, indicates portions of the image commented on by the reviewer at a plurality of review times, wherein the map of aggregated reviewer position indicators is two dimensional, wherein the aggregated reviewer position indicators correspond to summations of review activity over a plurality of actions on a plurality of reviewed images, and wherein the summations of review activity over the plurality of actions on the plurality of reviewed images comprise summations based on one or more objects'"'"' varying positions from image to image, wherein the varying positions correspond to motions of the one or more objects from image to image in the plurality of reviewed images. - View Dependent Claims (4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19)
-
Specification