Identifying hierarchical chip design intellectual property through digests

• US 9,122,825 B2
• Filed: 10/07/2013
• Issued: 09/01/2015
• Est. Priority Date: 06/10/2011
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Oasis Tooling, Inc.
• Original Assignee: Oasis Tooling, Inc.
• Inventors: Champman, David
• Primary Examiner(s): Whitmore, Stacy
• Assistant Examiner(s): Dimyan, Magid
• Application Number:
  US14/047,883
• Publication Number:
  US 20140181764A1
• Time in Patent Office: 694 Days
• Field of Search: 716/107, 716/106, 716/111, 716100-101
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 2115/08 Intellectual property [IP] blocks or IP cores
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 30/30 Circuit design
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 30/327 Logic synthesis; Behaviour synthesis, e.g. mapping logic, HDL to netlist, high-level language to RTL or netlist
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 30/33 Design verification, e.g. functional simulation or model checking
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 30/398 Design verification or optimisation, e.g. using design rule check [DRC], layout versus schematics [LVS] or finite element methods [FEM] optical proximity correction [OPC] design processes G03F1/36

Abstract

One method implementation disclosed includes detecting matching leaf cells that have functionally identical designs (optionally, similar designs) and assigning matching names for the matching leaf cells to replace original, non-matching names. Optionally, digests can be calculated for the leaf cells and used to detect similarities and/or differences. The matching names are propagated to at least some higher-level cells in the hierarchical design, in place of the original names. The method can further include calculating digests for at least some of the higher level cells after the propagating of the matching names into the higher level cells. Various design matching technologies can be used in combination with cell renaming and new name propagation, not limited to use of digests. Dependency chains can be calculated to improve propagation of names through the hierarchy.

Claims

1. A computer-implemented method of analyzing cells in a hierarchical design of a circuit device for functional similarity, the method including:

analyzing the hierarchical design using a processor to determine dependency chains from leaf cells that do not reference any other cells in the hierarchical design upward to higher levels in the hierarchical design, wherein n-level cells, by definition, are limited to referencing leaf cells through n−

1 level cells and not referencing n−

level or n+level cells;

detecting matching leaf cells, assigning matching names to the matching leaf cells, and propagating the matching names to higher level cells in the hierarchical design in place of the original, non-matching names of the matching leaf cells;

applying the detecting, assigning and propagating steps to at least some first-level, second-level, third-level, and subsequent-level cells along the dependency chains; and

evaluating functional similarity of at least some of the n-level cells above the leaf cells in the hierarchical design after propagating the matching names into the n-level cells along the dependency chains.

2. The method of claim 1, further including speculative matching of cells, including:

detecting leaf cells that appear to be modified counterparts of one another and assigning matching names to the modified counterpart leaf cells to replace original, non-matching names of the modified counterpart leaf cells, before the propagating of the matching names;

applying the detecting, assigning and propagating steps for modified counterparts to at least some first-level, second-level, third-level and subsequent-level cells along the dependency chains; and

evaluating functional similarity of at least some of the n-level cells above the leaf cells in the hierarchical design after propagating the matching names into the higher-level cells along the dependency chains.

3. The method of claim 1, further including comparing at least some features of the cells in the hierarchical design to features of reference cells and reporting at least some results of the comparing.

4. The method of claim 2, further including reporting at least some of the detected modified counterparts.

5. A computer-readable storage medium storing computer program instructions that, when executed on a processor, carry out actions including:

analyzing the hierarchical design using a processor to determine dependency chains from leaf cells that do not reference any other cells in the hierarchical design upward to higher levels in the hierarchical design, wherein n-level cells, by definition, are limited to referencing leaf cells through n−

1 level cells and not referencing n−

level or n+level cells;

detecting matching leaf cells, assigning matching names to the matching leaf cells, and propagating the matching names to higher level cells in the hierarchical design in place of the original, non-matching names of the matching leaf cells;

applying the detecting, assigning and propagating steps to at least some first-level, second-level, third-level, and subsequent-level cells along the dependency chains; and

evaluating functional similarity of at least some of the n-level cells above the leaf cells in the hierarchical design after propagating the matching names into the n-level cells along the dependency chains.

6. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 5, further including program instructions to carry out speculative matching of cells, including:

detecting leaf cells that appear to be modified counterparts of one another and assigning matching names to the modified counterpart leaf cells to replace original, non-matching names of the modified counterpart leaf cells, before the propagating of the matching names;

applying the detecting, assigning and propagating steps for modified counterparts to at least some first-level, second-level, third-level and subsequent-level cells along the dependency chains; and

evaluating functional similarity of at least some of the n-level cells above the leaf cells in the hierarchical design after propagating the matching names into the higher-level cells along the dependency chains.

7. A computer system including:

a processor; and

a computer-readable storage medium storing computer program instructions that, when executed on the processor, carry out actions including;

analyzing the hierarchical design using a processor to determine dependency chains from leaf cells that do not reference any other cells in the hierarchical design upward to higher levels in the hierarchical design, wherein n-level cells, by definition, are limited to referencing leaf cells through n−

1 level cells and not referencing n−

level or n+level cells;

detecting matching leaf cells, assigning matching names to the matching leaf cells, and propagating the matching names to higher level cells in the hierarchical design in place of the original, non-matching names of the matching leaf cells;

applying the detecting, assigning and propagating steps to at least some first-level, second-level, third-level, and subsequent-level cells along the dependency chains; and

evaluating functional similarity of at least some of the n-level cells above the leaf cells in the hierarchical design after propagating the matching names into the n-level cells along the dependency chains.

8. The computer system of claim 7, further including program instructions to carry out speculative matching of cells, including:

detecting leaf cells that appear to be modified counterparts of one another and assigning matching names to the modified counterpart leaf cells to replace original, non-matching names of the modified counterpart leaf cells, before the propagating of the matching names;

applying the detecting, assigning and propagating steps for modified counterparts to at least some first-level, second-level, third-level and subsequent-level cells along the dependency chains; and

evaluating functional similarity of at least some of the n-level cells above the leaf cells in the hierarchical design after propagating the matching names into the higher-level cells along the dependency chains.