Monitoring health of a predistortion system

• US 9,226,189 B1
• Filed: 08/18/2014
• Issued: 12/29/2015
• Est. Priority Date: 08/18/2014
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Nokia Solutions and Networks US LLC (Nokia Corporation)
• Original Assignee: Nokia Solutions and Networks US LLC (Nokia Corporation)
• Inventors: Kularatna, Shavantha, Reichl, Christian, Jelonnek, Bjoern, Pereira, Alan
• Primary Examiner(s): Vlahos, Sophia
• Application Number:
  US14/462,035
• Time in Patent Office: 498 Days
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: H04B 17/17 Detection of non-compliance or faulty performance, e.g. response deviations H04B17/18 takes precedence

Abstract

At a current time, a current intermodulation content of a predistortion system is determined. An intermodulation ratio is determined using the current intermodulation content and a previous intermodulation content for the predistortion system. The previous intermodulation content is determined at a time previous to the current time. The determined intermodulation ratio is compared with stored intermodulation ratios. A warning is communicated in response to the comparing indicating the predistortion system is unhealthy. Apparatus and computer program products are also disclosed.

Claims

1. A method, comprising:

determining at a current time a current intermodulation content of a predistortion system;

determining an intermodulation ratio using the current intermodulation content and a previous intermodulation content for the predistortion system, the previous intermodulation content determined at a time previous to the current time;

comparing the determined intermodulation ratio with stored intermodulation ratios; and

communicating a warning in response to the comparing indicating the predistortion system is unhealthy.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the current intermodulation content determines the intermodulation content for a predistortion system considered to be potentially unhealthy, and the wherein previous intermodulation content was determined at a time when the predistortion system was considered to be healthy.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the current intermodulation content determines the intermodulation content for a predistortion system at a potentially partially corrected state, and the wherein previous intermodulation content was determined at a time when the predistortion system was considered to be at a fully corrected state.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein:

determining the current intermodulation content further comprises determining the current intermodulation content using transmitted waveforms and feedback waveforms at the potentially partially corrected state;

the previous intermodulation content was determined using transmitted waveforms and feedback waveforms at a fully corrected state of the predistortion system; and

a transmitted waveform is a signal before the predistortion system and a feedback waveform is a signal from an output of the predistortion system.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein:

determining the previous intermodulation content is determined by;

determining a first difference between a first mean squared error of samples of a feedback waveform created from a transmitted waveform having N^th order intermodulation added thereto and samples of the transmitted waveform having the N^th order intermodulation added thereto; and

determining a second difference between a mean squared error of samples of a feedback waveform created from a transmitted waveform without N^th order intermodulation added thereto and samples of the transmitted waveform without the N^th order intermodulation added thereto; and

subtracting the first difference from the second difference to determine the previous intermodulation content; and

the current intermodulation content is determined by;

determining a third difference between a first mean squared error of samples of a feedback waveform created from a transmitted waveform having N^th order intermodulation added thereto and samples of the transmitted waveform having the N^th order intermodulation added thereto; and

determining a fourth difference between a mean squared error of samples of a feedback waveform created from a transmitted waveform without N^th order intermodulation added thereto and samples of the transmitted waveform without the N^th order intermodulation added thereto; and

subtracting the fourth difference from the third difference to determine the current intermodulation content.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein the intermodulation ratio is determined as follows:

IM_Ratio=Delta1/Delta2, where IM_Ratio is the intermodulation ratio, where Delta1=(MSE_D−

MSE_C), where Delta2=(MSE_B−

MSE_A), MSE_D is the fourth difference, MSE_C is the third difference, MSE_B is the second difference, and MSE_A is the first difference.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the stored intermodulation ratios comprise intermodulation ratios taken at a time a predistortion system was known to be healthy.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein the stored intermodulation ratios further comprise one or more intermodulation ratios for the predistortion system based on manually introduced degradation for the predistortion system, wherein the manually introduced degradation simulates values of intermodulation ratios for a predistortion system deemed to be unhealthy.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein:

comparing further comprises determining whether a value of the intermodulation ratio is above a threshold for intermodulation ratio and determining the predistortion system is unhealthy based on the value of the intermodulation ratio being above the threshold.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein comparing further comprises determining whether a value of the intermodulation ratio is above a second threshold that is less than the first threshold in terms of values of the intermodulation ratio for the first and second thresholds and determining the predistortion system is unhealthy based on the value of the intermodulation ratio being above the second threshold.

11. An apparatus, comprising:

one or more processors; and

one or more memories including computer program code,

the one or more memories and the computer program code configured, with the one or more processors, to cause the apparatus to perform at least the following;

determining at a current time a current intermodulation content of a predistortion system;

determining an intermodulation ratio using the current intermodulation content and a previous intermodulation content for the predistortion system, the previous intermodulation content determined at a time previous to the current time;

comparing the determined intermodulation ratio with stored intermodulation ratios; and

communicating a warning in response to the comparing indicating the predistortion system is unhealthy.

12. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein determining the current intermodulation content determines the intermodulation content for a predistortion system considered to be potentially unhealthy, and the wherein previous intermodulation content was determined at a time when the predistortion system was considered to be healthy.

13. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein determining the current intermodulation content determines the intermodulation content for a predistortion system at a potentially partially corrected state, and the wherein previous intermodulation content was determined at a time when the predistortion system was considered to be at a fully corrected state.

14. The apparatus of claim 13, wherein:

determining the current intermodulation content further comprises determining the current intermodulation content using transmitted waveforms and feedback waveforms at the potentially partially corrected state;

the previous intermodulation content was determined using transmitted waveforms and feedback waveforms at a fully corrected state of the predistortion system; and

a transmitted waveform is a signal before the predistortion system and a feedback waveform is a signal from an output of the predistortion system.

15. The apparatus of claim 14, wherein:

determining the previous intermodulation content is determined by;

determining a first difference between a first mean squared error of samples of a feedback waveform created from a transmitted waveform having Nth order intermodulation added thereto and samples of the transmitted waveform having the Nth order intermodulation added thereto; and

determining a second difference between a mean squared error of samples of a feedback waveform created from a transmitted waveform without Nth order intermodulation added thereto and samples of the transmitted waveform without the Nth order intermodulation added thereto; and

subtracting the first difference from the second difference to determine the previous intermodulation content; and

the current intermodulation content is determined by;

determining a third difference between a first mean squared error of samples of a feedback waveform created from a transmitted waveform having Nth order intermodulation added thereto and samples of the transmitted waveform having the Nth order intermodulation added thereto; and

determining a fourth difference between a mean squared error of samples of a feedback waveform created from a transmitted waveform without Nth order intermodulation added thereto and samples of the transmitted waveform without the Nth order intermodulation added thereto; and

subtracting the fourth difference from the third difference to determine the current intermodulation content.

16. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein the intermodulation ratio is determined as follows:

IM_Ratio=Delta1/Delta2, where IM_Ratio is the intermodulation ratio, where Delta1=(MSE_D−

MSE_C), where Delta2=(MSE_B−

MSE_A), MSE_D is the fourth difference, MSE_C is the third difference, MSE_B is the second difference, and MSE_A is the first difference.

17. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the stored intermodulation ratios comprise intermodulation ratios taken at a time a predistortion system was known to be healthy.

18. The apparatus of claim 17, wherein the stored intermodulation ratios further comprise one or more intermodulation ratios for the predistortion system based on manually introduced degradation for the predistortion system, wherein the manually introduced degradation simulates values of intermodulation ratios for a predistortion system deemed to be unhealthy.

19. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein:

comparing further comprises determining whether a value of the intermodulation ratio is above a threshold and determining the predistortion system is unhealthy based on the value of the intermodulation ratio being above the threshold.

20. The apparatus of claim 19, wherein comparing further comprises determining whether a value of the intermodulation ratio is above a second threshold that is less than the first threshold in terms of values of the intermodulation ratio for the first and second thresholds and determining the predistortion system is unhealthy based on the value of the intermodulation ratio being above the second threshold.

21. The apparatus of claim 11, further comprising a transmitter comprising the predistortion system.

22. A computer program product comprising a computer-readable storage medium bearing computer program code embodied therein for use with a computer, the computer program code comprising:

code for determining at a current time a current intermodulation content of a predistortion system;

code for determining an intermodulation ratio using the current intermodulation content and a previous intermodulation content for the predistortion system, the previous intermodulation content determined at a time previous to the current time;

code for comparing the determined intermodulation ratio with stored intermodulation ratios; and

code for communicating a warning in response to the comparing indicating the predistortion system is unhealthy.