Method and evaluation system for supervising correct belt utilization

• US 9,266,500 B2
• Filed: 10/19/2012
• Issued: 02/23/2016
• Est. Priority Date: 01/26/2012
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Audi AG (Volkswagen AG)
• Original Assignee: Audi AG (Volkswagen AG)
• Inventors: Brand, Martin, Rigley, Philip, Settgast, Walter, Kuebler, Heiko
• Primary Examiner(s): Tran, Khoi
• Assistant Examiner(s): NGUYEN, ROBERT T
• Application Number:
  US14/374,422
• Publication Number:
  US 20150046041A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,222 Days
• Field of Search: 701/45
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: B60R 16/02 electric constitutive elements
• CPC Class Codes: B60R 2022/4816 for sensing locking of buckle
• CPC Class Codes: B60R 2022/4858 for sensing pressure on seat
• CPC Class Codes: B60R 2022/4866 Displaying or indicating arrangements thereof
• CPC Class Codes: B60R 22/48 Control systems, alarms, or interlock systems, for the correct application of the belt or harness

Abstract

A method and an evaluation system supervise correct belt utilization of at least one safety belt in a motor vehicle, the open and/or closed belt lock state being supervised at the respective belt lock of a vehicle seat occupied by a person and a warning signal being given and/or the safety system of the motor vehicle being influenced if an unclosed belt lock is detected. In particular, feigned belt utilization is also detected by evaluating the temporal sequence of belt lock actuations with respect to further operations and/or states determined in the motor vehicle.

Claims

1. A method for supervising correct belt utilization of a safety belt in a motor vehicle, comprising:

supervising belt lock state changes for a belt lock at a driver'"'"'s seat of the motor vehicle, each belt lock state change being either a change from an open belt lock state to a closed belt lock state or a change from the closed belt lock state to the open belt lock state;

emitting a warning signal and/or influencing a safety system of the motor vehicle if the open belt lock state is detected; and

detecting feigned belt utilization at the driver'"'"'s seat by evaluating the belt lock state changes with respect to door actuations in the motor vehicle, feigned belt utilization being detected if at least one of the following conditions is determined;

a driver'"'"'s door has been unlocked from outside the motor vehicle and the closed belt lock state already existed before the driver'"'"'s door was opened;

there is no belt lock state change in a time period from opening of the driver'"'"'s door until starting driving;

a plurality of driving cycles are detected without any belt lock state change, each driving cycle comprising opening and closing of the driver'"'"'s door; and

the closed belt lock state is maintained without a belt lock state change in a time period of from when the driver'"'"'s door is locked from outside until a vehicle safety system has been entirely switched off.

2. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein if changing from the closed belt lock state to the open belt lock state is followed in a predetermined period of time by changing from the open belt lock state to the closed belt lock state, pseudo belt utilization is assumed such that an otherwise-qualifying belt lock state change is disregarded.

3. The method as claimed in claim 2, wherein the predetermined period of time is less than or equal to five seconds.

4. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein an adaptive cruise control is influenced or deactivated when feigned belt utilization is detected.

5. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein a start/stop system is influenced or deactivated when feigned belt utilization is detected.

6. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein an actuation of an associated airbag system is influenced when feigned belt utilization is detected.

7. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein an identifier is stored in a memory for detected feigned belt utilization, and the identifier is queried each time an engine of the motor vehicle is started and is taken into account for controlling relevant safety systems.

8. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein if there is no belt lock state change in the time period from opening of the driver'"'"'s door until starting driving, feigned belt utilization is detected only if there are also the plurality of driving cycles without any belt lock state change.

9. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein feigned belt utilization is detected only if all of the following conditions are determined:

the driver'"'"'s door has been unlocked from outside the motor vehicle and the closed belt lock state already existed before the driver'"'"'s door was opened;

there is no belt lock state change in the time period from opening of the driver'"'"'s door until starting driving;

a plurality of driving cycles are detected without any belt lock state change; and

the closed belt lock state is maintained without a belt lock state change in the time period of from when the driver'"'"'s door is locked from outside until the vehicle safety system has been entirely switched off.

10. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein feigned belt utilization is detected if the driver'"'"'s door has been unlocked from outside the motor vehicle and the closed belt lock state already existed before the driver'"'"'s door was opened.

11. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein feigned belt utilization is detected if there is no belt lock state change in the time period from opening of the driver'"'"'s door until starting driving.

12. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein feigned belt utilization is detected if a plurality of driving cycles are detected without any belt lock state change.

13. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein feigned belt utilization is detected if the closed belt lock state is maintained without a belt lock state change in the time period of from when the driver'"'"'s door is locked from outside until the vehicle safety system has been entirely switched off.

14. An evaluation system, comprising:

a processor to receive a belt lock signal reporting an open belt lock state or closed belt lock state to the evaluation system; and

a belt lock state counter to count, based on the belt lock signal, belt lock state changes for a belt lock at a driver'"'"'s seat of the motor vehicle, each belt lock state change being either a closing operation to change from the open belt lock state to the closed belt lock state or an opening operation to change from the closed belt lock state to the open belt lock state, the belt lock state counter identifying a temporal sequence of opening and closing operations for a belt lock, wherein the processor;

causes a warning signal to be emitted and/or influences a safety system of the motor vehicle if the open belt lock state is detected;

evaluates belt lock state changes taking into account door lock actuations and further events and states of the motor vehicle; and

detects feigned belt utilization at the driver'"'"'s seat, feigned belt utilization being detected if at least one of the following conditions is determined;

a driver'"'"'s door has been unlocked from outside the motor vehicle and the closed belt lock state already existed before the driver'"'"'s door was opened;

there is no belt lock state change in a time period from opening of the driver'"'"'s door until starting driving;

a plurality of driving cycles are detected without any belt lock state change, each driving cycle comprising opening and closing of the driver'"'"'s door; and

the closed belt lock state is maintained without a belt lock state change in a time period of from when the driver'"'"'s door is locked from outside until a vehicle safety system has been entirely switched off.

15. The evaluation system as claimed in claim 14, further comprising a memory to store an identifier which indicates feigned belt utilization and can be queried from the memory for control purposes and/or when carrying out service work.