Theft deterrence system and method for marine vessels

• US 9,284,032 B1
• Filed: 09/06/2012
• Issued: 03/15/2016
• Est. Priority Date: 09/30/2011
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Brunswick Corporation
• Original Assignee: Brunswick Corporation
• Inventors: Snyder, Matthew W., Kirchhoff, Thomas S.
• Primary Examiner(s): Barakat, Mohamed
• Application Number:
  US13/605,566
• Time in Patent Office: 1,286 Days
• Field of Search: 340/984, 340/425.5, 340/426.1, 340/426.11, 340/426.13, 340/539.1, 340/539.11, 70/21, 70 29- 35
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: B60R 2325/304 Boats
• CPC Class Codes: B60R 25/04 operating on the propulsion system, e.g. engine or drive motor
• CPC Class Codes: B60R 25/045 by limiting or cutting the electrical supply to the propulsion unit
• CPC Class Codes: B60R 25/102 a signal being sent to a remote location, e.g. a radio signal being transmitted to a police station, a security company or the owner
• CPC Class Codes: B63B 2017/0009 Methods or devices specially adapted for preventing theft, or unauthorized use of vessels, or parts or accessories thereof, other than by using locks
• CPC Class Codes: B63B 2201/26 signalling anomalies, e.g. rupture of connection
• CPC Class Codes: B63H 21/21 Control means for engine or transmission, specially adapted for use on marine vessels
• CPC Class Codes: B63H 21/213 Levers or the like for controlling the engine or the transmission, e.g. single hand control levers
• CPC Class Codes: B63H 21/24 the vessels being small craft, e.g. racing boats
• CPC Class Codes: F02B 61/045 for outboard marine engines
• CPC Class Codes: G05D 1/0206 specially adapted to water vehicles
• CPC Class Codes: G07C 5/008 communicating information to a remotely located station transmission systems for measured values G08C
• CPC Class Codes: Y02T 10/7072 Electromobility specific charging systems or methods for batteries, ultracapacitors, supercapacitors or double-layer capacitors

Abstract

A control system and method for deterring theft of a marine vessel. A security control circuit receives a transponder identification code from a transponder. The engine control circuit has a status that is based on a comparison of a stored identification code with the transponder identification code. The status of the engine control circuit is locked if the stored identification code does not match the transponder identification code and the status of the engine control circuit is unlocked if the stored identification code does match the transponder identification code. The security control circuit determines an arbitrated lock status of the control system based on a conjunctive analysis of the locked and unlocked statuses of a plurality of engine control circuits connected to a network bus, and indicates the arbitrated lock status to an operator of the marine vessel.

Claims

1. A control system for deterring theft of a marine vessel having a plurality of engine control circuits that are selectively connectable to a network bus, each engine control circuit controlling operation of a respective marine engine in a plurality of marine engines, the control system comprising:

a security control circuit that receives a first transponder identification code from a first transponder;

wherein each engine control circuit has a first stored identification code;

wherein each engine control circuit that is connected to the network bus has an individual status that is based on a comparison of the first stored identification code with the first transponder identification code;

wherein the individual status of the engine control circuit is locked if the first stored identification code does not match the first transponder identification code and wherein the individual status of the engine control circuit is unlocked if the first stored identification code does match the first transponder identification code; and

wherein the security control circuit performs a conjunctive analysis of each of the individual locked and unlocked statuses of each of the engine control circuits in the plurality of engine control circuits that are connected to the network bus so as to determine an overall arbitrated lock status of the control system, and in response to an outcome of the conjunctive analysis, generates an indication specifying the arbitrated lock status to an operator of the marine vessel.

2. A control system according to claim 1, further comprising a receiver on the marine vessel receiving the first transponder identification code, wherein the security control circuit relays the first transponder identification code front the receiver to each engine control circuit that is connected to the network bus.

3. A control system according to claim 1, wherein the security control circuit receives from a second transponder a second transponder identification code that is different than the first transponder identification code, and wherein each engine control circuit in the plurality of engine control circuits has a second stored identification code.

4. A control system according to claim 3, wherein the first and second transponder identification codes are stored by the engine control circuits as the first and second stored identification codes, respectively, during setup of the control system.

5. A control system according to claim 4, wherein the arbitrated lock status is pairing when at least one of the engine control circuits in the plurality of engine control circuits is in the process of storing one of the first and second transponder identification codes.

6. A control system according to claim 5, wherein when the arbitrated lock status is pairing, the security control circuit provides a first indication to the operator of the marine vessel.

7. A control system according to claim 6, wherein the arbitrated lock status is locked if at least one of the engine control circuits in the plurality of engine control circuits has a locked status and none of the engine control circuits has an unlocked status and none of the engine control circuits has a pairing status.

8. A control system according to claim 7, wherein when the arbitrated lock status is locked, the security control circuit provides a second indication to the operator of the marine vessel that is different than the first indication.

9. A control system according to claim 8, wherein the arbitrated lock status is unlocked if at least one of the engine control circuits in the plurality of engine control circuits has an unlocked status and none of the engine control circuits has a locked status and none of the engine control circuits has a pairing status.

10. A control system according to claim 9, wherein when the arbitrated lock status is unlocked, the security control circuit provides a third indication to the operator of the marine vessel that is different than the first indication and different than the second indication.

11. A control system according to claim 10, wherein the arbitrated lock status is error when at least one of the engine control circuits in the plurality of engine control circuits has a locked status and at least one of the engine control circuits in the plurality of engine control circuits has an unlocked status.

12. A control system according to claim 11, wherein when the arbitrated lock status is error, the security control circuit provides a fourth indication to the operator of the marine vessel that is different than the first indication and different than the second indication and different than the third indication.

13. A control system according to claim 9, wherein when the arbitrated lock status is unlocked, the engine control circuits in the plurality of engine control circuits that are connected to the network bus allow normal operation of the respective marine engines.

14. A control system according to claim 13, wherein when the arbitrated lock status is locked, the engine control circuits in the plurality of engine control circuits that are connected to the network bus limit operation of the respective marine engines to a low power output.

15. A control system according to claim 14, wherein the low power output is a forced idle.

16. A control system according to claim 1, further comprising, a telematics circuit that reads the arbitrated lock status.

17. A control system according to claim 16, wherein the telematics circuit establishes a virtual geographical perimeter around the marine vessel based on a determination that the arbitrated lock status is not unlocked and removes the virtual geographical perimeter based on a determination that the arbitrated lock status is unlocked.

18. A control system according to claim 17, wherein the telematics circuit sends an alert when the virtual geographical perimeter is established, the arbitrated lock status is not unlocked, and the marine vessel has been outside the virtual geographical perimeter for longer than a predetermined period of time.

19. A control system according to claim 4, further comprising a service tool circuit that causes the engine control circuits to unlearn the first and second stored identification codes and to store third and fourth transponder identification codes provided by third and fourth transponders, respectively.

20. A control system according to claim 9, wherein when the arbitrated lock status is unlocked, the Status remains as such until the respective marine engines are shut off.

21. A control system according to claim 1, wherein the indication is one or both of a visual and audible indication generated by the security control circuit.

22. A method for deterring theft of a marine vessel having a control system including a plurality of engine control circuits, each engine control circuit in the plurality of engine control circuits being selectively connectable to a network bus and controlling operation of a respective marine engine in a plurality of marine engines, the method comprising:

receiving with a security control circuit a transponder identification code from a transponder;

determining a status of an engine control circuit based on a comparison of an identification code stored in the engine control circuit with the transponder identification code, wherein the status of the engine control circuit is locked if the stored identification code does not match the transponder identification code and wherein the status of the engine control circuit is unlocked if the stored identification code does match the transponder identification code;

determining an overall arbitrated lock status of the control system by performing a conjunctive analysis that takes into account all of the locked and unlocked statuses of all of the engine control circuits in the plurality of engine control circuits that are connected to the network bus; and

in response to an outcome of the conjunctive analysis, generating an indication specifying the arbitrated lock status to an operator of the marine vessel.

23. A method according to claim 22, further comprising relaying the transponder identification code to each engine control circuit that is connected to the network bus.

24. A method according to claim 22, further comprising storing the transponder identification code as the stored identification code.

25. A method according to claim 24, wherein the arbitrated lock status is pairing when at least one of the engine control circuits in the plurality of engine control circuits is in the process of storing the transponder identification code.

26. A method according to claim 25, further comprising providing a first indication to the operator of the marine vessel when the arbitrated lock status is pairing.

27. A method according to claim 26, wherein the arbitrated lock status is locked if at least one of the engine control circuits in the plurality of engine control circuits has a locked status and none of the engine control circuits has an unlocked status and none of the engine control circuits has a pairing status.

28. A method according to claim 27, further comprising providing a second indication to the operator of the marine vessel that is different than the first indication when the arbitrated lock status is locked.

29. A method according to claim 28, wherein the arbitrated lock status is unlocked if at least one of the engine control circuits in the plurality of engine control circuits has an unlocked status and none of the engine control circuits has a locked status and none of the engine control circuits has a pairing status.

30. A method according to claim 29, further comprising providing a third indication to the operator of the marine vessel that is different than the first indication and different than the second indication when the arbitrated lock status is unlocked.

31. A method according to claim 30, wherein the arbitrated lock status is error when at least one of the engine control circuits in the plurality of engine control circuits has a locked status and at least one of the engine control circuits in the plurality of engine control circuits has an unlocked status.

32. A method according to claim 31, further comprising providing a fourth indication to the operator of the marine vessel that is different than the first indication and different than the second indication and different than the third indication when the arbitrated lock status is error.

33. A method according to claim 29, further comprising allowing normal operation of the respective marine engines when the arbitrated lock status is unlocked.

34. A method according to claim 33, further comprising, limiting operation of the respective marine engines to a low power output when the arbitrated lock status is locked.

35. A method according to claim 34, wherein the low power output is a forced idle.

36. A method according to claim 29, further comprising providing a telematics circuit that establishes a virtual geographical perimeter around the marine vessel.

37. A method according to claim 36, further comprising removing the virtual geographical perimeter when the arbitrated lock status is unlocked.

38. A method according, to claim 37, further comprising determining whether a periodic message from the security control circuit is being sent to the telematics circuit, and re-establishing the virtual geographical perimeter at a new location of the marine vessel if no such periodic message is being sent.

39. A method according to claim 38, limber comprising sending an alert when the virtual geographical perimeter is established, the arbitrated lock status is not unlocked, and the marine vessel has been outside the virtual geographical perimeter for longer than a predetermined period of time.

40. A method for deterring theft of a marine vessel having a plurality of engine control circuits, each engine control circuit controlling operation of a respective marine engine in a plurality of marine engines, the method comprising:

receiving with a security control circuit a transponder identification code from a transponder;

determining an individual status of each engine control circuit based on a comparison of an identification code stored in each engine control circuit with the transponder identification code, wherein the individual status of the engine control circuit is locked if the stored identification code does not match the transponder identification code and wherein the individual status of the engine control circuit is unlocked if the stored identification code does match the transponder identification code;

performing a conjunctive analysis of each of the individual locked and unlocked statuses of each of the engine control circuits in the plurality of engine control circuits so as to determine an overall arbitrated lock status, and in response to an outcome of the conjunctive analysis, generating an indication specifying the arbitrated lock status to an operator of the marine vessel; and

automatically establishing a virtual geographical perimeter around the marine vessel with a telematics circuit based on a determination that the arbitrated lock status is not unlocked and automatically removing the virtual geographical perimeter based on a determination that the arbitrated lock status is unlocked.

41. A method according to claim 40, further comprising relaying the transponder identification code to each engine control circuit in the plurality of engine control circuits.

42. A method according to claim 40, further comprising determining whether a periodic message from the security control circuit is being sent to the telematics circuit, and re-establishing the virtual geographical perimeter at a new location of the marine vessel if no such periodic message is being sent.

43. A method according to claim 42, further comprising sending an alert when the virtual geographical perimeter is established, the arbitrated lock status is not unlocked, and the marine vessel has been outside the virtual geographical perimeter for longer than a predetermined period of time.

44. A control system for deterring theft of a marine vessel having a plurality of engine control circuits, each engine control circuit controlling operation of a respective marine engine in a plurality of marine engines, the control system comprising:

a security control circuit that receives a transponder identification code from a transponder;

wherein each engine control circuit has a stored identification code;

wherein the security control circuit determines an individual status of each engine control circuit by comparing each stored identification code with the transponder identification code;

wherein the individual status of the engine control circuit is locked if the stored identification code does not match the transponder identification code and wherein the individual status of the engine control circuit is unlocked if the stored identification code does match the transponder identification code;

wherein the security control circuit performs a conjunctive analysis of each of the individual locked and unlocked statuses of each of the engine control circuits in the plurality of engine control circuits so as to determine an overall arbitrated lock status, and in response to an outcome of the conjunctive analysis, generates an indication specifying the arbitrated lock status to an operator of the marine vessel; and

wherein a telematics circuit automatically establishes a virtual geographical perimeter around the marine vessel based on a determination that the arbitrated lock status is not unlocked and removes the virtual geographical perimeter based on a determination that the arbitrated lock status is unlocked.

45. A control system according to claim 44, wherein the telematics circuit determines whether a periodic message is being sent from the security control circuit, and re-establishes the virtual geographical perimeter at a new location of the marine vessel if no such periodic message is being sent.

46. A control system according to claim 45, wherein the telematics circuit sends an alert when the virtual geographical perimeter is established, the arbitrated lock status is not unlocked, and the marine vessel has been outside the virtual geographical perimeter for longer than a predetermined period of time.