Method and system for mitigating the effects of an impaired driver

• US 9,290,174 B1
• Filed: 10/23/2014
• Issued: 03/22/2016
• Est. Priority Date: 10/23/2014
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: GM Global Technology Operations LLC (General Motors Company)
• Original Assignee: GM Global Technology Operations LLC (General Motors Company)
• Inventors: Zagorski, Chad T.
• Primary Examiner(s): Zanelli, Michael J
• Application Number:
  US14/521,623
• Time in Patent Office: 516 Days
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: B60K 28/06 responsive to incapacity of driver
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2040/0818 Inactivity or incapacity of driver
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2520/10 Longitudinal speed
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2540/225 Direction of gaze
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2540/229 Attention level, e.g. attentive to driving, reading or sleeping
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2540/26 Incapacity
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2540/30 Driving style
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2554/00 Input parameters relating to objects
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2554/4029 Pedestrians
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2554/4041 Position
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2554/406 Traffic density
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2554/80 Spatial relation or speed relative to objects
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2555/20 Ambient conditions, e.g. wind or rain
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 30/09 Taking automatic action to avoid collision, e.g. braking and steering
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 30/18 Propelling the vehicle

Abstract

A system and method that, in response to the detection of an impaired driver, develops a scenario-dependent response with an escalating sequence of awakening actions and/or automated driving actions that are designed to mitigate the effects of impaired driving for that particular driving scenario. Some examples of awakening actions include visual, audible, haptic and/or miscellaneous warnings intended to awaken or reengage the impaired driver. If the awakening actions are ineffective, one or more automated driving actions may be used to control certain aspects of vehicle braking, steering, accelerating, etc. The scenario-dependent response is at least partially based on the state, conditions and/or environment in and around the host vehicle (i.e., the current driving scenario) and may take into account factors such as: vehicle dynamics, road characteristics, pedestrian and vehicle traffic conditions, weather conditions and more.

Claims

1. A method for use with a vehicle control system installed on a host vehicle and having one or more vehicle sensor(s), one or more environment sensor(s), and a control module, the method comprising the steps of:

detecting an impaired driver;

gathering sensor readings from at least one of the vehicle sensor(s) or the environment sensor(s) at the control module;

using the control module and sensor readings from at least one of the vehicle sensor(s) or the environment sensor(s) to develop a customized scenario-dependent response to the impaired driver, wherein the customized scenario-dependent response at least partially depends on a likelihood of collision and/or a potential severity of a collision and includes at least one awakening action or automated driving action to address a current driving scenario and to mitigate the effects of the impaired driver; and

performing the customized scenario-dependent response.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the gathering step further comprises gathering speed readings from one or more speed sensor(s) in order to determine at least one of a vehicle speed or acceleration, and the using step further comprises using speed readings from the speed sensor(s) to develop the scenario-dependent response, wherein the scenario-dependent response includes at least one awakening action or automated driving action that addresses the vehicle speed or acceleration when mitigating the effects of the impaired driver.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the gathering step further comprises gathering navigation readings from a navigation unit in order to determine characteristics of a current road segment, and the using step further comprises using navigation readings from the navigation unit to develop the scenario-dependent response, wherein the scenario-dependent response includes at least one awakening action or automated driving action that addresses the characteristics of the current road segment when mitigating the effects of the impaired driver.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the gathering step further comprises gathering object readings from one or more object sensor(s) in order to determine a concentration of other vehicles or pedestrians in the area of the host vehicle, and the using step further comprises using the object readings from the object sensor(s) to develop the scenario-dependent response, wherein the scenario-dependent response includes at least one awakening action or automated driving action that addresses the concentration of other vehicles or pedestrians in the area of the host vehicle when mitigating the effects of the impaired driver.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the using step further comprises using the sensor readings from at least one of the vehicle sensor(s) or the environment sensor(s) to generate a scenario indicator code that is numerical and is representative of certain aspects of the current driving scenario, and using the scenario indicator code to develop the scenario-dependent response.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein the scenario indicator code is generated by starting with a base indicator code representative of a starting or default state of the current driving scenario, and using the sensor readings from at least one of the vehicle sensor(s) or the environment sensor(s) to adjust the base indicator code and arrive at the scenario indicator code.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein previous driving behavior or patterns of the impaired driver influence the base indicator code.

8. The method of claim 6, wherein a time of day or day of the week influences the base indicator code.

9. The method of claim 5, wherein a first sensor reading from a vehicle sensor causes the scenario indicator code to be increased and/or decreased by a first amount and a second sensor reading from an environment sensor causes the scenario indicator code to be increased and/or decreased by a second amount, and the first and second amounts are different so that the first and second sensor readings have a different influence on the scenario indicator code.

10. The method of claim 5, wherein the scenario indicator code is a multi-bit string with a plurality of bits, and each bit or group of bits is representative of a characteristic of the current driving scenario such that the scenario indicator code has a meaningful number format.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein the performing step further comprises performing the scenario-dependent response by issuing one or more visual, audible and/or haptic alert(s) that are designed to awake or rouse the impaired driver.

12. The method of claim 11, the performing step further comprises performing the scenario-dependent response by carrying out a lane centering maneuver at the same time as issuing the visual, audible and/or haptic alert(s).

13. The method of claim 1, wherein the performing step further comprises performing the scenario-dependent response by issuing a miscellaneous alert that includes at least one of the following actions:

lowering a driver'"'"'s window, turning up the volume on a vehicle radio, or increasing the fan speed on a HVAC system.

14. The method of claim 1, wherein the performing step further comprises performing the scenario-dependent response by carrying out one or more automated driving action(s) with at least one of an engine control module, a brake control module or a steering control module.

15. The method of claim 1, wherein the performing step further comprises performing the scenario-dependent response by carrying out a sequence of escalating awakening actions and automated driving actions that are designed to mitigate the effects of the impaired driver.

16. The method of claim 15, wherein the escalating sequence begins with one or more awakening action(s) designed to awake or rouse the impaired driver and then progresses to one or more automated driving action(s) that include at least one of a lane centering maneuver, a light braking maneuver, and an automatic parking maneuver.

17. The method of claim 15, wherein a duration of at least one of the awakening action(s) is based on a scenario indicator code.

18. The method of claim 15, wherein a duration of at least one of the awakening action(s) is based on a likelihood of a collision and/or a potential severity of a collision involving the host vehicle, and the duration is longer when the likelihood and/or the potential severity is lower.

19. A method for use with a vehicle control system installed on a host vehicle and having one or more vehicle sensor(s), one or more environment sensor(s), and a control module, the method comprising the steps of:

detecting an impaired driver;

gathering sensor readings from at least one of the vehicle sensor(s) or the environment sensor(s) at the control module;

using the control module and sensor readings from at least one of the vehicle sensor(s) or the environment sensor(s) to make adjustments to a scenario indicator code that is representative of certain aspects of the current driving scenario;

using the scenario indicator code to develop a scenario-dependent response to the impaired driver that includes an escalating sequence of awakening actions designed to engage the impaired driver and automated driving actions designed to mitigate the effects of the impaired driver; and

performing the scenario-dependent response.

20. A vehicle control system installed on a host vehicle, comprising:

one or more vehicle sensor(s) configured to provide vehicle sensor readings;

one or more environment sensor(s) configured to provide environment sensor readings;

one or more output device(s) configured to receive command signals and to initiate a scenario-dependent response when an impaired driver is detected; and

a control module coupled to the vehicle sensor(s) for receiving the vehicle sensor readings, the environment sensor(s) for receiving the environment sensor readings, and the output device(s) for providing the command signals;

wherein the control module is configured to develop a customized scenario-dependent response to the impaired driver and to initiate the customized scenario-dependent response with the command signals provided to the output device(s), and the customized scenario-dependent response at least partially depends on a likelihood of collision and/or a potential severity of a collision and includes at least one awakening action or automated driving action to address a current driving scenario and to mitigate the effects of the impaired driver.

21. A method for use with a vehicle control system installed on a host vehicle and having one or more vehicle sensor(s), one or more environment sensor(s), and a control module, the method comprising the steps of:

detecting an impaired driver;

gathering sensor readings from at least one of the vehicle sensor(s) or the environment sensor(s) at the control module;

using the control module and sensor readings from at least one of the vehicle sensor(s) or the environment sensor(s) to generate a scenario indicator code that is numerical and is representative of certain aspects of a current driving scenario, and using the scenario indicator code to develop a scenario-dependent response to the impaired driver, wherein the scenario-dependent response includes at least one awakening action or automated driving action that is customized to address the current driving scenario and to mitigate the effects of the impaired driver; and

performing the scenario-dependent response.