System and method for resource modeling and simulation in test planning

• US 9,292,421 B2
• Filed: 10/16/2014
• Issued: 03/22/2016
• Est. Priority Date: 09/11/2009
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Original Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Inventors: Bassin, Kathryn A., Hess, Howard M., Huang, Sheng, Kagan, Steven M., Li, Shao C., Li, Zhong J., Liu, He H., Smith, Susan E., Tan, Hua F., Wang, Li, Zhu, Jun
• Primary Examiner(s): NGUYEN, DUY KHUONG THANH
• Application Number:
  US14/515,609
• Publication Number:
  US 20150067636A1
• Time in Patent Office: 523 Days
• Field of Search: 717/124, 717134-135
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/3672 Test management
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/3684 for test design, e.g. generating new test cases
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 8/70 Software maintenance or management
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06 Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06312 Adjustment or analysis of established resource schedule, e.g. resource or task levelling, or dynamic rescheduling
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06313 Resource planning in a project environment
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/067 Enterprise or organisation modelling
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/103 Workflow collaboration or project management
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0249 based upon budgets or funds

Abstract

A method includes generating a test model based on at least one of test group dependencies and test group constraints and generating a resource base. the method includes generating a cost model and generating a resource allocation plan based on the test model, the resource base, and the cost model.

Claims

1. A system comprising:

a test planning optimization workbench including;

a processor;

a memory;

a test modeling module, using the processor, operable to generate a test model from test cases and test case dependencies, wherein the test case dependencies are automatically derived from traceability between the test cases and use cases, the test cases are defined in a micro plan as tasks that are performed in association with a particular use case, and as such are linked to the particular use case, wherein the test modeling module is operable to determine a test estimate effort for each test case by leveraging knowledge of best practices and an applicable reference project using pre-defined rules, logic and probability tables, wherein the pre-defined rules, logic and probability tables are based on analysis and data-mining of historic data from past projects;

a cost module, using the processor, operable to generate a cost model based on at least one constraint and at least one of defect-fix cost, business cost, and delay cost; and

a resource modeling and simulation module, using the processor, operable to generate a resource plan based on a resource base, the test model, and the cost model, wherein the resource plan allocates resources defined in the resource base to the test cases, minimizes a total cost base on the cost model, conforms to the test case dependencies defined in the test model, and satisfies the at least one constraint defined in the cost model.

2. The system of claim 1, wherein the test planning optimization workbench dynamically updates the resource plan in response to an adjusting of the at least one constraint.

3. The system of claim 1, wherein the test planning optimization workbench generates an alert when a project delay exceeds a delay warning threshold.

4. The system of claim 1, wherein the test planning optimization workbench displays the generated resource plan.

5. The system of claim 1, wherein the test planning optimization workbench receives data for defining and constructing the cost model from a user.

6. The system of claim 5, wherein the received data for the defining and the constructing the cost model includes at least one of:

one or more warning thresholds, expected escape defects, one or more business cost configurations, one or more project delay cost configurations, and one or more defect fix cost configurations.

7. The system of claim 6, wherein the resource modeling and simulation module sends a warning to a user when a project schedule exceeds the one or more warning thresholds.

8. The system of claim 7, wherein the warning is one of an email and a pop-up message prompting the user to take action to address the exceeded project schedule.

9. The system of claim 8, wherein the test planning optimization workbench receives a resource adjustment from the user and generates a new resource plan based on the received resource adjustment.

10. The system of claim 1, wherein the resource plan includes a micro plan which can be displayed with a simulator.

11. The system of claim 10, wherein the test modeling module is operable to identify triggers which each test case is associated with, and to associate the triggers with any test dependencies related to each test case.